Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  764
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  7,626
  • Content Per Day:  1.64
  • Reputation:   1,559
  • Days Won:  44
  • Joined:  10/03/2012
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

 

 

I do not believe it's insensitive to ask that breastfeeding mothers cover themselves in public.

 

And that is your opinion and option to do so brother. Which is a valid opinion or position to take. :thumbsup:

 

However, nursing mothers can have a different belief. In many instances according the the law in the U.S. in many instances she is exempt from doing so.

 

God bless,

GE

 

 

 

 

 

 

You know, to be totally honest, I really don't care what nursing mothers do. It doesn't bother me. Never did.

 

But what I see in your post is that you're attempting to bypass scripture using the laws of the world.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Where does personal comfort trump the Word?

 

I'm thinking I need a break from this thread. Man I have one last question for you. By your statement here... Are you trying to be the Holy Spirit in people's lives? Let me rephrase: Are you saying that if someone disagrees with you on this they are unilaterally practicing evil? That there is no room for agreement on this issue? :help:

 

 

 

Personal attack?   You must be really mad.

 

 

:bored-1:

 

Yes, I'm not surprised you're not really interested in the subject matter. I will admit I'm frustrated you're not reading what I write and responding only to sections of what I say (particularly the last few sentences). How am I bypassing Scripture? I brought up the passage you quoted in Romans 14 today at 1:28pm U.S. Central time. Actually I had been studying it on August 11th.

 

I said specifically that I'm not advocating ignoring weaker brothers and sisters in Christ. I do believe that we should consider those who struggle in the faith. Loving God and loving people is to be our guide. How that looks to each person in their culture, etc. can be different. :thumbsup:

I also am asking for compassion to be shown to nursing women.

I said I'm trying to find a balance. :thumbsup:

 

 

Please read before commenting further! :)

 

I’d like to make some clarifications here. I’m not trying to advocate a woman shouldn’t try to be discreet when breastfeeding. I’m not advocating a woman going topless. I’m not advocating ignoring weaker brothers and sisters in Christ.

I do believe we should in fact follow Scripture and consider weaker brothers and sisters in the faith. I do believe that loving God and loving people is the command that is to be our guide.

I’m simply advocating being sensitive to nursing mothers and the babies involved.

 

People are people no matter how small.

<snip>

 

All I’m wanting to do is to point back to the idea that instead of demanding women to be covered (which most women try to do anyway) we should lovingly, gently, and compassionately consider their needs (and those of the baby) too. A little kindness and compassion goes a long way.

 

<snip>

There needs to be a balance. I’m trying to find that balance.

So this is where I’m coming from in this discussion.

 

 

This second quote is not a personal attack. I am not mad at all. I will ask again directly. I will put the question at the end since this is typically what you respond to. Are you saying the Bible (based on the passages you quoted) is crystal clear that a woman should always cover herself when nursing in every circumstance and every culture?

 

I'm taking a break from this thread for a bit.

 

God bless,

GE

Posted

Yes, I'm not surprised you're not really interested in the subject matter. I will admit I'm frustrated you're not reading what I write and responding only to sections of what I say (particularly the last few sentences). How am I bypassing Scripture? I brought up the passage you quoted in Romans 14 today at 1:28pm U.S. Central time. Actually I had been studying it on August 11th.

 

 

I'm not a reader of long posts. And I do pick and choose what I want to respond too. That's not likely to change any time soon. I usually pick one thing that stands out to me and that's what I respond too.

 

 

Bypassing scripture. Let's have a look.

 

 

 

 

 

 

However, nursing mothers can have a different belief. In many instances according the the law in the U.S. in many instances she is exempt from doing so.

 

 

 

Explain that different belief. Are nursing mothers exempt from having to follow the scriptures? I'm just curious. 

 

And what do U.S. laws have to do with anything? It sounds like your saying, if U.S. law allows it, it automatically becomes biblical. I know that's not what you're saying, but it sure looks like it. The laws of this world do not replace the scriptures. I don't care how decent and compassionate they appear.

 

 

 

 

Moving on to the rest of your post.    :shower:

Posted

I said specifically that I'm not advocating ignoring weaker brothers and sisters in Christ. I do believe that we should consider those who struggle in the faith. Loving God and loving people is to be our guide. How that looks to each person in their culture, etc. can be different. :thumbsup:

I also am asking for compassion to be shown to nursing women.

