Fauci Emails Exposed by Freedom of Information Act Exposes Serious Misformation, Critics Call for Fauci’s Firing

[WorthyBot]

The idea of “asymptomatic spread” of COVID was misinformation according to this email released.

https://worthy.watch/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/fauci-covid-email-2.jpeg

Days after the public learned of COVID in January, emails reveal the idea of COVID being specifically “engineered”!

https://worthy.watch/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/kristian-andersen-fauci-engineered-email--1024x549.jpeg

Amazingly, read what Fauci told a friend about the effectiveness of MASKS!

https://worthy.watch/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/fauci-masks.jpeg

Please feel free to read the entire batch of 3,000+ Fauci emails that were released through a Freedom of Information Act request!

Told you ?

#firefauci

— Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) June 2, 2021

Related Stories covering this scandal!

Fauci Calls Masks ‘Not Really Effective in Keeping Out Virus’ in Newly Released Email – Western Journal

Fauci worked behind the scenes to cast doubt on Wuhan lab leak hypothesis, emails show – Washington Examiner

Corrupt Media Ignore Smoking Gun Emails In Order To Protect Fauci – Federalist

Emails Show Fauci Knew Masks Weren’t Very Effective Before Pushing Universal Masking – Federalist

Emails Show Fauci Downplayed NIH Funding Of Gain Of Function Research At Wuhan Lab – Federalist

Annnnd here come the smoking guns.
Feb 1, 2020 Fauci exchanged emails with Hugh Auchincloss – a big cheese at the NIAID

I'm still trying to thread through these but here are a series of emails with email subject line: "IMPORTANT"

The real subject: gain of function research. pic.twitter.com/5TIfrp9sSZ

— Justin Hart (@justin_hart) June 2, 2021

View the full article

[Sparks]

It's good the main stream media has finally caught up with Dr. Fauci.  Good post!

We who don't watch or read the mainstream media knew this about a year ago. 

 

 

[one.opinion]

Great work, WorthyBot. You have uncovered several bombshells!

1. Dr. Fauci made a mistake in an email!!! WE SHOULD FIRE HIM!!!!

2. Kristian Anderson (who has since changed his mind) wrote Fauci an email that part of the sequence had the potential of being engineered!!! FIRE FAUCI NOW!!!

3. FAUCI TOLD A FRIEND EXACTLY WHAT EVERYONE ALREADY KNOWS!!! MASKS DON'T HELP THE WEARER THAT MUCH BUT DO LOWER THE SPREAD FROM INFECTED INDIVIDUALS!!! FAUCI MUST BE FIRED IMMEDIATELY!!!!

Seriously - whoever is doing this work needs to not do it anymore. There is enough ridiculous bovine dung being spread about this already.

[Sparks]

17 hours ago, one.opinion said:

 FAUCI MUST BE FIRED IMMEDIATELY!!!!

Yes!

Dr. Fauci really should be fired for his apparent role in paying for the gain-of-function research of Covid 19 in Wuhan and breaking the Clayton act.  If he has done what he appears to have been done, he should be in prison.

[one.opinion]

2 hours ago, Sparks said:

Dr. Fauci really should be fired for his apparent role in paying for the gain-of-function research of Covid 19 in Wuhan and breaking the Clayton act.

This is not something I've followed very closely, but I'm interested in learning more details. So I have questions.

1. What evidence do you have that gain-of-function research was occurring at the WIV?

2. What evidence do you have that Dr. Fauci paid for it?

3. How did he violate the Clayton Act?

4. What crimes did he commit, and what evidence do you have to show it?

I found the following article contained some good information, but I'd like to learn more of what you know.

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/05/the-wuhan-lab-and-the-gain-of-function-disagreement/

[Sparks]

1 minute ago, one.opinion said:

This is not something I've followed very closely, but I'm interested in learning more details. So I have questions.

1. What evidence do you have that gain-of-function research was occurring at the WIV?

2. What evidence do you have that Dr. Fauci paid for it?

3. How did he violate the Clayton Act?

4. What crimes did he commit, and what evidence do you have to show it?

I found the following article contained some good information, but I'd like to learn more of what you know.

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/05/the-wuhan-lab-and-the-gain-of-function-disagreement/

You should probably stop looking at liberal fact checks, and CNN.   When you do, the truth comes shining through.

[one.opinion]

3 minutes ago, Sparks said:

You should probably stop looking at liberal fact checks, and CNN.   When you do, the truth comes shining through.

As I just said a few minutes ago, this is not something I've studied a great deal. Will you share what you know about it - particularly the questions I raised?

[Sparks]

Just now, one.opinion said:

As I just said a few minutes ago, this is not something I've studied a great deal. Will you share what you know about it - particularly the questions I raised?

I just said, avoid the main stream media and you will see it.  It's like following a vein of gold in a mine, the mine being censorship and propagandists.  

Start with Rand Paul making a case about it, his "Told you" tweet, and so on.  He is a standing Senator who explains the Wuhan lab connection to Dr. Fauci.  Dr. Paul is also a doctor.

Good luck.

[one.opinion]

3 minutes ago, Sparks said:

I just said, avoid the main stream media and you will see it.  It's like following a vein of gold in a mine, the mine being censorship and propagandists.  

Start with Rand Paul making a case about it, his "Told you" tweet, and so on.  He is a standing Senator who explains the Wuhan lab connection to Dr. Fauci.  Dr. Paul is also a doctor.

Good luck.

Ok, just so we are clear, you are making blanket statements - including that Dr. Fauci should go to prison - but you aren't going to provide any evidence to support those statements.

[Sparks]

39 minutes ago, one.opinion said:

Ok, just so we are clear, you are making blanket statements - including that Dr. Fauci should go to prison - but you aren't going to provide any evidence to support those statements.

Did you notice, you replied immediately without even looking for yourself?  So this shows that you don't really want to know.

This just saves me time because you already have a preconceived notion about this and nothing I say will change it.  You just want to debate it.  Notice you asked for evidence, now, rather than look.  You want evidence, I will show it,  but you won't believe the evidence is evidence.  I have been through this too many times with you.  I recognize the pattern.

You know what I do when I am curious about something?  I will go look for myself and will bring myself up to speed.   Is Rand Paul not credible enough for you?  Is his official investigation not good enough?  What tripped you up when you could have just gone to look?