Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  811
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  7,338
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   76
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

As a team, pastors Randy and Paula White attracted tens of thousands to Without Walls International Church. But behind the picture perfect image, the couple

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  811
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  7,338
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   76
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Here's another slant on this story. I guess this is old news, but it's news to me!
Guest Biblicist
Posted

How very selfish of them. . .

1 Timothy 3:1 Here is a trustworthy saying: If anyone sets his heart on being an overseer [pastor], he desires a noble task. 2 Now the overseer must be above reproach, the husband of but one wife, temperate, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, 3 not given to drunkenness, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money. 4 He must manage his own family well and see that his children obey him with proper respect. 5 (If anyone does not know how to manage his own family, how can he take care of God's church?) 6 He must not be a recent convert, or he may become conceited and fall under the same judgment as the devil. 7 He must also have a good reputation with outsiders, so that he will not fall into disgrace and into the devil's trap.

Guest Biblicist
Posted

Many years ago our beloved pastor wished to resign because is daughter became pregnant out of wedlock. We "voted" to let him stay.

Was that wrong?

1 Timothy 3:4 He must manage his own family well and see that his children obey him with proper respect. 5 (If anyone does not know how to manage his own family, how can he take care of God's church?)


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  811
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  7,338
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   76
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Many years ago our beloved pastor wished to resign because is daughter became pregnant out of wedlock. We "voted" to let him stay.

Was that wrong?

1 Timothy 3:4 He must manage his own family well and see that his children obey him with proper respect. 5 (If anyone does not know how to manage his own family, how can he take care of God's church?)

First of all, if he wanted to resign, it doesn't seem like a vote of the congregation would change his mind. Beyond that, just because his daughter became pregnant doesn't mean he wasn't doing everything in his power to manage his own home. I suppose in a differen't time, he would have demanded that a chaparone be present with her on every date, and maybe that is a custom that should be revived, but no matter how good a Father this man is, there is no way he can guarantee his daughter will never go against the teachings he instilled in her. I would have no problem with him remaining.

I don't think a minister can be responsible for the actions of his adult daughter. If she was in her 20's, say, a chaperon would be ridiculous.

The Biblical guidelines are are guidelines, that's all. They don't mean that a minister has to be sinless and perfect and that his family has to be the same way. We are all sinful, and as long as the minister strives to raise his children in the fear and admonition of the Lord, who can demand for more?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  811
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  7,338
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   76
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
It wasn't that long ago we saw the story involving Charles Stanley and how he told his church if his marriage broke up, he would resign, only to break his word and remain. If the church as a whole fails to hold these people accountable for what they do, and continues to support them regardless, it will only lead to further misconduct on the part of others who will figure that so and so's ministry survived, so mine will too.

Assuming Stanley doesn't remarry, how has he broken Paul's directives? Divorce doesn't disqualify a man from service, adultery does, and there's no adultery in his case. In the case of his church, it was the church's long standing but unwritten policy that divorced men could not hold any kind of office. So, if it was a tradition and not Biblical teaching, then it can change.

Stanley has never hidden his marriage problems and his wife instituted all the separations and she filed for divorce; reconciliation was always what he wanted and what he strove for.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  1,360
  • Topics Per Day:  0.20
  • Content Count:  7,866
  • Content Per Day:  1.16
  • Reputation:   26
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/22/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/18/1946

Posted

It wasn't that long ago we saw the story involving Charles Stanley and how he told his church if his marriage broke up, he would resign, only to break his word and remain. If the church as a whole fails to hold these people accountable for what they do, and continues to support them regardless, it will only lead to further misconduct on the part of others who will figure that so and so's ministry survived, so mine will too.

Assuming Stanley doesn't remarry, how has he broken Paul's directives? Divorce doesn't disqualify a man from service, adultery does, and there's no adultery in his case. In the case of his church, it was the church's long standing but unwritten policy that divorced men could not hold any kind of office. So, if it was a tradition and not Biblical teaching, then it can change.

Stanley has never hidden his marriage problems and his wife instituted all the separations and she filed for divorce; reconciliation was always what he wanted and what he strove for.

I thought they did reconcile.


  • Group:  Members
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Topics Per Day:  0
  • Content Count:  50
  • Content Per Day:  0.01
  • Reputation:   1
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/23/2007
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

It wasn't that long ago we saw the story involving Charles Stanley and how he told his church if his marriage broke up, he would resign, only to break his word and remain. If the church as a whole fails to hold these people accountable for what they do, and continues to support them regardless, it will only lead to further misconduct on the part of others who will figure that so and so's ministry survived, so mine will too.

Assuming Stanley doesn't remarry, how has he broken Paul's directives? Divorce doesn't disqualify a man from service, adultery does, and there's no adultery in his case. In the case of his church, it was the church's long standing but unwritten policy that divorced men could not hold any kind of office. So, if it was a tradition and not Biblical teaching, then it can change.

Stanley has never hidden his marriage problems and his wife instituted all the separations and she filed for divorce; reconciliation was always what he wanted and what he strove for.

Qouting the bible when you are these guys, requires guile (beguilers), these get people to walk after their own lusts. Open violation of scripture is their pardons for donations, how these will get you to worship the beast and his image.

Hebrews 13 (W.Tyndale.N.T)

4 Let wedlock be had in price in all poynts, and let the chamber be undefiled: for whore keepers and advoutrers God will judge.

5 Let your conversation be without covetousness, and be content with that ye have already. For he verily said: I will not fail thee, neither forsake thee:

6 that we may boldly say: The Lord is my helper, and I will not fear what man doeth unto me.

If you Remember them which have the oversight of you, those (that actually) declare onto you the word of God, consider the conversation of thier living and counterfeit their faith. Don't pull out your preacher's image and tell what a good guy he is, a hire ling is a covetous worker at the Sect house (each denomation is a section, Christ is responsible for their such divisions with the word)

Preach faith and not covetousness and you'll see when you read Martayn Luther

Posted

I've never been a fan of Paula White. The glitz of televangelism, no matter who it is, seems to be in opposition to the lowly humility of Yeshua most of the time. Except for programs that are airing a regular time of service, it wouldn't bother me if the whole christian television empire crumbled

That said....I pray for her and her husband to be reconciled and it seems like the only response a christian should have. We must not take an offense and increase it with guile and gossip.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  272
  • Topics Per Day:  0.07
  • Content Count:  2,338
  • Content Per Day:  0.59
  • Reputation:   11
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/19/2014
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Didn't know about this either Marn. Thanks for the info. I've seen her program once or twice but wasn't comfortable with her spiritually. Unfortunately another on a growing list of people in ministry that I find questionable at best.

Charles Stanley is a different story however. His marriage difficulty wasn't kept secret. Obviously we don't know the full details (and shouldn't) but he seems to have sound doctrine

I have growing concern about Perry Stone. His teaching (from what I know) seems accurate but he is a proponent of Paula White, Rod Parsley, Juanita Bynum, etc...Does anyone know?

http://www.voiceofevangelism.org/manna_fest_tv.cfm

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
      • 14 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...