Jump to content
IGNORED

Split: Your Views... Women Wearing Pants


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  764
  • Topics Per Day:  0.17
  • Content Count:  7,626
  • Content Per Day:  1.65
  • Reputation:   1,559
  • Days Won:  44
  • Joined:  10/03/2012
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

 

Right because as Christians we are to be known for our high standards. That's a command Jesus gave right?

We certainly don't want a reputation of ignoring God's Word and being in open rebellion.  I don't want any part of a church that does that. 

 

 

Who said anything about ignoring God's Word. Speaking of which...

 

John 13:31-35

The New Commandment

31 So, when he had gone out, Jesus said, “Now the Son of Man is glorified, and God is glorified in Him. 32 If God is glorified in Him, God will also glorify Him in Himself, and glorify Him immediately. 33 Little children, I shall be with you a little while longer. You will seek Me; and as I said to the Jews, ‘Where I am going, you cannot come,’ so now I say to you. 34 A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another; as I have loved you, that you also love one another. 35 By this all will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another.”

 

1. How is it loving to tell a woman she is sinning by wearing pants? Particularly when I would imagine at least 95% of people on WB don't hold the same personal conviction as you on this matter brother?

 

 

 

My question is this. Then I will try to let it go.

 

I am a women who wears pants. I am also a Christian. By telling you that I wear pants, would you then accuse me of not being a Christian? If you see a women at the store or on the street wearing paints. Do you look at her and say "no she is not a Christian women because she is in pants"?

 

Just trying to get a feel for how someone other then myself  thinks is all.

No.  I don't automatically jump to that conclusion, however I do know of some people that would.  I just look at it like we all are at different places in our walk, and we haven't all come to the same beliefs.  Jesus is the final judge of who is saved and who is lost.

 

 

2. Are you saying Butero that a woman who is MORE spiritual will come to understand that wearing pants are a sin?

 

Gal. 5:22-26

22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23 gentleness, self-control. Against such there is no law. 24 And those who are Christ’s have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires. 25 If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit. 26 Let us not become conceited, provoking one another, envying one another.

 

3. Where does this passage above, which clearly exemplifies the fruit of the Holy Spirit, say that we as Believers indwelt by the Holy Spirit will be known by our standards?

 

God bless,

GE

Guest Butero
Posted

 

 

Right because as Christians we are to be known for our high standards. That's a command Jesus gave right?

We certainly don't want a reputation of ignoring God's Word and being in open rebellion.  I don't want any part of a church that does that. 

 

 

Who said anything about ignoring God's Word. Speaking of which...

 

John 13:31-35

The New Commandment

31 So, when he had gone out, Jesus said, “Now the Son of Man is glorified, and God is glorified in Him. 32 If God is glorified in Him, God will also glorify Him in Himself, and glorify Him immediately. 33 Little children, I shall be with you a little while longer. You will seek Me; and as I said to the Jews, ‘Where I am going, you cannot come,’ so now I say to you. 34 A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another; as I have loved you, that you also love one another. 35 By this all will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another.”

 

1. How is it loving to tell a woman she is sinning by wearing pants? Particularly when I would imagine at least 95% of people on WB don't hold the same personal conviction as you on this matter brother?

 

 

 

My question is this. Then I will try to let it go.

 

I am a women who wears pants. I am also a Christian. By telling you that I wear pants, would you then accuse me of not being a Christian? If you see a women at the store or on the street wearing paints. Do you look at her and say "no she is not a Christian women because she is in pants"?

 

Just trying to get a feel for how someone other then myself  thinks is all.

No.  I don't automatically jump to that conclusion, however I do know of some people that would.  I just look at it like we all are at different places in our walk, and we haven't all come to the same beliefs.  Jesus is the final judge of who is saved and who is lost.

