Kind of baptism?

[hupo]

So this is the issue that churches are split over........

I will definatly search His Word for enlightment on this topic.

The Holy Spirit's guidance is a must here.

It seems the enemy has found something it can really get to us with

Please remember who is behind this "live grenade" when you post here.

Satan will be extatic if he can get this topic banned once again

Brothers and sisters, Don't fall for satan's trap!!!

Disagree by all means, but do it with Yeshua's Love for each other

Father, I pray for your guidance in this termoil

I pray you be with us all in this forum

I pray you keep us under your wings

I pray you make us see YOUR Love before OUR differences

In your precious son's name I pray

Yeshua, light our way !!

[exrockstar]

My Scriptural basis for suggesting this is found in Acts 2:22. After stating "these people are not drunk" and quoting a prophecy from Joel, he goes on to proclaim the Gospel saying, "This man...you killed, using lawless men to crucify Him. But God raised Him up."

I see nothing in Acts to suggest they behaved in anyway that caused them to appear drunk. Rather, Peter addresses the message they are proclaiming. If anyone can provide Scriptural evidence to the contrary please do so.

i believe, if im reading this correctly, that I am siding with you.

The speech is only for the Jews. People passing by could not understand so they were assume "full of wine."

not that they were drunk but mumbling amongst each other and no one can comprehend.

to get technical...think of a man speaking chinese to a man responding in spanish. that is the way they were communicating.

I can show scirpture on that if you want.

[Floatingaxe]

That's right. That's what we do. However, they were mistakken as drunk! I am sure they must have been acting strangely, maybe laughing a lot! I've seen that a few times!

not that they were literally drunk but were talking communicating amonst each other in their native languages.

read a little earlier in Acts 2:

8And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born?

9Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judaea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia,

10Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes,

11Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God.

people passing by didnt understand a word they all were saying.

when some one really wants to wow their studies they can piece that al these people were Jews and the people

not understanding were Gentiles. ... 3xR0c|<stAr

Could it be that some in the crowd thought the Apostles were drunk because they suddenly appeared on the street proclaiming that a dead man had risen from the grave?

My Scriptural basis for suggesting this is found in Acts 2:22. After stating "these people are not drunk" and quoting a prophecy from Joel, he goes on to proclaim the Gospel saying, "This man...you killed, using lawless men to crucify Him. But God raised Him up."

I see nothing in Acts to suggest they behaved in anyway that caused them to appear drunk. Rather, Peter addresses the message they are proclaiming. If anyone can provide Scriptural evidence to the contrary please do so.

It was simply ignorance of what was happening that people thought they were drunk. Paul stepped up and told them no, it was early in the day for drinking! Then he went on to proclaim Christ crucified and risen all lining up with prophecy, and that Spirit-led prophetic word of Paul pierced through the blindness of 3,000 people that day!

Praise God for His empowerment! It is all about Jesus and nothing to do with us! Amen!

[exrockstar]

It was simply ignorance of what was happening that people thought they were drunk. Paul stepped up and told them no, it was early in the day for drinking! Then he went on to proclaim Christ crucified and risen all lining up with prophecy, and that Spirit-led prophetic word of Paul pierced through the blindness of 3,000 people that day!

Praise God for His empowerment! It is all about Jesus and nothing to do with us! Amen!

it was Peter not Paul.

[Fiosh]

That's right. That's what we do. However, they were mistakken as drunk! I am sure they must have been acting strangely, maybe laughing a lot! I've seen that a few times!

not that they were literally drunk but were talking communicating amonst each other in their native languages.

read a little earlier in Acts 2:

8And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born?

9Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judaea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia,

10Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes,

11Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God.

people passing by didnt understand a word they all were saying.

when some one really wants to wow their studies they can piece that al these people were Jews and the people

not understanding were Gentiles. ... 3xR0c|<stAr

Could it be that some in the crowd thought the Apostles were drunk because they suddenly appeared on the street proclaiming that a dead man had risen from the grave?

My Scriptural basis for suggesting this is found in Acts 2:22. After stating "these people are not drunk" and quoting a prophecy from Joel, he goes on to proclaim the Gospel saying, "This man...you killed, using lawless men to crucify Him. But God raised Him up."

I see nothing in Acts to suggest they behaved in anyway that caused them to appear drunk. Rather, Peter addresses the message they are proclaiming. If anyone can provide Scriptural evidence to the contrary please do so.

It was simply ignorance of what was happening that people thought they were drunk. Peter stepped up and told them no, it was early in the day for drinking! Then he went on to proclaim Christ crucified and risen all lining up with prophecy, and that Spirit-led prophetic word of Peter pierced through the blindness of 3,000 people that day!

Praise God for His empowerment! It is all about Jesus and nothing to do with us! Amen!

Amen.

[exrockstar]

so you guys dont believe there was an acts of tongues there?

[Floatingaxe]

so you guys dont believe there was an acts of tongues there?

What? They spoke in tongues. What do you mean?

[Fiosh]

so you guys dont believe there was an acts of tongues there?

I believe that the Apostles were given the gift of speaking in foreign languages that they had never learned.

[exrockstar]

so you guys dont believe there was an acts of tongues there?

I believe that the Apostles were given the gift of speaking in foreign languages that they had never learned.

so how many different nations were in Acts 2 at that gathering?

[Floatingaxe]

so you guys dont believe there was an acts of tongues there?

I believe that the Apostles were given the gift of speaking in foreign languages that they had never learned.

so how many different nations were in Acts 2 at that gathering?

If you read the text I pasted, you could count it out.