Jump to content

thomas t

Senior Member
  • Posts

    944
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

170 Neutral

About thomas t

  • Birthday 04/20/1980

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    https://t-apologetics.jimdofree.com/

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Bamberg, Germany
  • Interests
    I left this board, but I wish you a pleasant continuation.

Recent Profile Visitors

4,019 profile views
  1. I’m a bit worried. On this board atheists get called names. In the main sections. Someone said: "The Bible says anyone who looks at creation and denies there is a God is a fool. Not my words." * And they cannot reply. If atheists are as foolish as the members of this board keep claiming…. Wouldn’t it be more than easy to answer them in the main sections? Why the brick wall then? (I mean I know the reasons. It was too difficult to answer them among other things.) Nonbelievers might see this and refrain from converting, I’m afraid. I mean some of them might convert, but others who normally would…. might not, I’m afraid. Fairness is the mother and the father of successful debating, I think. However, talking about others while not letting them reply…. is this fair? Prohibiting someone from replying is one thing. Not letting someone reply while talking about them is still another, in my view. Regards, Thomas * see
  2. Thank you for your point of view. His message says we should make disciples. This entails sitting down with non-believers and newbies in the faith... talking to them. Each of them on a personal level, since discipleship is something very personal and every individual is a very special disciple on their own, I think. So you can't take away the personal conversation to non-believers and/ or seekers. Well, Jesus could do this on his own, however... this is our job as scripture says. And I promise: it is such a great and fruitful activity. If Jesus, the Savior of the world as you say, helps. So, I mean the conversation with atheists and other non-believers..... are you satisfied with it during the last say 2 years? Thank you for answering. Thomas
  3. Dear community, George in particular, soon after all non-believers were transferred to the special invisable subsection on Worthy, I left. I wanted to talk and share the Gospel to non-believers.... under equal conditions, equal in a sense that they can post in public, too. On another board, I could talk to many non-believers for quite a long time before I got censored ... and I found this was a winning activity. Spreading the Good News is the best thing to do for me. Jesus is the best news for everyone, I believe, and I did talk to many that were more than open to learn more about it. So let me ask you, how does evangelisation on Worthy work out today? Do you evangelize? Shalom, Thomas
  4. actually, the graph shows that temperatures today are hotter than decades ago. That's my point. Nothing more. for the forests, all that matters is how the trees are experiencing the climate change that you deem hardly significant... scientists see a link between rising temperatures and damaged trees (see second source in my last post, see also the linked source of this post. Both in German language however, I should research to find something in English language?). If for the trees, a rise by 0.6 degrees is partially deadly, then we see more patches of dead trees simply. see graph below see second graph below, it shows damaged trees in red colour, trees in risk of being damaged, and trees that are ok (green colour). Source (click here, see page 9). I don't think so, I didn't exaggerate. I've shown the truth. I tried to demonstrate the situation of forests in Germany which is where I live today. I hope, you'll find the information of this post more convincing now that you see scienists' evaluation on trees. I'm not cool. No bias. I've shown you what I see every day when I go running in the forest. I'm sad every day when I see these dying trees. Thomas
  5. Hi Argosy, here we agree. Let's have a look at the global temperature increase (see below): So, global temperatures increasing, there will be *hot* weather extremes, in my opinion. Very logic, isn't it? Actually, Germany is quite blessed with a moderate climate. Normally. Nevertheless, we're having problems with drought related to temperatures getting warmer. See photo below: (source in German language click here, it's a public news channel.) Germany is sad that their forests look like that nowadays. Thomas
  6. that's really off topic now. But to answer your questions, I believe that Jesus saved me (like other Christians believe, too). I believe that when I converted, Jesus took my sin and burnt everything.
  7. Hi other one no. Hi Appy, I overlooked your post, Now I see it. no, absolutely no. I neither say the one thing nor the other. I never said this. Criticism on the subject level? Yes. Regards, Thomas
  8. Angels, so I was born in iniquity. And then Jesus came. ... one last thing: if you would have said: Greta is used by the devil just like anyone else is (or at least some vast majority of people is).. I wouldn't have intervened at this point. Regards, Thomas.
  9. Hi Angels, thanks for your explanation. I'm not into theology too much. Maybe it's right. After all, I'm not a prophet who can see how Satan is using specific people, so I have no idea. However, my point was narrowing this down to one single person saying that Satan has a special occupation for her, which is my point of concern. But Steve doesn't want to have this debate here in this thread, if I understand everything he has said. I mean... if narrowing down Satan's alleged plans and relationships to one single girl and if this is stepping too far or not. Best regards, Thomas
