Are Fossils evidence of evolution ....or are the evidence of fossils

[Guest kingdombrat]

14 minutes ago, The Barbarian said:

Or they've found fossils of other animals and assumed they were people.    Which has happened often.   It's how the giant cyclops legends began, for example.  Absent any evidence, we merely have Cody's stories about what people found and said.   And given his proclivity to embellish his stories...

 

Like I mentioned before, I now have in my possession, the collection passed down from my Great Grandfather that includes the pictures from the Smithsonian articles/pamphlets showing fully assembled skeletal remains between 14 feet and 21 feet.   This is around early 1900's.   No way those skeletal remains are anything but human!

[Justin Adams]

9 minutes ago, kingdombrat said:

Like I mentioned before, I now have in my possession, the collection passed down from my Great Grandfather that includes the pictures from the Smithsonian articles/pamphlets showing fully assembled skeletal remains between 14 feet and 21 feet.   This is around early 1900's.   No way those skeletal remains are anything but human!

Keep them safe. It goes against the narrative to have them. Many like those have just gone missing. Take pictures and archive them.

[Guest kingdombrat]

24 minutes ago, The Barbarian said:

Except, it's not a complete set of instructions.   It's a brief summary of materials and dimensions, none of which would have made it seaworthy.    The details were up to Noah.   

Again, if one is allowed to inject non-scriptural miracles to cover any problems in one's story, then any story is equally valid.

 

Clearly, you have never read the list.   When we compare that list to Ancient Maritime from the area of Mesopotamia, it's spot on and then goes into great detail what each item is.   So in [Truth], we have a very good idea here.

 

It's not like taking God took [Dust and Formed Life Molds] and trying to turn it into a blasphemous idea of Evolution, the Noah Tale gives us great detail and specifics.

[teddyv]

The irony here is we have claims of ancient hominids essentially being fraudulent and then unverified claims of giant skeletons being related as gospel truth.

[Guest kingdombrat]

1 minute ago, teddyv said:

The irony here is we have claims of ancient hominids essentially being fraudulent and then unverified claims of giant skeletons being related as gospel truth.

Hominids by whose classification though?

Not God's!

[teddyv]

1 hour ago, kingdombrat said:

Hominids by whose classification though?

Not God's!

Not my point.

[JohnR7]

On 4/23/2021 at 11:32 AM, kingdombrat said:

We don't know what Language Adam to Noah used. 

Of course we know. I took an ancient history class in High School. The author of the book we used was James Breasted himself. There were two (groups) people that lived in the Tigris Euphrates River Valley (Mesopotamia).  First was the "Jewish" people usually referred to as Semitic. Then what I call the Phoenicians because of our hooked on phonics today. This is why Cain says: "whoever finds me will kill me." (Genesis 4:14) Although history does not consider there to be any conflict between these two groups.  

Today the Hasidic people have preserved the Kabbalistic teachings on the Hebrew Language of the Bible. There are some wonderful teachings on this on YouTube. Of course modern (Yiddish) is not the same as the Hebrew used to write the Bible. In Biblical Hebrew, there are approximately 7,000 words. Modern Hebrew has approximately 33,000 words. So it should not take to much effort to learn a language of only 7,000 words. 

If you look at language from the Phoenician perspective that they teach on our public schools this is going to be different than looking at the history of language from the Semitic perspective. I went to a private high school run by holocaust survivors. So I received more of a classic education.  

Today we see photos of american soldiers at the foundation for the tower of Babel. Saddam Hussein tried to rebuild the city but he was not able. We are told that the city will never be rebuilt. It is still there as an archeology site. 

[The Barbarian]

4 hours ago, teddyv said:

The irony here is we have claims of ancient hominids essentially being fraudulent and then unverified claims of giant skeletons being related as gospel truth.

Yes, I noticed that,but I couldn't think of an inoffensive way to say it.   You did better than I would have.

 

[The Barbarian]

4 hours ago, kingdombrat said:

Hominids by whose classification though?

Not God's!

God doesn't classify hominids.   It's like complaining because the periodic table doesn't use God's classivication for transition metals.

 

[The Barbarian]

5 hours ago, Justin Adams said:

Like I mentioned before, I now have in my possession, the collection passed down from my Great Grandfather that includes the pictures from the Smithsonian articles/pamphlets showing fully assembled skeletal remains between 14 feet and 21 feet.   This is around early 1900's.   No way those skeletal remains are anything but human!

Fully assembled, even.   How about posting those with reference to the Smithsonian articles?   

There's a huge problem with these stories.   Physics intervenes in such things, something first noticed by Galileo.   You see, the strength a bone increases by the square of its length, but the mass increases by the cube of its length.   Which means a ten foot tall human would have difficulty even walking.  The tallest man on record required leg braces and a walking stick as an adult.  He was a bit less than 9 feet tall.

If humans were to somehow become much bigger, they would have to become less like apes and more like elephants.  Their bones would become much thicker, relative to their lengths.    Falls would then become really serious issues for them.   Because of their great mass and height, a tumble would cause much more damage to them, than it does to us.