WN: Attack on Iran Said To Be Imminent - NY Sun

[WorthyNewsBot]

In a sign that U.N. Security Council-based diplomacy is losing steam, a number of sources are reporting that a military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities may be imminent. France and America also are pushing for tighter economic sanctions against Tehran, without U.N. approval.

http://www.worthynews.com/news/nysun-com-p...1-v-2671221911/

[nebula]

What a change for France, huh?

[Leonard]

What a change for France, huh?

I will be very surprised if it lasts.

[Guest]

What a change for France, huh?

I will be very surprised if it lasts.

Maybe France finally realized (after all the trouble they had with the Muslims trying to burn Paris down) that mentally unstable people with nuclear weapons (i.e. Iran) is a really bad idea.

I too, will be surprised if it lasts, though.

[kari21]

My guess is France doesn't have a whole lot of money invested in Iran (like they did in Iraq before the war).

[nebula]

I don't know about all of France, but I do know the president they have now is as different from the last one as our differences between a Republican pres. and a Democratic pres.

[boblandis]

It wont accomplish anything.

The ignorant U.S. President and congress, along with backstabbing liberal groups, will just give Iran a few trillion dollars and infinitely better computer technology than they currently have for "reconstruction" after this war happens. Iran will probably end up closer to a nuke than ever before after a U.S. led war.

Not that it would be wrong to attack their nuke facilities, abosulutely lets blow them away right now. But the problem is the U.S. and Europes liberal morons keep giving billions and trillions of dollars to these people after the war every time.

Wow, Why So Blind, don't hold back tell us how you really feel.

[JustinM]

Well, I am so glad France didn't vote in another socialist. I can't even remember his name, that's how influential he was. His legacy will always be the Paris riots. Didn't that go on for more than a month?

All democratic countries must vote in more moderates, it's the only way we can stop the spread of fanatical islam and encourage the spread Freedom. The number 1 obligation of a free nation, is to free nations.

The socialists in the U.S. need to learn that and accept it. If they can't appreciate our responsibilities to the world, perhaps they should move to a nation that doesn't have that obligation.

[amor]

Well, I am so glad France didn't vote in another socialist. I can't even remember his name, that's how influential he was. His legacy will always be the Paris riots. Didn't that go on for more than a month?

All democratic countries must vote in more moderates, it's the only way we can stop the spread of fanatical islam and encourage the spread Freedom. The number 1 obligation of a free nation, is to free nations.

The socialists in the U.S. need to learn that and accept it. If they can't appreciate our responsibilities to the world, perhaps they should move to a nation that doesn't have that obligation.

His name is Chirac and he comes from the same party as his successor, so another Conservative. As to his legacy the riots were a fairly mibnotr affair in isolated suburbs, so had little affect on the majority.

The more tangible legacy, well keeping France out of the quagmire of Iraq, standing up to an overbearing superpower, from a positive perspective and trouncin the fascist, Le Pen in the 2002 presidential runn off. On the negative side, staying for too long, and all the corruption up comming charges dating back to his profligate time as mayor of Paris, before he was elected president.

[amor]

What a change for France, huh?

I will be very surprised if it lasts.

Maybe France finally realized (after all the trouble they had with the Muslims trying to burn Paris down) that mentally unstable people with nuclear weapons (i.e. Iran) is a really bad idea.

I too, will be surprised if it lasts, though.

It's countries with nuclear bombs, and a track record of using them, that insist on their right to go round invading other countries and leaving them in a chaotic and violent state that concern most people in the world. As to burning Paris down, go their you'll find it's all still standing and not suffering from fire damage, which is more than can be said of much of Baghdad. Or indeed New Orleans, perhaps if the US govenment invested a little more on the maintenance of flood defences, and a little less on blowing foreigners to bits, the whole world would be a happier place

Perhaps, you need to dust of your passport and find out what the real world is like