What makes a transitional organism transitional?

[The Barbarian]

1 hour ago, Dave-regenerated said:

I'll get to it by and by.

Sure you will.   There's a reason you're stalling and everyone knows it.

1 hour ago, Dave-regenerated said:

wanted to ask you some questions first. 

Tough. We've answered enough questions.   Time for you to step up.   Or let people make conclusions as to why you won't answer.

For maybe the eighth time, are you going to show us that math that rules out evolution and show us which law of thermodynamics rules out any process required for evolution?  You said you'd answer those questions, and now you're stonewalling.  

There never was any math or science for this, was there?  

If you don't have any idea whether or not those idea are right, and just trusted that guy in the video, just copy his evidence and show us.

How hard would that be for you?   I notice you declined to say whether or not you're an atheist.   Why is that?

[Dave-regenerated]

28 minutes ago, The Barbarian said:

Sure you will.   There's a reason you're stalling and everyone knows it.

Tough. We've answered enough questions.   Time for you to step up.   Or let people make conclusions as to why you won't answer.

For maybe the eighth time, are you going to show us that math that rules out evolution and show us which law of thermodynamics rules out any process required for evolution?  You said you'd answer those questions, and now you're stonewalling.  

There never was any math or science for this, was there?  

If you don't have any idea whether or not those idea are right, and just trusted that guy in the video, just copy his evidence and show us.

How hard would that be for you?   I notice you declined to say whether or not you're an atheist.   Why is that?

The first post I made here to you I stated I was not going to do some back and forth debate point by point.  Now that is tough.  Sorry but I'm not playing games with you.  The video I gave sums up my views and I don't have to waste time typing them for you as if that somehow nullifies the points made.  

No I am not an atheist, I was spiritual born again and regenerated by God over 8 years ago.  I was raised a Catholic and I'm completely anti Catholic these days, for very good reasons.  I noticed you are a Roman Catholic, so I'm not surprised you believe in evolution.

Now, who are the apostles?

[The Barbarian]

9 minutes ago, Dave-regenerated said:

The first post I made here to you I stated I was not going to do some back and forth debate point by point. 

So you're not going to support your claims that statistics rules out evolution or evolution if refuted by thermodynamics.   Let me explain something to you; no one expected that you would.   I'm just making it very clear that we knew.   And I know why.  First, you don't know enough about either to even make an attempt at supporting your claims.    And second, there is no such evidence.  

I think we're done now.

12 minutes ago, Dave-regenerated said:

No I am not an atheist

Well, you answered one question, so that's better than expected.

13 minutes ago, Dave-regenerated said:

I was spiritual born again and regenerated by God over 8 years ago.  I was raised a Catholic and I'm completely anti Catholic these days, for very good reasons. 

Catholics hold that it's not honest to say things you don't know to be true.  So that makes sense.

13 minutes ago, Dave-regenerated said:

I noticed you are a Roman Catholic, so I'm not surprised you believe in evolution.

Christians generally accept the fact of evolution, but not all of us.   There are even some Catholics who don't.   It's just not something that matters to salvation.  

But honest does.    That's good to keep in mind.

 

[Dave-regenerated]

6 minutes ago, The Barbarian said:

So you're not going to support your claims that statistics rules out evolution or evolution if refuted by thermodynamics.   Let me explain something to you; no one expected that you would.   I'm just making it very clear that we knew.   And I know why.  First, you don't know enough about either to even make an attempt at supporting your claims.    And second, there is no such evidence.  

I think we're done now.

Well, you answered one question, so that's better than expected.

Catholics hold that it's not honest to say things you don't know to be true.  So that makes sense.

Christians generally accept the fact of evolution, but not all of us.   There are even some Catholics who don't.   It's just not something that matters to salvation.  

But honest does.    That's good to keep in mind.

 

You know a lot about someone you don't even know.  How does that work?  Do you have super telepathic powers?  I declined to engage in a back and forth with you from the very beginning, not because I can't support my position and give you the facts to back it up, but because it's a waste of time talking to someone that thinks they know it all already.  

You have an extremely condescending tone and manner of speaking to people.  I hope you aren't like that in real life.

We are definitely not done yet.  

I'm sure many people who aren't Catholics also hold that it's not honest to say things you don't know to be true.  

There's many Christians that hold evolution to be true and many that do not.  

Are you a native English speaker?  I'm asking because you sometimes write and say things that don't make a lot of sense.

[Dave-regenerated]

15 minutes ago, The Barbarian said:

So you're not going to support your claims that statistics rules out evolution or evolution if refuted by thermodynamics.   Let me explain something to you; no one expected that you would.   I'm just making it very clear that we knew.   And I know why.  First, you don't know enough about either to even make an attempt at supporting your claims.    And second, there is no such evidence.  

I think we're done now.

Well, you answered one question, so that's better than expected.

Catholics hold that it's not honest to say things you don't know to be true.  So that makes sense.

Christians generally accept the fact of evolution, but not all of us.   There are even some Catholics who don't.   It's just not something that matters to salvation.  

But honest does.    That's good to keep in mind.

 

I would like to know if you believe that Adam and Eve descended from previous ape like creatures.

[The Barbarian]

13 minutes ago, Dave-regenerated said:

I would like to know if you believe that Adam and Eve descended from previous ape like creatures.

Sorry, until you come clean and either support your claims or admit that you had no such evidence, you're done here.

 

[Dave-regenerated]

1 minute ago, The Barbarian said:

Sorry, until you come clean and either support your claims or admit that you had no such evidence, you're done here.

 

Do you mean that you will refuse to answer questions from now on?  That's sad.  I noticed you did that all throughout the thread.  I wonder why that is.  Usually, I have found that when people refuse to answer questions that are very simple and straightforward they just resort of evasion.  This is a notable trait of atheists.  

Again, it's hard to make sense of your words.  I posted a video that I said supported my claims.  All you have to do is watch it and respond.  Trying to force me into doing some useless back and forth debate just isn't going to work.  Nor can you dictate the terms upon which other people respond to you.  

How can I "admit I had no such evidence" when I've very very clearly given you the evidence in the video I posted?  That is what I mean by you write very strangely.  

I don't believe in the THEORY of evolution because it isn't science and there is no evidence for it.  I asked you for transitional fossils and you gave absolutely no evidence whatsoever.  

If you can't give any evidence at all for transitional species, I certainly am done here.  I can see it is completely useless and pointless trying to engage with you.

I am not done here but you are, it seems.  So I will let you respond to this post so you can get the last word in and think you have somehow magically defeated the arguments against your beliefs.  I won't be responding to anything you have to say if you refuse to answer any more questions.

[The Barbarian]

19 minutes ago, Dave-regenerated said:

You know a lot about someone you don't even know.  How does that work? 

People claim to have proof a lot.   The test is whether they can produce it or not.   You lost.

19 minutes ago, Dave-regenerated said:

I declined to engage in a back and forth with you from the very beginning, not because I can't support my position and give you the facts to back it up, but because it's a waste of time talking to someone that thinks they know it all already.  

So when you said that you would show us that evidence, we are to conclude that you knew then that you wouldn't?  

 

 

[The Barbarian]

9 minutes ago, Dave-regenerated said:

Do you mean that you will refuse to answer questions from now on?

I mean it's time for you to start answering questions.   If you didn't actually know any of that stuff, just say so, and you're off the hook.

 

[The Barbarian]

38 minutes ago, Dave-regenerated said:

I'm sure many people who aren't Catholics also hold that it's not honest to say things you don't know to be true.  

Yes, but it's clear enough that were were telling us things you didn't know to be true, which would explain your problems with Catholics.