 

 

2. Are you saying Butero that a woman who is MORE spiritual will come to understand that wearing pants are a sin?

 

Gal. 5:22-26

22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23 gentleness, self-control. Against such there is no law. 24 And those who are Christ’s have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires. 25 If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit. 26 Let us not become conceited, provoking one another, envying one another.

 

3. Where does this passage above, which clearly exemplifies the fruit of the Holy Spirit, say that we as Believers indwelt by the Holy Spirit will be known by our standards?

 

God bless,

GE

 

How is it loving to not tell someone if they are doing something that might jeopardize their soul?  The OT false prophets were said to have healed the hurt of God's people a little by giving them soothing words, or in other words, failing to warn them of their sins and the judgment to come.  God's prophets were often out numbered 400 to 1 or worse.  The 95 percent can be wrong. 

 

I believe that if we are open to accept anything God has for us, he will reveal what is right and wrong.  If a person is closed off because they don't want to stop doing something they love, he can't get through?  That could just as easily apply to a person that loves to watch movies or sports, so I am not limiting this to one thing. 

 

God expects us to obey him.  The Bible says that obedience is better than sacrifice, and rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft.  The itching ear teachers will have a following.  Who doesn't want to be told that they are doing everything right?  The broad road is the road everyone will love to travel in this life, but in the end, it leads to destruction. 


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  764
  • Topics Per Day:  0.17
  • Content Count:  7,626
  • Content Per Day:  1.65
  • Reputation:   1,559
  • Days Won:  44
  • Joined:  10/03/2012
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

 

Interesting I was talking to a friend from Europe and Capri pants (normally something for women) are in style for men to wear in the summers. Are they sinning too Butero by wearing that which was originally intended for a woman?

If it can be shown that Capri pants pertain to a woman, yes they are, but I reject the notion that pants ever pertain to a woman, capris or otherwise. 

 

Originated on Capri Island... Created by Sonja de Lennart

 

 

 

The good thing about an island, of course, is that there are limits to growth. Capri covers only about four square miles, and inhabitable land is limited by the sharp volcanic mountain ridge that runs across the island, its peak separating the eastern and western lobes. There's a village on each side of the peak - Capri proper on the east, and higher Anacapri on the west.

 

The island has long been synonymous with fashion: Think Capri pants (designed in 1948 by Sonja de Lennart), handmade sandals, and jewelry fashioned from the orange-red Mediterranean coral. Florentine designer Emilio Pucci, who launched a haute couture salon on Capri in 1957, credited the island and its myriad of colors and patterns as inspiration for his designs.

Full article: http://www.boston.com/travel/getaways/europe/articles/2008/06/29/ancient_capri_still_casts_its_powerful_spell/?page=full

 

 

They were first only worn by women... Created by Sonja de Lennar...

 

 

 

The European fashion designer Sonja de Lennart invented the famous Capri pants in 1948. Well known as Capris, long or three-quarter shorts, they end below the knee and calf. The pants name comes from the Italian isle of Capri, where they rose to popularity in the late 1950s and early 1960s. First only worn by women, they later became popular also with men in many countries, especially in Europe and Latin America. The American actress Grace Kelly was the first movie star who wore Capris.

Full article: http://www.speak-fashion.de/fashion_history/classics/fashion-history-classcis-capri-pants

There are other sources that show that this style of pants was originally created for and worn by women.

God bless,

GE

Guest Butero
Posted

 

 

Interesting I was talking to a friend from Europe and Capri pants (normally something for women) are in style for men to wear in the summers. Are they sinning too Butero by wearing that which was originally intended for a woman?

If it can be shown that Capri pants pertain to a woman, yes they are, but I reject the notion that pants ever pertain to a woman, capris or otherwise. 

 

Originated on Capri Island... Created by Sonja de Lennart

 

 

 

The good thing about an island, of course, is that there are limits to growth. Capri covers only about four square miles, and inhabitable land is limited by the sharp volcanic mountain ridge that runs across the island, its peak separating the eastern and western lobes. There's a village on each side of the peak - Capri proper on the east, and higher Anacapri on the west.