I said I'm trying to find a balance. :thumbsup:

 

 

Regardless of culture and whatever else is out there, the Gospel never changes. 

 

 

 

You want find balance? Stick with the scriptures.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Moving on to the rest of your post.    :sneaking:


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  62
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  1,113
  • Content Per Day:  0.23
  • Reputation:   443
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  06/06/2012
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  10/17/1975

Posted

 

 

 

Grace is the Word

 

 

 

From the Word.

 

 

1 Corinthians 8

But beware lest somehow this liberty of yours become a stumbling block to those who are weak.

 

<snip>

 

13 Therefore, if food makes my brother stumble, I will never again eat meat, lest I make my brother stumble.

 

 

Romans 14

13 Therefore let us not judge one another anymore, but rather resolve this, not to put a stumbling block or a cause to fall in our brother’s way.

 

 

and without grace those verses become a nice club to force other to do what you would have them do. 

 

Colossians 4:6 

Let your speech always be gracious, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how you ought to answer each person.

 

Ephesians 4:32

Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.

 

I Corinthians 13:2

And if I have prophetic powers, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing.

 

I wanted to say I am sorry for any offense. I guess if I would have just come out and spelled out my thoughts, completely in one post, it would have saved a lot of  problems.           

 

 Breastfeeding under most circumstances is fine and I see no problem with it. Because most use modesty in doing so, trying not to reveal themselves. But I have also seen women who didn't care who saw what or who it offended, all the while proclaiming to be Christian. It's the later that I was addressing. Of course all women should be shown respect, grace and love at all times. But no believer should use their freedom to cause another to stumble. Most of the time, this is not the case. But it does happen, I have seen it.

 

 

Have you ever seen breastfeeding sit-in protests? That is a great example of what I meant about for show. There are 2 sides to this issue. I truly thought you and others were saying that because a woman breastfeeds, she can do anything she wants, because the bible says we have to show her love. If she causes someone to stumble, then to bad, oh well, it's there problem. She has no responsibility to show compassion or love. No responsibility to think of anyone but herself and baby. The fact she chooses to exercise no or little modesty is irrelevant. She can do what she wants because she is breastfeeding. To use something you said in the quote above, I thought you were using the word to control everyone who may be offended by it. or to quote you word for word, " without grace those verses become a nice club to force other to do what you would have them do."

 

 

 I thought you were doing exactly what you thought I was doing. I now realize you were only responding to my perceived lack of love or compassion to any and all breastfeeding women. That was not my intent. I am sorry for any offense. I will make an true effort to be more clear in the future and try to explain myself fully. Remembering to try to see things from the other point of view.

 

If you have any other questions, please ask. I will try to give a full answer.

 

 

God Bless You

Firestormx

Joseph

Posted

 

This second quote is not a personal attack. I am not mad at all. I will ask again directly. I will put the question at the end since this is typically what you respond to. Are you saying the Bible (based on the passages you quoted) is crystal clear that a woman should always cover herself when nursing in every circumstance and every culture?

 

 

 

If I was to say that I'd be lying. 

 

The passages I posted makes reference to those who are weaker in faith, easily tempted, etc. 

 

If I'm doing something that causes another to falter in their walk, I need to stop doing whatever it is I'm doing. I don't get special privileges because I'm uncomfortable. 

 

 

 

 

 

Done.   :hurrah:

Guest ninhao
Posted
.....The passages I posted makes reference to those who are weaker in faith, easily tempted, etc. 

 

If I'm doing something that causes another to falter in their walk, I need to stop doing whatever it is I'm doing. I don't get special privileges because I'm uncomfortable. 

 

 

Done.   :hurrah:

 

Hello Man,

 

I am curious about the application of Roman's 14 in this issue. Do you think there are circumstances when something which may cause a brother/sister to stumble is not the resposnsibilty of the "doer" to change.

 

For isntance; if I am stumbled by the shape of a woman is it her responsibilty to conceal her shape to the point of removing the temptation ? At this satage I have considered we should take reasonable steps not to stumble a person but do you suggest we should do anything requested ?

 

Done + 1 ? :D

Guest Butero
Posted

This week was breastfeeding week. Feel free to discuss one or more of these questions... :)

A. What do you think about breastfeeding? Cover or no cover?

B. What are the social norms in the culture/country you live in?

 

C. Do you know the laws in your country/state regarding breastfeeding?

 

A.  Some people freak out when they see a woman breastfeeding her child in public, so it is probably a good idea to cover herself as much as possible for their sake?  I don't care one way or the other.

