Floods

[jmwhalen]

Another Christian made the following point:

Many/most(?)evolutionists will accept the proposition that Mars had a world wide flood, with either no evidence of water, or very little evidence of water, on the planet. And yet many/most(?) evolutionists will scoff at the idea that the Earth experienced either a massive "localized" flood, or a world wide flood, as described in Genesis 7-8, despite the fact that the Earth is covered with 2/3 water, and if all the mountains were pushed down and the ocean basins were lifted up, the whole earth would be covered again with water at least a mile and a half deep.

In light of all the water in recent days/months, I thought this may be of interest.

"Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD...." Isaiah 1:18

In Christ,

John M. Whalen

[Inti]

Another Christian made the following point:

Many/most(?)evolutionists will accept the proposition that Mars had a world wide flood, with either no evidence of water, or very little evidence of water, on the planet. And yet many/most(?) evolutionists will  scoff at the idea that the Earth experienced either a massive "localized" flood, or a world wide flood, as described in Genesis 7-8, despite the fact that  the Earth is covered with 2/3 water, and if all the mountains were pushed down and the ocean basins were lifted up, the whole earth would be covered again with water at least a mile and a half deep.

In light of all the water in recent days/months, I thought this may be of interest.

"Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD...." Isaiah 1:18

In Christ,

John M. Whalen

Find me geological proof of massive flooding in Australia please. Then find me geological proof of massive flooding in South America. Then cross reference them so that the date range lies within, ooh lets say 1000 years of each other.

[jmwhalen]

Another Christian made the following point:

Many/most(?)evolutionists will accept the proposition that Mars had a world wide flood, with either no evidence of water, or very little evidence of water, on the planet. And yet many/most(?) evolutionists will

[Token Atheist]

Many/most(?)evolutionists will accept the proposition that Mars had a world wide flood, with either no evidence of water, or very little evidence of water, on the planet.

I have never yet heard anyone claim that Mars had a world wide flood until just now.

Please could you let me know who these "most evolutionists" are who claim this. A few links to "evolutionists" making these claims or endorsing them should be enough.

The only links I can find are some astronomers talking about a patch of water about 4 times the size of Lake Tahoe (hardly a "world wide flood"!) and creationist propaganda sites.

1) Astronomers find what appears to be a lake bed and ravines coming off it on the surface of Mars.

2) Astronomers announce that the ravines may be evidence of a local flood in the area.

3) Creationists claim that "most evolutionists" believe in a "world wide flood" on Mars.

It sounds like you have fallen for a creationist lie, to me...

P.s. Mars has ice caps. There is incontrovertable evidence that there is water on the planet, not "very little" evidence...

[Trust & Obey]

Another Christian made the following point:

Many/most(?)evolutionists will accept the proposition that Mars had a world wide flood, with either no evidence of water, or very little evidence of water, on the planet. And yet many/most(?) evolutionists will  scoff at the idea that the Earth experienced either a massive "localized" flood, or a world wide flood, as described in Genesis 7-8, despite the fact that  the Earth is covered with 2/3 water, and if all the mountains were pushed down and the ocean basins were lifted up, the whole earth would be covered again with water at least a mile and a half deep.

In light of all the water in recent days/months, I thought this may be of interest.

"Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD...." Isaiah 1:18

In Christ,

John M. Whalen

Find me geological proof of massive flooding in Australia please. Then find me geological proof of massive flooding in South America. Then cross reference them so that the date range lies within, ooh lets say 1000 years of each other.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

After you do it for Mars.

[yomotalking]

Many/most(?)evolutionists will accept the proposition that Mars had a world wide flood, with either no evidence of water, or very little evidence of water, on the planet.

I have never yet heard anyone claim that Mars had a world wide flood until just now.

Please could you let me know who these "most evolutionists" are who claim this. A few links to "evolutionists" making these claims or endorsing them should be enough.

The only links I can find are some astronomers talking about a patch of water about 4 times the size of Lake Tahoe (hardly a "world wide flood"!) and creationist propaganda sites.

1) Astronomers find what appears to be a lake bed and ravines coming off it on the surface of Mars.

2) Astronomers announce that the ravines may be evidence of a local flood in the area.

3) Creationists claim that "most evolutionists" believe in a "world wide flood" on Mars.

It sounds like you have fallen for a creationist lie, to me...

P.s. Mars has ice caps. There is incontrovertable evidence that there is water on the planet, not "very little" evidence...

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I too never knew that even evolutionists said that, either.

Someone has got too much time on their hands...

[ecco]

Earth total: 510.072 million sq km

land: 148.94 million sq km

water: 361.132 million sq km

note: 70.8% of the world's surface is under water. I

[jmwhalen]

Many/most(?)evolutionists will accept the proposition that Mars had a world wide flood, with either no evidence of water, or very little evidence of water, on the planet.

I have never yet heard anyone claim that Mars had a world wide flood until just now.

Please could you let me know who these "most evolutionists" are who claim this. A few links to "evolutionists" making these claims or endorsing them should be enough.

The only links I can find are some astronomers talking about a patch of water about 4 times the size of Lake Tahoe (hardly a "world wide flood"!) and creationist propaganda sites.

1) Astronomers find what appears to be a lake bed and ravines coming off it on the surface of Mars.

2) Astronomers announce that the ravines may be evidence of a local flood in the area.

3) Creationists claim that "most evolutionists" believe in a "world wide flood" on Mars.

It sounds like you have fallen for a creationist lie, to me...

P.s. Mars has ice caps. There is incontrovertable evidence that there is water on the planet, not "very little" evidence...

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

____

"I have never yet heard anyone claim that Mars had a world wide flood until just now."

My comment:

Then you have your head stuck in the proverbially sand.

"NASA announces evidence for water on Mars....Not yet definitive"

4 March 2004

NASA announced on Tuesday that their scientists have uncovered evidence that part of Mars was once

[Token Atheist]

"I have never yet heard anyone claim that Mars had a world wide flood until just now."

My comment: 

Then you have your head stuck in the proverbially sand.

"NASA announces evidence for water on Mars....Not yet definitive"

4 March 2004

NASA announced on Tuesday that their scientists have uncovered evidence that part of Mars was once

[other one]

Many/most(?)evolutionists will accept the proposition that Mars had a world wide flood, with either no evidence of water, or very little evidence of water, on the planet.

I have never yet heard anyone claim that Mars had a world wide flood until just now.

Please could you let me know who these "most evolutionists" are who claim this. A few links to "evolutionists" making these claims or endorsing them should be enough.

The only links I can find are some astronomers talking about a patch of water about 4 times the size of Lake Tahoe (hardly a "world wide flood"!) and creationist propaganda sites.

1) Astronomers find what appears to be a lake bed and ravines coming off it on the surface of Mars.

2) Astronomers announce that the ravines may be evidence of a local flood in the area.

3) Creationists claim that "most evolutionists" believe in a "world wide flood" on Mars.

It sounds like you have fallen for a creationist lie, to me...

P.s. Mars has ice caps. There is incontrovertable evidence that there is water on the planet, not "very little" evidence...

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Try enterprisemission.com I have heard Richard C. Hoagland

discuss water on mars for many years......