Christian Right Labors to Find

[Marnie]

A group of influential Christian conservatives and their allies emerged from a private meeting at a Florida resort this month dissatisfied with the Republican presidential field and uncertain where to turn.

The event was a meeting of the Council for National Policy, a secretive club whose few hundred members include Dr. James C. Dobson of Focus on the Family, the Rev. Jerry Falwell of Liberty University and Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform. Although little known outside the conservative movement, the council has become a pivotal stop for Republican presidential primary hopefuls, including George W. Bush on the eve of his 1999 primary campaign.

But in a stark shift from the group

[Arthur Durnan]

Thanx. Good article. Bottom line: I'll take Rudy Guiliani over UltraLibDems Clinton, Obama & Biden all rolled together as one. In fact, I believe he's leading the UltraLibDems in one or two polls already. Condoleeza Rice might have been someone else to have looked at because I earnestly believe she would defeat a Clinton. I also believe that Obama will beat Clinton. Maybe Romney as V.P.? What I DON'T want is a UltraLibDem (socialist) President! "Secondary virginity" might indeed be the best term when describing the GOP possibilities because none come close to the current President. What's left will be the "best of the crop," even tho the "crop" falls far, far below what this particular observer would have desired. There was only ONE Ronald Reagan with his famous "Reagan Country!' slogan. And there's only ONE George W. Bush as well. It's still vital that Republican Conservatives work extremely hard to ENSURE a Republican Conservative nominee.

GOD BLESS AMERICA INDEED!

http://arthurdurnan.freeyellow.com

[Leonard]

Condaleeza Rice is, disappointingly, anti-Israel, while Rudy is pro-abortion, anti-gun, etc. Romney? Always been a pro-abort, but in the national spotlight is attempting to 'change his spots' (read: 'lying to us'). McCain? Never met a Lefty 'cause' he didn't like.

John Kyl has--unfortunately--made it very clear he'll not run.

I could not in conscience vote for Guiliani, McCain, or Secretary Rice, or Mitt Romney over Ms. Clinton.

Unless the Republicans run Kenneth Blackman, or MICHAEL SAVAGE (!) I'm sitting this next one out!

"A POX ON BOTH YOUR HOUSES!" Only a Theocracy has my complete loyalty. America was a Church before it was a country.

[kat8585]

Condaleeza Rice is, disappointingly, anti-Israel, while Rudy is pro-abortion, anti-gun, etc. Romney? Always been a pro-abort, but in the national spotlight is attempting to 'change his spots' (read: 'lying to us'). McCain? Never met a Lefty 'cause' he didn't like.

John Kyl has--unfortunately--made it very clear he'll not run.

I could not in conscience vote for Guiliani, McCain, or Secretary Rice, or Mitt Romney over Ms. Clinton.

Unless the Republicans run Kenneth Blackman, or MICHAEL SAVAGE (!) I'm sitting this next one out!

"A POX ON BOTH YOUR HOUSES!" Only a Theocracy has my complete loyalty. America was a Church before it was a country.

But if you don't vote for the lesser of 2 evils, you are helping elect the worse of the 2. Any of rthese

Republicans could do damage, but look at the alternative! Any of them would do much more damage!

[Marnie]

Remember, Reagan was pro-abortion too and later changed his position. It is not unusual to change your position on things are you grow and learn. I don't like Rudy or any of the candidates much. I would vote for Romney, but I agree with what Butero said about Newt. I would vote for him hands down. Unfortunately, he has a personal reputation to live down. Here's hoping the GOP pulls a "Reagan rabbit" out of the hat.

[Giaour]

Mitt Romney is not pro abortion.

Years ago, he lost a family member due to a botched illegal abortion. THAT is why he was pro choice.

He was angry and upset over it which clouded his judgement.

He has since repented and lost his bitterness over the death of the loved one.

He is AGAINST abortion and because he has recently come to terms with it, the media is eating him alive.

[kittyjo]

Condaleeza Rice is, disappointingly, anti-Israel, while Rudy is pro-abortion, anti-gun, etc. Romney? Always been a pro-abort, but in the national spotlight is attempting to 'change his spots' (read: 'lying to us'). McCain? Never met a Lefty 'cause' he didn't like.

John Kyl has--unfortunately--made it very clear he'll not run.

I could not in conscience vote for Guiliani, McCain, or Secretary Rice, or Mitt Romney over Ms. Clinton.

Unless the Republicans run Kenneth Blackman, or MICHAEL SAVAGE (!) I'm sitting this next one out!

"A POX ON BOTH YOUR HOUSES!" Only a Theocracy has my complete loyalty. America was a Church before it was a country.

I been thinking along the same lines myself. All the options are rather unappetizing and make me queasy. If asked what would you like for dinner, you have two options... 1, Rotten fish heads or 2, rotten fish guts... I think I'd have to pass as well.

[abbershay]

Ron Paul is the best guy for the job.

http://reason.com/news/show/118086.html

[The Lorax]

Agreed, Ron Paul is a great man. He's the only candidate who I trust for any kind of fiscal discipline.

I'm sick of Neocons. I'm sick of Democrats. Get Bush out of the office, we need a real Republican. Real Republicans don't rack up massive deficits, they shrink them.

[Marnie]

Agreed, Ron Paul is a great man. He's the only candidate who I trust for any kind of fiscal discipline.

I'm sick of Neocons. I'm sick of Democrats. Get Bush out of the office, we need a real Republican. Real Republicans don't rack up massive deficits, they shrink them.

What do you really think??