 

B.  I rarely see a woman breastfeeding a child in public, and when they have, they were as modest as possible.

 

C.  I am not sure about the laws in my state, but I can't imagine any woman being arrested for breastfeeding in public?  I can just imagine the outrage and protests that would arise if that ever did occur!

Posted

 

.....The passages I posted makes reference to those who are weaker in faith, easily tempted, etc. 

 

If I'm doing something that causes another to falter in their walk, I need to stop doing whatever it is I'm doing. I don't get special privileges because I'm uncomfortable. 

 

 

Done.   :hurrah:

 

Hello Man,

 

I am curious about the application of Roman's 14 in this issue. Do you think there are circumstances when something which may cause a brother/sister to stumble is not the resposnsibilty of the "doer" to change.

 

For isntance; if I am stumbled by the shape of a woman is it her responsibilty to conceal her shape to the point of removing the temptation ? At this satage I have considered we should take reasonable steps not to stumble a person but do you suggest we should do anything requested ?

 

Done + 1 ? :D

 

 

 

 

I believe Romans is referencing passing judgment on weaker brothers and sisters for their convictions. 

 

 

13 Therefore let us not judge one another anymore, but rather resolve this, not to put a stumbling block or a cause to fall in our brother’s way.

 

 

People stumble for various reasons and there are times when there's nothing to be done about it. I know people who are jealous because someone has a better job then they do. Is that person expected to quit their job? No. 

 

Should I sell my house because my neighbor thinks it's too big?  No.

 

 

There are some things we cannot control, but for the ones we can, we should, or at least make an attempt.

Guest Butero
Posted

 

 

.....The passages I posted makes reference to those who are weaker in faith, easily tempted, etc. 

 

If I'm doing something that causes another to falter in their walk, I need to stop doing whatever it is I'm doing. I don't get special privileges because I'm uncomfortable. 

 

 

Done.   :hurrah:

 

Hello Man,

 

I am curious about the application of Roman's 14 in this issue. Do you think there are circumstances when something which may cause a brother/sister to stumble is not the resposnsibilty of the "doer" to change.

 

For isntance; if I am stumbled by the shape of a woman is it her responsibilty to conceal her shape to the point of removing the temptation ? At this satage I have considered we should take reasonable steps not to stumble a person but do you suggest we should do anything requested ?

 

Done + 1 ? :D

 

 

 

 

I believe Romans is referencing passing judgment on weaker brothers and sisters for their convictions. 

 

 

13 Therefore let us not judge one another anymore, but rather resolve this, not to put a stumbling block or a cause to fall in our brother’s way.

 

 

People stumble for various reasons and there are times when there's nothing to be done about it. I know people who are jealous because someone has a better job then they do. Is that person expected to quit their job? No. 

 

Should I sell my house because my neighbor thinks it's too big?  No.

 

 

There are some things we cannot control, but for the ones we can, we should, or at least make an attempt.

 

I agree with you.  Everyone likes to point to Romans to show we shouldn't judge, but few will acknowledge that people aren't supposed to offend others by the things we allow.  It is a two way street.  There is no question that there are some who are offended by a woman who breastfeeds her baby in public, and for that reason, your position is a valid one.  Personally, I don't understand why people are so bothered by it, but many are.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.72
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.72
  • Reputation:   2,259
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted

 

 

 

For that matter, when I mentioned to my husband about guys here claiming men are tempted with lust at seeing a woman breastfeeding without a cover, he gave a look of disgust and said something to the affect of, "Those guys [the ones lusting] have a problem."

So when someone admits that this is a stumbling block for them, the correct response is, the problem is theirs, not mine?

No one said anything about how to respond to someone.

 

I posted a verse from Corinthians. I'll post it again if you want.

 

We were referring to the anonymous men who were being referred to.

So because the ones that are stumbling are strangers, it's ok to stray from the Word?

 

Someone expressing their opinion on a matter to someone else is not stating what they would say to a person directly. I do not know of a single person who doesn't do that.

 

If I was talking face-to-face with a man who told me he feels lust seeing a woman breast-feeding when her breast is exposed . . . well, I'd probably feel too self-conscious and scared to say anything and try to leave as fast as I could. But if I did have the boldness to say anything ... actually, I can't feel myself having the boldness to say anything. Sorry.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...