Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,980
  • Content Per Day:  0.29
  • Reputation:   2
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/17/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Well it looks like we can conclude that Adam had no stated responsiblity toward Eve. . . other than to love her.

Don't you folks get it. When God called out in the garden after they fell from grace He called out for Adam not Eve. He ask Adam what He had done first not Eve and it was only after Adam tried to sherk the blame that God turned to the woman. Adam alone was responsible for keeping order in the garden. Gen 3:17 And unto Adam He said "Because you have listoned to the voice to of your wife and have eaten of the tree of which I commanded you saying,' You shall not eat of it.- There is not one shread of biblical evidance that God ever commanded Eve personally not to eat the fruit. Which makes Adam responsible.

Hey, where did God say to Adam, 'You shall not eat it'? God said, He said, (Eve said, God said too...) so show me where the event is recorded.

WHOAPS! Sorry Ovedya, God told Adam 4 times, and Eve at least twice that we know of.

  • Replies 215
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  375
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  11,400
  • Content Per Day:  1.38
  • Reputation:   127
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/30/2002
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  08/14/1971

Posted

He told Adam ALONE first. Then after He told Adam alone, He told them together, 1;29, and Eve's testimony.

...

He told Adam first, then both of them, and then both of them again.

Now He told them three times??!!

Genesis 1:29 is not the commandment!

You are beginning to frustrate me.

1. Three times to Adam.

2. Twice to Eve.

3. You're understanding what I'm, saying. Hurray. Now what are you saying?

4. No one said that 1:29 is the commandment. We've been saying and have numerous times that the prohibiton not to eat of the tree of knowledge of good and evil is encompassed in 1:29, what they could eat because if what they could eat had seed then what they couldn't eat couldn't of had seed.

5. I don't need to know that I'm beginning to frustrate you. Respectfuly, please, take that up with yourself. And next time you get frustrated with me and feel the need to let me know or that's it's necessary that I know then at least pm me in private. There's no need to publicly display your feelings of frustration over me.

This is precisely the source of my frustration, firehill. You and others here are adding to the Word of God something that simply is not there, in order to support a deconstructionist view of the Bible. God told Adam three times and Eve twice. Not only is that unsupported by any Scriptural evidence, it is completely absurd. Your argument had gone so far off into left field simply to support an inconsequential point, that it's ventured into the realm of ridiculousness. Honestly I can hardly take this conversation seriously anymore.

So I'm just going to leave this thread, and you to the delusion which you've constructed for yourself.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,980
  • Content Per Day:  0.29
  • Reputation:   2
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/17/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
This is precisely the source of my frustration, firehill. You and others here are adding to the Word of God something that simply is not there, in order to support a deconstructionist view of the Bible. God told Adam three times and Eve twice. Not only is that unsupported by any Scriptural evidence, it is completely absurd. Your argument had gone so far off into left field simply to support an inconsequential point, that it's ventured into the realm of ridiculousness. Honestly I can hardly take this conversation seriously anymore.

So I'm just going to leave this thread, and you to the delusion which you've constructed for yourself.

What's actualy absurd is taking scripture (Eve's testimony) and just throwing it out the window. :25: That is where the argument begins and you know it.

Thanks for joining though.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  4
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  829
  • Content Per Day:  0.12
  • Reputation:   7
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/25/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/26/1943

Posted

One area that has not been researched is the account of Ananias and Sapphira. If the man was responsible because he was male, then Sapphira would have never even been questioned. Yet, she was and she was punished for agreeing together with her husband. Each was responsible.

This follows along with all the teaching throughout Scripture where each individual is responsible for their own sins, for the consequences of their own beliefs. We cannot say soandso told me to do it so it's his/her fault. We cannot say that the pastor/leader/father/husband/etc. told me to do it so they bear the responsibility and I get off the hook. If we do it then we agree with them even if we think we are obeying an authority who is responsible. Even believing that alone won't get anyone off the hook for doing wrong.

Bottom line, we have no reason anywhere in Scripture that directs us to believe that a husband is responsible for the good or bad actions of his wife, including Adam.


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  679
  • Content Per Day:  0.10
  • Reputation:   14
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  03/02/2007
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
One area that has not been researched is the account of Ananias and Sapphira. If the man was responsible because he was male, then Sapphira would have never even been questioned. Yet, she was and she was punished for agreeing together with her husband. Each was responsible.