 

The island has long been synonymous with fashion: Think Capri pants (designed in 1948 by Sonja de Lennart), handmade sandals, and jewelry fashioned from the orange-red Mediterranean coral. Florentine designer Emilio Pucci, who launched a haute couture salon on Capri in 1957, credited the island and its myriad of colors and patterns as inspiration for his designs.

Full article: http://www.boston.com/travel/getaways/europe/articles/2008/06/29/ancient_capri_still_casts_its_powerful_spell/?page=full

 

 

They were first only worn by women... Created by Sonja de Lennar...

 

 

 

The European fashion designer Sonja de Lennart invented the famous Capri pants in 1948. Well known as Capris, long or three-quarter shorts, they end below the knee and calf. The pants name comes from the Italian isle of Capri, where they rose to popularity in the late 1950s and early 1960s. First only worn by women, they later became popular also with men in many countries, especially in Europe and Latin America. The American actress Grace Kelly was the first movie star who wore Capris.

Full article: http://www.speak-fashion.de/fashion_history/classics/fashion-history-classcis-capri-pants

There are other sources that show that this style of pants was originally created for and worn by women.

God bless,

GE

 

Then I would put it in the camp with other pants made and sold to women.  They are unclean garments, similar to the unclean Babylonian garments spoken of in the OT.  They are neither clean for men or women.  That is my opinion.  Take it or leave it.  At this point, I don't care. 

 

I just thought of something that is kind of funny to me.  Sometime back, Nebula commented that when she started seeing men wear capris, she would reconsider her position that it was ok for women to wear pants.  This stood out to me because it was about a month later that I actually saw a man wearing capris while traveling through Indiana.  It doesn't mean anything, but I was able to find humor in this exercize in futility. 


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  764
  • Topics Per Day:  0.17
  • Content Count:  7,626
  • Content Per Day:  1.65
  • Reputation:   1,559
  • Days Won:  44
  • Joined:  10/03/2012
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

How is it loving to not tell someone if they are doing something that might jeopardize their soul?  The OT false prophets were said to have healed the hurt of God's people a little by giving them soothing words, or in other words, failing to warn them of their sins and the judgment to come.  God's prophets were often out numbered 400 to 1 or worse.  The 95 percent can be wrong. 

 

 

I believe that if we are open to accept anything God has for us, he will reveal what is right and wrong.  If a person is closed off because they don't want to stop doing something they love, he can't get through?  That could just as easily apply to a person that loves to watch movies or sports, so I am not limiting this to one thing. 

 

God expects us to obey him.  The Bible says that obedience is better than sacrifice, and rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft.  The itching ear teachers will have a following.  Who doesn't want to be told that they are doing everything right?  The broad road is the road everyone will love to travel in this life, but in the end, it leads to destruction. 

 

So you ARE saying that if a Christian woman wears pants it could jeopardize her soul? This is a bit confusing in bold.

 

The difference in this discussion is the OT false prophets and the OT phrophets of God is not the same circumstances we're describing.  In that case there were heathens (OT False Prophets) and those who followed God (OT prophets of God). So this comparison is a stretch at best and faulty at worst.

The position you (you are a Christian indwelt by the Holy Spirit) have taken (pants should not be worn by a woman as this is sin) and other CHRISTIANS (who are ALSO indwelt by the Holy Spirit) position on this issue is that both sides have the Holy Spirit indwelling them.

You are not in the minority standing up for truth. You are in the minority standing up for your personal conviction. (Which is fine by the way, just not portraying your personal conviction as universal Biblical truth... ) Surely you can see the difference?

In any case yes as Christ-followers we are to be obedient to God. Sure. Yet we're commanded to love God and love people. Jesus specifically commanded us to love one another. THAT is how we're to be known - the evidence is the fruit of the Spirit in our lives. Not by our standards. After all standards change across cultures and times. But God's Word stays the same. Surely we can agree on this?

