Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  811
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  7,338
  • Content Per Day:  1.03
  • Reputation:   76
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Have you ever had a friend who was the holder of some bad ideals, but you were grateful for a time that they showed you kindness and compassion? I had a friend who supported my family with gifts and support during a time when my paycheck stopped because the employer went bankrupt. I developed a close relationship with this man, and spent a lot of time with him when I was in my early 20s. He became a friend of the family. I am 43 now, and the man has some cooky ideas and ways of relating with people. He is considered a con artist by some. But, I am still grateful for his friendship in the past. I will entertain a relationship with him still whenever he is around. I just separate myself from his activities. But I won't deny what he has done or my love for him. He can be a strong liability for someone like myself in ministry who has to protect his reputation and public perception.

I think that's a good example of what I believe the situation between Wright and Obama to be.

There is no doubt they have known each other for a long time, and have gone through a lot

as friends (baptisms, marriage etc). Obama obviously doesn't agree with everything Wright

has said, but is still a friend of his because he sees the good in him.

The problem is, BHO put this wacky pastor on his campaign staff. This says to me that at the very least BHO has no clue about "discretion" and the "appearance of impropriety." How can I trust him to make a good choice of, say, some major cabinet position should, G-d forbid, he gets elected when he puts a controversial figure like this on his staff now? And at the very worst is says that at someplace deep down inside, BHO agrees with wacky Wright.

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  196
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  1,343
  • Content Per Day:  0.21
  • Reputation:   12
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  01/15/2008
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/03/1964

Posted
Have you ever had a friend who was the holder of some bad ideals, but you were grateful for a time that they showed you kindness and compassion? I had a friend who supported my family with gifts and support during a time when my paycheck stopped because the employer went bankrupt. I developed a close relationship with this man, and spent a lot of time with him when I was in my early 20s. He became a friend of the family. I am 43 now, and the man has some cooky ideas and ways of relating with people. He is considered a con artist by some. But, I am still grateful for his friendship in the past. I will entertain a relationship with him still whenever he is around. I just separate myself from his activities. But I won't deny what he has done or my love for him. He can be a strong liability for someone like myself in ministry who has to protect his reputation and public perception.

I think that's a good example of what I believe the situation between Wright and Obama to be.

There is no doubt they have known each other for a long time, and have gone through a lot

as friends (baptisms, marriage etc). Obama obviously doesn't agree with everything Wright

has said, but is still a friend of his because he sees the good in him.

The problem is, BHO put this wacky pastor on his campaign staff. This says to me that at the very least BHO has no clue about "discretion" and the "appearance of impropriety." How can I trust him to make a good choice of, say, some major cabinet position should, G-d forbid, he gets elected when he puts a controversial figure like this on his staff now? And at the very worst is says that at someplace deep down inside, BHO agrees with wacky Wright.

Now that is a very viable point Marnie

Posted
Have you ever had a friend who was the holder of some bad ideals, but you were grateful for a time that they showed you kindness and compassion? I had a friend who supported my family with gifts and support during a time when my paycheck stopped because the employer went bankrupt. I developed a close relationship with this man, and spent a lot of time with him when I was in my early 20s. He became a friend of the family. I am 43 now, and the man has some cooky ideas and ways of relating with people. He is considered a con artist by some. But, I am still grateful for his friendship in the past. I will entertain a relationship with him still whenever he is around. I just separate myself from his activities. But I won't deny what he has done or my love for him. He can be a strong liability for someone like myself in ministry who has to protect his reputation and public perception.

i have had employers who held "bad ideals" and I needed the paycheck so I was quiet. I have had friends with bad ideals....I vigorously opposed them privately and/or publicly.

But a pastor??? Someone in charge of being a spiritual leader for my family and spewing racist hatred???

No how...no way. I've been in a couple of church services where similar ignorance was spewed and got out the door immediately. To be silent about that kind of bigotry is to be guilty.

If he stays at this church for a service...no big deal...but 20 years? He's just as guilty.