This follows along with all the teaching throughout Scripture where each individual is responsible for their own sins, for the consequences of their own beliefs. We cannot say soandso told me to do it so it's his/her fault. We cannot say that the pastor/leader/father/husband/etc. told me to do it so they bear the responsibility and I get off the hook. If we do it then we agree with them even if we think we are obeying an authority who is responsible. Even believing that alone won't get anyone off the hook for doing wrong.

Bottom line, we have no reason anywhere in Scripture that directs us to believe that a husband is responsible for the good or bad actions of his wife, including Adam.

I don't think that anyone has argued that a husband is responsible for his wife's actions. He is responsible for her welfare, both physical and spiritual. That is a different matter entirely. I, as a mother, am responsible for my children's welfare, to keep them fed and clothed and with a roof over their head, for their education in the Lord, for their spiritual welfare, but I am not responsible for their actions. They answer to God for those.

Ruth


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  4
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  829
  • Content Per Day:  0.12
  • Reputation:   7
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/25/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/26/1943

Posted

One area that has not been researched is the account of Ananias and Sapphira. If the man was responsible because he was male, then Sapphira would have never even been questioned. Yet, she was and she was punished for agreeing together with her husband. Each was responsible.

This follows along with all the teaching throughout Scripture where each individual is responsible for their own sins, for the consequences of their own beliefs. We cannot say soandso told me to do it so it's his/her fault. We cannot say that the pastor/leader/father/husband/etc. told me to do it so they bear the responsibility and I get off the hook. If we do it then we agree with them even if we think we are obeying an authority who is responsible. Even believing that alone won't get anyone off the hook for doing wrong.

Bottom line, we have no reason anywhere in Scripture that directs us to believe that a husband is responsible for the good or bad actions of his wife, including Adam.

I don't think that anyone has argued that a husband is responsible for his wife's actions. He is responsible for her welfare, both physical and spiritual. That is a different matter entirely. I, as a mother, am responsible for my children's welfare, to keep them fed and clothed and with a roof over their head, for their education in the Lord, for their spiritual welfare, but I am not responsible for their actions. They answer to God for those.

Ruth

I agree with you Ruth that a husband is responsible for a wifes welfare; physical but not spiritual. God is responsible via the Holy Spirit for everyones spiritual welfare. Husbands are responsible to display godly actions and attitudes, as are wives.

Back to the thread's title. Arguing that Adam is responsible for Eve's sin is indeed arguing that Adam was supposedly responsible for Eve's actions. And as you can see, it isn't true. No one can be responsible for another's choices. We can be responsible for our own choices, including if they influence another. But each person will reap the effects of their choices no matter how they come to them, even if deceived.


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  679
  • Content Per Day:  0.10
  • Reputation:   14
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  03/02/2007
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

One area that has not been researched is the account of Ananias and Sapphira. If the man was responsible because he was male, then Sapphira would have never even been questioned. Yet, she was and she was punished for agreeing together with her husband. Each was responsible.

This follows along with all the teaching throughout Scripture where each individual is responsible for their own sins, for the consequences of their own beliefs. We cannot say soandso told me to do it so it's his/her fault. We cannot say that the pastor/leader/father/husband/etc. told me to do it so they bear the responsibility and I get off the hook. If we do it then we agree with them even if we think we are obeying an authority who is responsible. Even believing that alone won't get anyone off the hook for doing wrong.

Bottom line, we have no reason anywhere in Scripture that directs us to believe that a husband is responsible for the good or bad actions of his wife, including Adam.

I don't think that anyone has argued that a husband is responsible for his wife's actions. He is responsible for her welfare, both physical and spiritual. That is a different matter entirely. I, as a mother, am responsible for my children's welfare, to keep them fed and clothed and with a roof over their head, for their education in the Lord, for their spiritual welfare, but I am not responsible for their actions. They answer to God for those.

Ruth

I agree with you Ruth that a husband is responsible for a wifes welfare; physical but not spiritual. God is responsible via the Holy Spirit for everyones spiritual welfare. Husbands are responsible to display godly actions and attitudes, as are wives.

Back to the thread's title. Arguing that Adam is responsible for Eve's sin is indeed arguing that Adam was supposedly responsible for Eve's actions. And as you can see, it isn't true. No one can be responsible for another's choices. We can be responsible for our own choices, including if they influence another. But each person will reap the effects of their choices no matter how they come to them, even if deceived.