God bless,

GE


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  764
  • Topics Per Day:  0.17
  • Content Count:  7,626
  • Content Per Day:  1.65
  • Reputation:   1,559
  • Days Won:  44
  • Joined:  10/03/2012
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

 

Then I would put it in the camp with other pants made and sold to women.  They are unclean garments, similar to the unclean Babylonian garments spoken of in the OT.  They are neither clean for men or women.  That is my opinion.  Take it or leave it.  At this point, I don't care. 

 

 

Capris were made by a woman and sold to women for at least 2-3 decades before they were sold to men. But okay brother. Capris are unclean Babylonian garments...So men or women shouldn't capris. And women for sure shouldn't wear pants. Gotcha. ;)

 

 

 

 

 I already stated that I have heard every possible argument for women wearing pants, so nobody is coming back with anything that will remotely change my mind.

 

 

Clearly.

Guest Butero
Posted

 

How is it loving to not tell someone if they are doing something that might jeopardize their soul?  The OT false prophets were said to have healed the hurt of God's people a little by giving them soothing words, or in other words, failing to warn them of their sins and the judgment to come.  God's prophets were often out numbered 400 to 1 or worse.  The 95 percent can be wrong. 

 

 

I believe that if we are open to accept anything God has for us, he will reveal what is right and wrong.  If a person is closed off because they don't want to stop doing something they love, he can't get through?  That could just as easily apply to a person that loves to watch movies or sports, so I am not limiting this to one thing. 

 

God expects us to obey him.  The Bible says that obedience is better than sacrifice, and rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft.  The itching ear teachers will have a following.  Who doesn't want to be told that they are doing everything right?  The broad road is the road everyone will love to travel in this life, but in the end, it leads to destruction. 

 

So you ARE saying that if a Christian woman wears pants it could jeopardize her soul? This is a bit confusing in bold.

 

The difference in this discussion is the OT false prophets and the OT phrophets of God is not the same circumstances we're describing.  In that case there were heathens (OT False Prophets) and those who followed God (OT prophets of God). So this comparison is a stretch at best and faulty at worst.

The position you (you are a Christian indwelt by the Holy Spirit) have taken (pants should not be worn by a woman as this is sin) and other CHRISTIANS (who are ALSO indwelt by the Holy Spirit) position on this issue is that both sides have the Holy Spirit indwelling them.

You are not in the minority standing up for truth. You are in the minority standing up for your personal conviction. (Which is fine by the way, just not portraying your personal conviction as universal Biblical truth... ) Surely you can see the difference?

In any case yes as Christ-followers we are to be obedient to God. Sure. Yet we're commanded to love God and love people. Jesus specifically commanded us to love one another. THAT is how we're to be known - the evidence is the fruit of the Spirit in our lives. Not by our standards. After all standards change across cultures and times. But God's Word stays the same. Surely we can agree on this?

God bless,

GE

 

I do not agree with you.  I reject the notion this is a person conviction.  It is an application of scripture with regard to modern life.  I am taking a scripture, and showing where people are guilty of sin today.  Sin will jeopardize a person's soul, so if I am ultimately proven to be right, and it is an abomination for women to wear pants, it does put those women in danger.  Pastor Chambers has stated he believes women that wear pants won't go in the rapture.  As I stated earlier, I am not the final judge, so I don't determine who is saved and who is lost.  For that reason, I simply share my knowledge and others have to decide for themselves if what I said has any merit?  We are told to work out our own salvation with fear and trembling.  I believe I am in the minority standing up for the truth, and you are going to have to answer one day for soothing the hurt of God's people a little.  I am not saying that to offend you or to attack you.  You seem to want to know how I view it, so I am being straight with you. 

Guest Butero
Posted

 

 

Then I would put it in the camp with other pants made and sold to women.  They are unclean garments, similar to the unclean Babylonian garments spoken of in the OT.  They are neither clean for men or women.  That is my opinion.  Take it or leave it.  At this point, I don't care. 