.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  272
  • Topics Per Day:  0.07
  • Content Count:  2,338
  • Content Per Day:  0.59
  • Reputation:   11
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/19/2014
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Am I mistaken that he hadn't called Wright his "former pastor" before? Is it even possible to sit under anyone's leadership for that long and NOT ascribe to their beliefs? IMO he's only speaking out against it now because it's been exposed and it's political suicide for him to not do so.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.73
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.76
  • Reputation:   2,254
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted
Comment 1:

Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a hall that still stands across the street, a group of men gathered and, with these simple words, launched Americas improbable experiment in democracy.

Reminds me of the Gettysburg Address.

Comment 2:

It was stained by this nations original sin of slavery, a question that divided the colonies and brought the convention to a stalemate until the founders chose to allow the slave trade to continue for at least twenty more years, and to leave any final resolution to future generations.

All right, this is a pet peeve of mine.

If you think you have had it bad, Mr. Obama, because of your black skin, why don't you hop in your fancy car and take a drive to our nation's Native American reservations and spend some time with a people who also had their freedom taken away and but also have been lied to; forced to live in impoverished segregation; been stripped of their pride and dignity; grew up surrounded by alcoholism, drug abuse and a high suicide rate; are lost in hopelessness; and forgotten by American society.

You, Mr. Obama, are the son of an immigrant and a white American and live in affluence. What do you know of this kind of suffering?

Comment 3:

Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes.

That's not the impression we were given in your statements before. Did you not state you were shocked to hear such things?

Comment 4:

Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely - just as I'm sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.

It appears, though, that they didn't bother you all that much. I would never sit under a pastor who spewed hatred like this.

I mean, this isn't even "Hate the sin, love the sinner" speak. This is "Kill the sinner!"

Comment 5:

Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country - a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam.

Very good! I am glad you admit this.

Comment 6:

But the truth is, that isn't all that I know of the man....

All right, Obama, I can understand the things you have said here.

Unfortunately, this comes after previous controversies associated with you and your wife: with you regarding the pledge and the American flag pin, with your wife regarding the "never been proud of America before" comment.

It does leave people leery of trusting your words at face value like this.

(I need to go now, so I won't be able to comment on the rest of this speech.)

Have you ever had a friend who was the holder of some bad ideals, but you were grateful for a time that they showed you kindness and compassion? I had a friend who supported my family with gifts and support during a time when my paycheck stopped because the employer went bankrupt. I developed a close relationship with this man, and spent a lot of time with him when I was in my early 20s. He became a friend of the family. I am 43 now, and the man has some cooky ideas and ways of relating with people. He is considered a con artist by some. But, I am still grateful for his friendship in the past. I will entertain a relationship with him still whenever he is around. I just separate myself from his activities. But I won't deny what he has done or my love for him. He can be a strong liability for someone like myself in ministry who has to protect his reputation and public perception.

Ddavid -

You as well as everyone else have missed something in what I said.

All this talk about racial problems have been focused on American black slavery and discrimination against blacks since then.

But what about the Native Americans?

And what ancestry does Obama have with slavery in America?

Likewise, with the suspicions of his loyalty beginning not with his pastor - his spiritual mentor - but with his own actions and with his wife's words, why should any of us feel happy and OK with a very well-crafted speech?

As for what you focused on (my last comment), like Yod pointed out, this is the man's pastor, not just a friend. And this congregation he belonged to cheered passionately over the pastor's words. What does that tell you?


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  2,153
  • Content Per Day:  0.32
  • Reputation:   166
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  02/02/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/05/1985

Posted
Am I mistaken that he hadn't called Wright his "former pastor" before? Is it even possible to sit under anyone's leadership for that long and NOT ascribe to their beliefs? IMO he's only speaking out against it now because it's been exposed and it's political suicide for him to not do so.

