2 types of Gays

[OneLight]

The title is deceiving.  There are not two types of gays, but different gay agendas.   Being gay is just finding no issues with treating the same gender as your mate.  I have known gays who nobody would ever expect them to be gay if they did not tell you (unless you have discernment), and I have known gays who wear it as a banner of pride, each with their own agenda.  I am sure there are more than two agendas when you take a closer look.

[Guest Butero]

 

 

 

 

If you don't consider that an assault on the bible as well as Christianity or Gods view of right from wrong then I suppose we simply disagree.

 I'm sorry, but I do not understand why I should be upset or feel my Christian faith is under assault because a group of people want to make their own version of the Bible. Many people throughout history have twisted the words of the Bible to justify how they live or what they do. I do not nor have I ever felt that my faith or what I believe  threaten by this. In other words, I may not like what they are saying, may disagree with what they are saying, but in no way do I feel they are going to be threat to my own personal faith.

 

see, that how I feel too. Although people shouldn't mess with the word,

 

"Ye shall not add unto the Word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it" (Deuteronomy 4:2).

"Add thou not unto His words, lest He reprove thee, and thou be found a liar" (Proverbs 30:5, 6)

 

it don't effect my faith, an what adult people do in their own time and place, is none of my buisness, unless they building missiles in their basement or something. It pretty obvious just from the cover of the Queen James bible it prolly supposed to be sattire, not sure why anyone would take it as serious. 'Lolcat' bible look like fun, bunch of memes an stuff, maybe Lolcat just an embodyment of Longcat (shrug).

 

Lest we forget that the King James Bible is called the King James Bible because King James wanted his own version of the  Bible, along with his own version of Christianity to allow for his own divorce and remarriage.  Millions of people have still been reached by that Bible and millions of Protestants are still extremely anti-Catholic!  The Queen James Bible still has all the passages about creation, all the passages about Jesus Christ, all the passages about salvation.  It even still contains all the passages about homosexuality, but translated differently.  Isn't it wonderful that all these people who otherwise wouldn't read the Bible now may and so now may be reached, and may go so far as to return to the original Greek of the passages about homosexuality and, with the prayerful guidance of the Holy Spirit which this Queen James Bible should still correctly lead them to, decide for themselves what is the truer translation?

 

King James authorized a translation of the Bible because the only known English versions were slanted with an anti-Catholic bias.  He wasn't looking for a translation that would suit his fancy.  Those who did the work created the most accurate translation possible, given the fact they had to go from Hebrew and Greek to English, and at times, it made it hard coming up with a word that was absolutely accurate.  You might have 3 or 4 Greek words that could only be translated to a single English word. 

 

I don't see anything good about the QJV Bible.  It is an abomination, as it distorts scripture to cater to homosexuals.  It was not created for the sake of accuracy.  I will stick with my 1611 King James Bible and my Authorized King James Bible when posting.  I know they came from the Textus Receptus manuscripts, and are fully trustworthy.. 

 

As far as the OP goes, "2 Types of Gays," if someone is gay, and living next door to me, I wouldn't seek to do them any harm, run them off, or be mean to them.  They can mind their own business, and I will tend to my affairs.  At the same time, if they start pushing a homosexual rights agenda, I will openly stand against it.