Seventieth Week?Seven Year Tribulation

[Guest prodigaldaughter]

Your right Shadow, I should have reserved my conclusion til a later time of understanding the way ya'll discuss topics. :x:

My mistake....sorry.

So does anyone have an answer to my post regarding the "flood"

and the end thereof shall be with a flood,

and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

Future????? how can it be, when God said no more.

Past??? How since the flood was before Jesus was born.

Oh my??????

Blessings from the Lord God our Saviour to all

[Dad Ernie]

Greetings ProdigalDaughter,

I believe your Daniel reference is also referred to here:

Rev 12:15-16 And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood. 16 And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth.

Blessings,

Dad Ernie

[wordsower]

Prodigaldaughter,

I don't think it's a flood of water.

Isaiah 28:1 Woe to the crown of pride, to the drunkards of Ephraim, Whose glorious beauty is a fading flower Which is at the head of the verdant valleys, To those who are overcome with wine! 2 Behold, the Lord has a mighty and strong one, Like a tempest of hail and a destroying storm, Like a flood of mighty waters overflowing, Who will bring them down to the earth with His hand. 3 The crown of pride, the drunkards of Ephraim, Will be trampled underfoot;

In Is 28:2 when the Assyrians attacked Israel it was described as a flood. So here I believe we see an army that is sent out to destroy Israel except that the earth intervenes and the flood is stopped.

Makes sense to me that this will be a Muslim led army as the Muslims surround Israel and hate Israel and want Jerusalem.

[Guest prodigaldaughter]

Daniel 9:26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

Wordsower...you mentioned

Makes sense to me that this will be a Muslim led army as the Muslims surround Israel and hate Israel and want Jerusalem.

which definitely clicked with me in regards to the scripture saying the above mentioned people of the prince that shall come chall destroy the city and the sanctuary....and the ende thereof shall "be with a flood" not "like a flood" but "with" and unto the end.......

Now...being that the Euphrates river carries a lot of water and if it was closed, or shut down, that could possibly create a flood to some of the land during the time of the attack......

I appreciate both Dad Ernie and you replying and trying to straighten me out....I need all the help I can get.

Love and Peace

[Guest Patty T]

I wonder what the possibility is that Dan 9:27 is a dual prophecy? - Fulfilled by Jesus (God confirming His covenant of the OT) and then yet to be fulfilled.

Patty

[Guest shadow2b]

I wonder what the possibility is that Dan 9:27 is a dual prophecy? - Fulfilled by Jesus (God confirming His covenant of the OT) and then yet to be fulfilled.

Patty

HEEeeeeyyyyyy Patty T----it seems like it could only be speaking of a "future" event as the messiah has already been cutoff but not for Himself--in the previous vs.26---- no one has made a covenant of peace with ISRAEL yet--SO, a sevedn year peace treaty is yet to be signed{confirmed} neither has a peace treaty been broken "in the midst"of the week--3 -1/2 yrs. --in 70 ad the romans destroyed the temple & the temple hasNOT been rebuilt yet--so no sacrifices can be offered until it is rebuilt----

dan.12.vss.11-&-12---- are quite interesting---read those & see if they fit in with 9.27--???? AND look who is blessed after the 1,290 day rule of the anti--ch.---3-1/2 yrs--there is a difference of 45 days in

vss.11--&--12------most interesting----- ------GOD-BLESS------------{Gary}-- :il:

[Guest Patty T]

Patty

HEEeeeeyyyyyy Patty T----it seems like it could only be speaking of a "future" event as the messiah has already been cutoff but not for Himself--in the previous vs.26---- no one has made a covenant of peace with ISRAEL yet--SO, a sevedn year peace treaty is yet to be signed{confirmed} neither has a peace treaty been broken "in the midst"of the week--3 -1/2 yrs. --in 70 ad the romans destroyed the temple & the temple hasNOT been rebuilt yet--so no sacrifices can be offered until it is rebuilt----

dan.12.vss.11-&-12---- are quite interesting---read those & see if they fit in with 9.27--???? AND look who is blessed after the 1,290 day rule of the anti--ch.---3-1/2 yrs--there is a difference of 45 days in

vss.11--&--12------most interesting----- ------GOD-BLESS------------{Gary}-- :il:

[BlindSeeker]

  I always believed that Dan 9:27 was referring to the AC until I started really reading and studying - I believe it also could have been fulfilled by Jesus . . .

Hi Patty T,

I agree, or perhaps maybe I should say "I am persuaded such."

Did you read my post in this thread? It was the 2nd one.

Peace

William

[abbershay]

The covenant isnt Jesus it is from the man of sin....

notice it is not talking about the messiah but about the prince of the people that shall come ....

[BlindSeeker]

The covenant isnt Jesus it is from the man of sin....

notice it is not talking about the messiah but about the prince of the people that shall come ....

Yes, I notice that. But in the Hebrew there is no capitalization or puncuation.

What greater evidence do you have the topic changes from the Jesus to the "anti-christ" than that assumption?