He's certainly speaking about it because people brought it up, obviously people brought up a concern, and it only makes sense to address something that is troubling people. :emot-hug:

If Barack wanted to avoid all forms of political suicide, I think he would have put as much distance between himself and the pastor as he could. After hearing the speech, he didn't do this, and instead of trying to run away from the issue with his tail between his legs, he elaborated upon his reasoning. I respect that a lot more.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  34
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  1,673
  • Content Per Day:  0.25
  • Reputation:   111
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/21/2007
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Have you ever had a friend who was the holder of some bad ideals, but you were grateful for a time that they showed you kindness and compassion? I had a friend who supported my family with gifts and support during a time when my paycheck stopped because the employer went bankrupt. I developed a close relationship with this man, and spent a lot of time with him when I was in my early 20s. He became a friend of the family. I am 43 now, and the man has some cooky ideas and ways of relating with people. He is considered a con artist by some. But, I am still grateful for his friendship in the past. I will entertain a relationship with him still whenever he is around. I just separate myself from his activities. But I won't deny what he has done or my love for him. He can be a strong liability for someone like myself in ministry who has to protect his reputation and public perception.

yeah, kids face these every day. many call them gangs. they cause trouble, do no good, and some do drugs and many deal them.

we tell kids to stay away from them. Definitely dont hang around them for many years.

if kids can take this advice so can grown people.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  196
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  1,343
  • Content Per Day:  0.21
  • Reputation:   12
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  01/15/2008
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/03/1964

Posted
Am I mistaken that he hadn't called Wright his "former pastor" before? Is it even possible to sit under anyone's leadership for that long and NOT ascribe to their beliefs? IMO he's only speaking out against it now because it's been exposed and it's political suicide for him to not do so.

I would prefer to believe he is weighing the cost of his total separation from this past association. Knowing the damage is done and regardless of his action now he is tied to these comments. So, he is taking what is the high road in his opinion of appearing human and being loyal to the one who introduced him to Christainity. How, would you like to be in the position? I don't really perceive Obama to be a man of deep personal spiritual conviction, perhaps a baby Christian, who never had the benefit of spiritual meat. Interesting side note, he is probably glad at least to be shed of the Muslim argument, Now he is a racist by association and not a terrorist :emot-hug:


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  2,153
  • Content Per Day:  0.32
  • Reputation:   166
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  02/02/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/05/1985

Posted

Nebula, I don't really get why talking about native americans should have been a point in his speech.

He spoke in order to address the concerns certain people had about his history in an alleged racially discriminatory church. The church was a black church. Why should he have talked about native americans? I mean, yes they were persecuted, but it has nothing to do with why people are holding him up to the fire today :emot-hug:

As for his unpatriotic "actions", speaking about patriotism instead of wearing a pin, or singing instead of putting a hand over your heart hardly seems like credible evidence for proving he doesn't love the country.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  272
  • Topics Per Day:  0.07
  • Content Count:  2,338
  • Content Per Day:  0.59
  • Reputation:   11
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/19/2014
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Am I mistaken that he hadn't called Wright his "former pastor" before? Is it even possible to sit under anyone's leadership for that long and NOT ascribe to their beliefs? IMO he's only speaking out against it now because it's been exposed and it's political suicide for him to not do so.

He's certainly speaking about it because people brought it up, obviously people brought up a concern, and it only makes sense to address something that is troubling people. :laugh:

If Barack wanted to avoid all forms of political suicide, I think he would have put as much distance between himself and the pastor as he could. After hearing the speech, he didn't do this, and instead of trying to run away from the issue with his tail between his legs, he elaborated upon his reasoning. I respect that a lot more.

If he genuinely disagrees with such positions he would have distanced himself before it became a public issue instead of waiting for it to be exposed. He is many things no doubt but I see little if any sincerity in his words. I don't claim to know his heart either though.

Am I mistaken that he hadn't called Wright his "former pastor" before? Is it even possible to sit under anyone's leadership for that long and NOT ascribe to their beliefs? IMO he's only speaking out against it now because it's been exposed and it's political suicide for him to not do so.

I would prefer to believe he is weighing the cost of his total separation from this past association. Knowing the damage is done and regardless of his action now he is tied to these comments. So, he is taking what is the high road in his opinion of appearing human and being loyal to the one who introduced him to Christainity. How, would you like to be in the position? I don't really perceive Obama to be a man of deep personal spiritual conviction, perhaps a baby Christian, who never had the benefit of spiritual meat. Interesting side note, he is probably glad at least to be shed of the Muslim argument, Now he is a racist by association and not a terrorist :emot-hug:

Being loyal to the one who introduced him to Christ is one thing. Running for President with a person on his staff who has such obvious hatred for this country is a different issue entirely.

I certainly don't envy his position but it's not my character and integrity that's in question.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...