Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  140
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  1,846
  • Content Per Day:  0.27
  • Reputation:   10
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/04/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  01/05/1987

Posted
As to John Coleman, this is his opinion. He has never published anything in any scientific journals on climate. He has never published anything that challenged Anthropogenic Global Warming theory. If it is such a sham, then why does he not do so? Well the answer is simple, he is simply giving his opinion but he has nothing in terms of science to substantiate his opinion with.

By that same measure, if you've never published anything on global warming in peer-reviewed journals, why should we listen to you?

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  158
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  1,763
  • Content Per Day:  0.26
  • Reputation:   7
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/14/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/23/1990

Posted
As to John Coleman, this is his opinion. He has never published anything in any scientific journals on climate. He has never published anything that challenged Anthropogenic Global Warming theory. If it is such a sham, then why does he not do so? Well the answer is simple, he is simply giving his opinion but he has nothing in terms of science to substantiate his opinion with.

By that same measure, if you've never published anything on global warming in peer-reviewed journals, why should we listen to you?

That was mean... but I laughed. Sorry Forrest.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  114
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  4,015
  • Content Per Day:  0.56
  • Reputation:   8
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  12/15/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
As to John Coleman, this is his opinion. He has never published anything in any scientific journals on climate. He has never published anything that challenged Anthropogenic Global Warming theory. If it is such a sham, then why does he not do so? Well the answer is simple, he is simply giving his opinion but he has nothing in terms of science to substantiate his opinion with.

By that same measure, if you've never published anything on global warming in peer-reviewed journals, why should we listen to you?

Because I quote them. I don't pretend to have discovered anything that mainstream science has not, thats why I quote their studies and their published work. I don't just spout off my opinion.

As Mr. Coleman:

Forget science, we got ourselves a conspiracy theorist!

8 Nov 07

Forget any real science, when it comes to right-wing bloggers apparently all it takes to disprove an entire body of scientific evidence is the conspiracy theories of a retired weatherman.

The blog portion of Brett Bozell's Media Research Center, Newsbusters, ExxonMobil funded, echo chamber is today asking, "if the founder of The Weather Channel spoke out strongly against the manmade global warming myth, might media members notice?"

Yesterday, John Coleman, a founder of The Weather Channel, wrote an article for the International Climate and Environmental Change Assessment Project, a right-wing climate change skeptic site, claiming man-made global warming is just a


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  140
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  1,846
  • Content Per Day:  0.27
  • Reputation:   10
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/04/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  01/05/1987

Posted
Because I quote them. I don't pretend to have discovered anything that mainstream science has not, thats why I quote their studies and their published work. I don't just spout off my opinion.

And yet, you reject what other qualified scientists have said against the theory of man-made global warming. :thumbsup:


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  114
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  4,015
  • Content Per Day:  0.56
  • Reputation:   8
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  12/15/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Because I quote them. I don't pretend to have discovered anything that mainstream science has not, thats why I quote their studies and their published work. I don't just spout off my opinion.

And yet, you reject what other qualified scientists have said against the theory of man-made global warming. :thumbsup:

Which ones? If 99 out of 100 scientists agree on something, and one doesn't, and most of the times, that 1% that doesn't has a financial motive for going against the consensus, which one are you going to go with?


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  140
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  1,846
  • Content Per Day:  0.27
  • Reputation:   10
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/04/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  01/05/1987

Posted
Because I quote them. I don't pretend to have discovered anything that mainstream science has not, thats why I quote their studies and their published work. I don't just spout off my opinion.

And yet, you reject what other qualified scientists have said against the theory of man-made global warming. :thumbsup:

Which ones? If 99 out of 100 scientists agree on something, and one doesn't, and most of the times, that 1% that doesn't has a financial motive for going against the consensus, which one are you going to go with?

Are you actually saying that those scientists who do not agree with the theory are only doing so because of a financial motive? Is it possible that those who DO go along with the crowd are the ones who are doing so to gain research funds?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  811
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  7,338
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   76
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Thanks for the post Marnie... :laugh:

You are entirely welcome.

You know, I post "interesting news stories" because I find them interesting. Watching the kids bantering back and forth, while entertaining, is somewhat wearisome, though. If I read the phrase, "peer reviewed" one more time, I'll puke, I swear I will.

Some Christians seem to forget that these verses are in the Bible--

The LORD smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: "Never again will I curse the ground because of man, even though every inclination of his heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I destroy all living creatures, as I have done. "As long as the earth endures,

seedtime and harvest,

cold and heat,

summer and winter,

day and night

will never cease."

--Gen. 8:21-22

Posted
Thanks for the post Marnie... :emot-pray:

You are entirely welcome.

You know, I post "interesting news stories" because I find them interesting. Watching the kids bantering back and forth, while entertaining, is somewhat wearisome, though. If I read the phrase, "peer reviewed" one more time, I'll puke, I swear I will.

Some Christians seem to forget that these verses are in the Bible--

The LORD smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: "Never again will I curse the ground because of man, even though every inclination of his heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I destroy all living creatures, as I have done. "As long as the earth endures,

seedtime and harvest,

cold and heat,

summer and winter,

day and night

will never cease."

--Gen. 8:21-22

Thank you for this Marnie! :emot-fail: Couldn't have said it better.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  114
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  4,015
  • Content Per Day:  0.56
  • Reputation:   8
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  12/15/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Because I quote them. I don't pretend to have discovered anything that mainstream science has not, thats why I quote their studies and their published work. I don't just spout off my opinion.

And yet, you reject what other qualified scientists have said against the theory of man-made global warming. :taped:

Which ones? If 99 out of 100 scientists agree on something, and one doesn't, and most of the times, that 1% that doesn't has a financial motive for going against the consensus, which one are you going to go with?

Are you actually saying that those scientists who do not agree with the theory are only doing so because of a financial motive? Is it possible that those who DO go along with the crowd are the ones who are doing so to gain research funds?

Are you saying that Exxon would not pay for research that challenged Anthropogenic Global Warming?

I am saying that most that go against the concensus have an obvious financial motive. Some don't, but there is never a 100% agreement on any emerging science.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  45
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  819
  • Content Per Day:  0.12
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

What is Mr. Coleman's theory on why the polar ice caps appear to be shrinking? I've watched the NASA Channel footage which show the progressive recession of the ice over time enough to realize something's up. Is it a totally natural cycle or should we not pay attention and do what we can to prevent/curtail any man-made problems?

Who can actually say they support the production of so called "Green House" gases?

Supposedly, the earth was covered with volcanic dust a zillion years ago with absolutely no ice on its surface, but then became a snowball. There wasn't any cars or aerosol cans back then.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...