 

 

Capris were made by a woman and sold to women for at least 2-3 decades before they were sold to men. But okay brother. Capris are unclean Babylonian garments...So men or women shouldn't capris. And women for sure shouldn't wear pants. Gotcha. ;)

 

 

 

 

 I already stated that I have heard every possible argument for women wearing pants, so nobody is coming back with anything that will remotely change my mind.

 

 

Clearly.

 

Good.  I am glad we got that straightened out?  BTW, as I said earlier, if you think you have some new insight I haven't heard, and you want to debate this in the Soap Box, I am more than willing.  That is entirely up to you? 


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  764
  • Topics Per Day:  0.17
  • Content Count:  7,626
  • Content Per Day:  1.65
  • Reputation:   1,559
  • Days Won:  44
  • Joined:  10/03/2012
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

 

In any case yes as Christ-followers we are to be obedient to God. Sure. Yet we're commanded to love God and love people. Jesus specifically commanded us to love one another. THAT is how we're to be known - the evidence is the fruit of the Spirit in our lives. Not by our standards. After all standards change across cultures and times. But God's Word stays the same. Surely we can agree on this?

God bless,

GE

 

 

I do not agree with you.  I reject the notion this is a person conviction.  It is an application of scripture with regard to modern life.  I am taking a scripture, and showing where people are guilty of sin today.  Sin will jeopardize a person's soul, so if I am ultimately proven to be right, and it is an abomination for women to wear pants, it does put those women in danger.  Pastor Chambers has stated he believes women that wear pants won't go in the rapture.  As I stated earlier, I am not the final judge, so I don't determine who is saved and who is lost.  For that reason, I simply share my knowledge and others have to decide for themselves if what I said has any merit?  We are told to work out our own salvation with fear and trembling.  I believe I am in the minority standing up for the truth, and you are going to have to answer one day for soothing the hurt of God's people a little.  I am not saying that to offend you or to attack you.  You seem to want to know how I view it, so I am being straight with you. 

 

I appreciate your honesty. :thumbsup:

I suppose once again we'll have to agree to disagree on this subject. I see nothing in Scripture that points to women wearing pants a sin. I find your application of this verse faulty. But I digress. We will not agree on this subject.

However, can we agree on what I said in highlighted in red?

God bless,

GE

Guest Butero
Posted

 

 

In any case yes as Christ-followers we are to be obedient to God. Sure. Yet we're commanded to love God and love people. Jesus specifically commanded us to love one another. THAT is how we're to be known - the evidence is the fruit of the Spirit in our lives. Not by our standards. After all standards change across cultures and times. But God's Word stays the same. Surely we can agree on this?

God bless,

GE

 

 

I do not agree with you.  I reject the notion this is a person conviction.  It is an application of scripture with regard to modern life.  I am taking a scripture, and showing where people are guilty of sin today.  Sin will jeopardize a person's soul, so if I am ultimately proven to be right, and it is an abomination for women to wear pants, it does put those women in danger.  Pastor Chambers has stated he believes women that wear pants won't go in the rapture.  As I stated earlier, I am not the final judge, so I don't determine who is saved and who is lost.  For that reason, I simply share my knowledge and others have to decide for themselves if what I said has any merit?  We are told to work out our own salvation with fear and trembling.  I believe I am in the minority standing up for the truth, and you are going to have to answer one day for soothing the hurt of God's people a little.  I am not saying that to offend you or to attack you.  You seem to want to know how I view it, so I am being straight with you. 

 

I appreciate your honesty. :thumbsup:

I suppose once again we'll have to agree to disagree on this subject.

However, can we agree on what I said in highlighted in red?

God bless,

GE

 

I agree that we are to love one another.  The reason I am hesitant to take this further is because people look at love different.  There are unbelievers that love others, do great works of charity, etc.  One of the nicest women I know is an atheist.  Love is something we should be known for. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...