  10. Hi Appy, I thought about it. In my opinion, it all comes down to the following question: When you say that everything a person does is evil/ inflienced by Satan or satanic... does this NOT mean AT ALL that the person IS evil? In my opinion, this is debatable. Whether or not this statement makes any sense... is a question that I shouldn't deal with in this thread. I was told by the moderator, if I get him right. You further seem to argue here that indicating that Satan uses her for a very special plan - which is the New World Order - is not the same as claiming that she and Satan share a very special common relationship indeed. If this makes sense is debateable again, I think. But Steve, if I understand him right in this aspect too, doesn't want this question to be debated here in this thread. Because if you dabate this, you would be debating if this is getting too far ... and the mod doesn't want to have this debate here, if I understand him here. I fully respect his decision. So I won't give any further comment on this. I'll stick to what he says, Thomas
  11. Hi Steve, thank you for your comments. Yes, your rules are good. I never meant to discuss her as a person and I will stick to the rules you told me. maybe I should turn away from what Sonshine has said. There is something else we could read in the thread. The enemy is Satan. So, Appy, would you say that this is linking her to Satan? Or how would you describe this? How would you feel, if I say "you are used by Satan!" Hi Angels. I permitted myself to quote something from you. This does not mean that I want to discuss you as a person. I was just quoting you and then asked a question about your quote as to how Appy would interpret what you say. Nothing against you, ok? It's about what you have said. Regards. Thomas
  12. Hi Angels, I criticised her on the subject level. Nothing more. That's not an accusation, as I don't want her being punished. And it's not getting personal. I have nothing against her as person. God could bless her today and I wouldn't protest in any regard. By the way, I was wrong in one regard. I said that I was wrong this morning concerning Greta having coauthored that book... and then for me this is settled. some Christians in this thread just didn't stick to the rule "don't judge" as cited above. Let's keep God's commandments. I am encouraging others to take God's commandments fully seriously. Why not. During the last debate I had on insulting others here, one poster made up the idea that insulting was a sign of strength, when it is not. It was here, but George subsequently deleted the whole thread... We really need to stick to the rule that judging is up to God, in my opinion. Thomas
  13. Hi OtherOne I think you're being euphemistic, here. Let's look at the post in detail: Actually, when @Sonshine☀️ says that Satan is behind what Greta is doing all day long, she (it's a she, btw.) links Greta closer to Satan than anybody else. And this is exactly where Sonshine is getting personal in my view. In my opinion, protecting the climate happens to be Greta's No.1 occupation. That's what she does day in day out. And poster Sonshine was referring to it. It's the same when you would call all music as an act of Satan. I happen to be a musician. When you link all music to Satan, you're linking my professional identity to Satan, too. Furthermore, her post was in answering whether or not the replies here were “hatred and derision at this poor girl;” - not "at this poor mobement". This post was addressing her as a person, I think. Sonshine argued that, because Satan was behind what she is doing, remarks against Greta is "the ready-to-fight stane of watching Christians". That's the post in question LINK. Before, we saw comments like this: "The kid's [...] silly beyond belief," Click Here . So, Sonshine seems to approve of all this, and this is what I can't understand. We shouldn't go around insulting everyone. Jesus set up clear rules how to deal with people outside the church: Don't judge Mt 7:1. Sonshine tries to set up a new rule, as it seems. A rule saying that, when Satan seems to be behind what someone is doing, insulting her is perfectly fine. And that's where I think the proble lies. Let's take Jesus' commandments fully seriously please. Let him be the author of our behavior. Let's avoid new rules - Bible is clear enough and Jesus should be the king. Regards, Thomas
  14. Hi Ayin, ok, it's a coauthored book. Point given. However, she distanced herself from that one. Did you see my link? The false news as of today is pretending she still claims to be able to see invisible co2. What more should she do to distance herself from that claim? She did all she could do. In my opinion, your link provides falsehood because they published their text three days after Greta's comment on this claim. Just a question, what do you do when you notice what I would call personal attacks against Greta Thunberg in this very thread? You are a moderator... Hi Sonshine, linking her to Satan is getting personal. For the policy of this board, she can't reply in this thread. Even if she wanted to. As you may know, atheists can't reply here (I am assuming she is an atheist). Getting personal against people who can't reply is twice as harmful, I think. Thomas
  15. Angels, this is fake news. Your source didn't back up their claim. Just her mother saying she can see it doesn't mean that Greta also claims she can see it. It's fake news like all other fake news. However, you've made your readers believe it was truth. For your knowledge, click here(LINK) to see Greta Thunberg's comment on that one. Regards, Thomas
×
×
  • Create New...