Perhaps I have missed something, or perhaps you have read something that was never there, but I have not heard anyone on this thread attempt to argue that Adam was responsible for Eve's sin, if indeed Eve sinned. As far as I can tell, at the moment of judgment, sin was imputed to Adam and not to Eve - she was deceived - but that is a different matter entirely from suggesting that Adam was responsible for Eve's sin - she didn't sin, she was deceived. Where on earth did you get the idea that anyone is arguing that Adam was reponsible for Eve's sin? According to the Bible she didn't sin - she was decieved, so how could Adam be responsible for that which she is not accused of?

Ruth


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  4
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  829
  • Content Per Day:  0.12
  • Reputation:   7
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/25/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/26/1943

Posted
Perhaps I have missed something, or perhaps you have read something that was never there, but I have not heard anyone on this thread attempt to argue that Adam was responsible for Eve's sin, if indeed Eve sinned. As far as I can tell, at the moment of judgment, sin was imputed to Adam and not to Eve - she was deceived - but that is a different matter entirely from suggesting that Adam was responsible for Eve's sin - she didn't sin, she was deceived. Where on earth did you get the idea that anyone is arguing that Adam was reponsible for Eve's sin? According to the Bible she didn't sin - she was decieved, so how could Adam be responsible for that which she is not accused of?

Ruth

What was she deceived into doing?


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  679
  • Content Per Day:  0.10
  • Reputation:   14
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  03/02/2007
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Perhaps I have missed something, or perhaps you have read something that was never there, but I have not heard anyone on this thread attempt to argue that Adam was responsible for Eve's sin, if indeed Eve sinned. As far as I can tell, at the moment of judgment, sin was imputed to Adam and not to Eve - she was deceived - but that is a different matter entirely from suggesting that Adam was responsible for Eve's sin - she didn't sin, she was deceived. Where on earth did you get the idea that anyone is arguing that Adam was reponsible for Eve's sin? According to the Bible she didn't sin - she was decieved, so how could Adam be responsible for that which she is not accused of?

Ruth

What was she deceived into doing?

You tell me. The Bible is pretty clear and I am sure you can read.

Ruth


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  366
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  10,933
  • Content Per Day:  1.49
  • Reputation:   212
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  04/21/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

One area that has not been researched is the account of Ananias and Sapphira. If the man was responsible because he was male, then Sapphira would have never even been questioned. Yet, she was and she was punished for agreeing together with her husband. Each was responsible.

This follows along with all the teaching throughout Scripture where each individual is responsible for their own sins, for the consequences of their own beliefs. We cannot say soandso told me to do it so it's his/her fault. We cannot say that the pastor/leader/father/husband/etc. told me to do it so they bear the responsibility and I get off the hook. If we do it then we agree with them even if we think we are obeying an authority who is responsible. Even believing that alone won't get anyone off the hook for doing wrong.

Bottom line, we have no reason anywhere in Scripture that directs us to believe that a husband is responsible for the good or bad actions of his wife, including Adam.

I don't think that anyone has argued that a husband is responsible for his wife's actions. He is responsible for her welfare, both physical and spiritual. That is a different matter entirely. I, as a mother, am responsible for my children's welfare, to keep them fed and clothed and with a roof over their head, for their education in the Lord, for their spiritual welfare, but I am not responsible for their actions. They answer to God for those.

Ruth

I agree with you Ruth that a husband is responsible for a wifes welfare; physical but not spiritual. God is responsible via the Holy Spirit for everyones spiritual welfare. Husbands are responsible to display godly actions and attitudes, as are wives.

Back to the thread's title. Arguing that Adam is responsible for Eve's sin is indeed arguing that Adam was supposedly responsible for Eve's actions. And as you can see, it isn't true. No one can be responsible for another's choices. We can be responsible for our own choices, including if they influence another. But each person will reap the effects of their choices no matter how they come to them, even if deceived.

Perhaps I have missed something, or perhaps you have read something that was never there, but I have not heard anyone on this thread attempt to argue that Adam was responsible for Eve's sin, if indeed Eve sinned. As far as I can tell, at the moment of judgment, sin was imputed to Adam and not to Eve - she was deceived - but that is a different matter entirely from suggesting that Adam was responsible for Eve's sin - she didn't sin, she was deceived. Where on earth did you get the idea that anyone is arguing that Adam was reponsible for Eve's sin? According to the Bible she didn't sin - she was decieved, so how could Adam be responsible for that which she is not accused of?

Ruth

Actually Eve did both. She was deceived and fell into sin.

And Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and transgressed.

1 Timothy 2:14 HCSB

God held her personally responsible for both

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...