Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,628
  • Content Per Day:  0.91
  • Reputation:   306
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/23/2020
  • Status:  Offline

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Rick-Parker said:

They were not conservatives. They were progressive. All they wanted to do was conserve their "power." Just live todays "progressives."

Again, you're obviously confused.  They were not, by any stretch of the imagination, progressive.  They resisted change! They were firmly rooted in their dogmatic beliefs, which is why they missed the Savior. 

Edited by JimmyB

  • Group:  Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,628
  • Content Per Day:  0.91
  • Reputation:   306
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/23/2020
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
On 9/9/2022 at 5:09 PM, Jayne said:

Ignorance blended with hatred for the "other side" has been around a LONG time.  Long before Donald Trump, although I will admit he egged it on.  

But so did Obama with his hatred for the right and the Clintons with their hatred for all things conservative.

The left has a lot of folks who champion for the rights of the transgender people  and the non-binary.  I have heard members of the left state that "men can get pregnant".

What they mean is that a woman born a woman but who identifies as a man, when pregnant, is a pregnant man.

The concept of a "pregnant man" has been around at LEAST since 2008 when I first heard of it.  A transgender man [biological female] with a beard, removed breasts, and daily male hormones - but "female" below the waist, stopped her male hormones long enough to get pregnant and touted herself as a pregnant man.  I remember she was exalted by the media for being "male" and "pregnant".

You may not like the article, but I find it believable that about a quarter of those who are quite progressive and far left believe in pregnant "men".

It's the same crowd that promotes and defends transgender females [biological males] as competing on women's sports teams.  The same principle.

 

So you find it believable.  I don't.  It is obviously a statement that is meant to make liberals look stupid.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  15
  • Topic Count:  141
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  4,158
  • Content Per Day:  1.25
  • Reputation:   5,177
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  03/31/2016
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
1 hour ago, JimmyB said:

So you find it believable.  I don't.  It is obviously a statement that is meant to make liberals look stupid.

~sigh~  This is your second time to quote me, JimmyB.

I have explained this as best I can....but here I go again.

SOME liberals support transgender males and females.  To the point where SOME liberals believe transgender females [biological men] should be allowed to play on girls athletic teams.

Why do they believe this?  Because they support their transition and support their change to the point that they call them women.  Like Bruce Jenner.  SOME refuse to refer to Bruce as "he" and will only recognize him as "she".  They are dead serious about this.

It's the same thing with a pregnant "man".  The same liberals - NOT ALL - but SOME fully recognize these women living as men, AS men because these women call themselves "men".  They they choose to get pregnant - they call themselves pregnant "men" and they have SOME support as pregnant "men" by SOME of the liberal who themselves are political correct and support the transgender community.

JimmyB, in this thread you have been very obstinate.  You have refused to see what I have just told you. 

SURELY you are smart enough to recognize that there ARE transgender people in this country - more and more everyday - and surely you are smart enough to know that SOME on the left gives them full support.

Just like I am smart enough to know and state that SOME on the right are ignorant of the truth of many things.

You, on the left, and me, on the right, don't come from "pure" stock.  We both have people on our own sides who err greatly.

Why can't you see that?


  • Group:  Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,628
  • Content Per Day:  0.91
  • Reputation:   306
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/23/2020
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
3 minutes ago, Jayne said:

~sigh~  This is your second time to quote me, JimmyB.

I have explained this as best I can....but here I go again.

SOME liberals support transgender males and females.  To the point where SOME liberals believe transgender females [biological men] should be allowed to play on girls athletic teams.

Why do they believe this?  Because they support their transition and support their change to the point that they call them women.  Like Bruce Jenner.  SOME refuse to refer to Bruce as "he" and will only recognize him as "she".  They are dead serious about this.

It's the same thing with a pregnant "man".  The same liberals - NOT ALL - but SOME fully recognize these women living as men, AS men because these women call themselves "men".  They they choose to get pregnant - they call themselves pregnant "men" and they have SOME support as pregnant "men" by SOME of the liberal who themselves are political correct and support the transgender community.

JimmyB, in this thread you have been very obstinate.  You have refused to see what I have just told you. 

SURELY you are smart enough to recognize that there ARE transgender people in this country - more and more everyday - and surely you are smart enough to know that SOME on the left gives them full support.

Just like I am smart enough to know and state that SOME on the right are ignorant of the truth of many things.

You, on the left, and me, on the right, don't come from "pure" stock.  We both have people on our own sides who err greatly.

Why can't you see that?

Do you actually expect me to respond to this?  If we actually discussed this in person, would you be so rude and insulting?  I won't discuss any subject with anyone who is so hostile toward me.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  15
  • Topic Count:  141
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  4,158
  • Content Per Day:  1.25
  • Reputation:   5,177
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  03/31/2016
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
1 minute ago, JimmyB said:

Do you actually expect me to respond to this?  If we actually discussed this in person, would you be so rude and insulting?  I won't discuss any subject with anyone who is so hostile toward me.

What did I say that was hostile?


  • Group:  Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,628
  • Content Per Day:  0.91
  • Reputation:   306
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/23/2020
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
1 minute ago, Jayne said:

What did I say that was hostile?

"JimmyB, in this thread you have been very obstinate.  You have refused to see what I have just told you."  I will not respond to anyone who calls me obstinate and claims that I refuse to see (meaning agree with you).


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  15
  • Topic Count:  141
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  4,158
  • Content Per Day:  1.25
  • Reputation:   5,177
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  03/31/2016
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
5 minutes ago, JimmyB said:

"JimmyB, in this thread you have been very obstinate.  You have refused to see what I have just told you."  I will not respond to anyone who calls me obstinate and claims that I refuse to see (meaning agree with you).

I'm done here.  I spoke in no hostile manner whatsoever.

 

 


  • Group:  Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,628
  • Content Per Day:  0.91
  • Reputation:   306
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/23/2020
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
19 minutes ago, Jayne said:

I'm done here.  I spoke in no hostile manner whatsoever.

 

 

You need to be more aware of what you write.  Calling someone obstinate and saying that they have refused to see (meaning understand) what you have said is unacceptable.  Bye.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...