David1701 Posted December 10, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 8 Topic Count: 15 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 5,731 Content Per Day: 3.44 Reputation: 3,524 Days Won: 12 Joined: 11/27/2019 Status: Offline Share Posted December 10, 2022 11 minutes ago, S33k3r said: HAARP is not off-topic at all. It is a very legitimate variable in the equation of a Climate Change discussion. *Nobody argues that it doesn't exist in multiple places on the earth. *Nobody argues that it is not functional. *Nobody argues that weather control has not been an aspect of military experimentation for well over half a century now. Why does this topic get deaf-eared every time it is brought up on these discussion boards? Is anybody here a real person who cares to discuss the real possibilities for what is going on in our world? Omegaman was referring to "free will", sin and soteriology as being off-topic; and I agreed with him. What is HAARP? Yes, the military (and others) have been trying to control the weather, for decades. This is well known and no secret. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S33k3r Posted December 10, 2022 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 13 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 164 Content Per Day: 0.29 Reputation: 9 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/05/2022 Status: Offline Share Posted December 10, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, David1701 said: What is HAARP? It is an array of extremely powerful electricity-(radio wave)-generating devices that resemble antennae, but are used for sending signal/electric waves, rather than receiving and is very easily capable of altering weather patterns all over the world via the heating of air in and around weather fronts to direct storms and even increase the intensity of existing storms. There are multiple sites around the world and they've been in operation since pre-Katrina. AFD-111103-026.pdf Edited December 10, 2022 by S33k3r 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David1701 Posted December 10, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 8 Topic Count: 15 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 5,731 Content Per Day: 3.44 Reputation: 3,524 Days Won: 12 Joined: 11/27/2019 Status: Offline Share Posted December 10, 2022 3 minutes ago, S33k3r said: It is an array of extremely powerful electricity-(radio wave)-generating devices that resemble antennae, but are used for sending signal/electric waves, rather than receiving and is very easily capable of altering weather patterns all over the world via the heating of air in and around weather fronts to direct storms and even increase the intensity of existing storms. There are multiple sites around the world and they've been in operation since pre-Katrina. AFD-111103-026.pdf Ah, thanks. I hadn't heard of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omegaman 3.0 Posted December 10, 2022 Group: Graduated to Heaven Followers: 57 Topic Count: 1,546 Topics Per Day: 0.21 Content Count: 10,320 Content Per Day: 1.40 Reputation: 12,324 Days Won: 9 Joined: 04/15/2004 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/05/1951 Share Posted December 10, 2022 6 hours ago, David1701 said: we do always need to be willing to give an answer for the hope that is in us Yeah, lol, but that sounds like a version of 1 Pet 3:15. Which says: Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect. Not saying you are disrespectful, but it is not as if it says to give and answer to those who have NOT asked, and the answer is the reason for the hope you have, not just anything. Are all the boxes checked? (smiles) I would say though, that you could have given an invitation to a thread, where the topic you are bringing up IS the topic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeyondET Posted December 11, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 118 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 2,991 Content Per Day: 1.25 Reputation: 825 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/29/2017 Status: Offline Birthday: 04/01/1968 Share Posted December 11, 2022 9 hours ago, Sparks said: Co2 vanishes thanks to plants. It takes about 7 years to dissipate thanks to plants. I am not sure what 'a few almost extinct period' you are talking about, but God killed off most of the Earth once. We call it the great flood. Co2 takes longer than that, it appears you are referencing methane which is around that long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparks Posted December 11, 2022 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 23 Topic Count: 28 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 6,189 Content Per Day: 2.02 Reputation: 2,520 Days Won: 8 Joined: 01/20/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted December 11, 2022 Just now, BeyondET said: Co2 takes longer than that, it appears you are referencing methane which is around that long. Nope, about 20 different scientific groups say it is an average of 7 years. I already posted this graph. Only the government run IPCC says it is 100 years, which is the punchline to the joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeyondET Posted December 11, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 118 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 2,991 Content Per Day: 1.25 Reputation: 825 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/29/2017 Status: Offline Birthday: 04/01/1968 Share Posted December 11, 2022 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Sparks said: Nope, about 20 different scientific groups say it is an average of 7 years. I already posted this graph. Only the government run IPCC says it is 100 years, which is the punchline to the joke. a certain amount does get recycled. The large amount added by burning fossil elements as a energy source is included in the natural process. the ocean takes up alot from the atmosphere Co2 isn't gone though, coral riffs eat the stuff to, to much causes a bleaching of the creatures and they die off. even plants have a limit they can't just take in large amounts without it effecting the species. Edited December 11, 2022 by BeyondET Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David1701 Posted December 11, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 8 Topic Count: 15 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 5,731 Content Per Day: 3.44 Reputation: 3,524 Days Won: 12 Joined: 11/27/2019 Status: Offline Share Posted December 11, 2022 3 hours ago, Omegaman 3.0 said: Yeah, lol, but that sounds like a version of 1 Pet 3:15. Which says: Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect. Not saying you are disrespectful, but it is not as if it says to give and answer to those who have NOT asked, and the answer is the reason for the hope you have, not just anything. Are all the boxes checked? (smiles) I would say though, that you could have given an invitation to a thread, where the topic you are bringing up IS the topic! Yes, it was taken from 1 Pet. 3:15. Actually, I think that all the boxes are ticked. Was I respectful? Yes, I would say so. Did the other poster ask a question? Not technically; but, he did give his objection to the verse which says that God works all things according to the counsel of his own will, and, since that is part of our hope (confidence for the future), I felt the need to answer his objection with Scripture. Yes, I could have started a thread, but it was late at night (here), I was very tired and I just didn't feel like it, so I fired off a quick response instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparks Posted December 11, 2022 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 23 Topic Count: 28 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 6,189 Content Per Day: 2.02 Reputation: 2,520 Days Won: 8 Joined: 01/20/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted December 11, 2022 11 minutes ago, BeyondET said: a certain amount does get recycled. The large amount added by burning fossil elements as a energy source is included in the natural process. the ocean takes up alot from the atmosphere Co2 isn't gone though, coral riffs eat the stuff to, to much causes a bleaching of the creatures and they die off. even plants have a limit they can't just take in large amounts without it effecting the species. Atmospheric Co2 is not a problem. It's people pretending that C02 is a problem, that is the problem. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeyondET Posted December 11, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 118 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 2,991 Content Per Day: 1.25 Reputation: 825 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/29/2017 Status: Offline Birthday: 04/01/1968 Share Posted December 11, 2022 (edited) 31 minutes ago, Sparks said: Atmospheric Co2 is not a problem. It's people pretending that C02 is a problem, that is the problem. It would be catastrophic for the oil, coal and gas companies for sure if co2 is a problem. I have no doubt they would fight it tooth and nail to save the profits. the reason for the industrial fossil burning rage of the early 19th century, its cheap and easy. electricity was known for quite a bit before liquid and solid fuels. an example the first electric car invented was in 1832 they became usable around 1880, here in 2022 man is going backwards to an invention that it should of continued to develop but easy and cheap and profit is hard to resist. Edited December 11, 2022 by BeyondET Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts