More evidence of Noah's Flood?

[LookingForAnswers]

stinks when someone treats you with no respect and talks down to you now doesn't it.  

[a-seeker]

 

 

 

 

 

========================================================================

 

 

I have no idea where you get Nimrod as originator of the false gods—we have one verse in the Bible that has to do with Nimrod, and a lot of non-Biblical tradition.  And I am too tired to follow these rabbit trails. If it is really important then just say what I am supposed to figure out.  But my guess is, it is more conspiracy theories.

 

Well you know what they say....."Ya get what Ya Get then".  It's not an equation it's called research. I've already told you where to start, if you wanna close your eyes to it.....fine with me.  And I could care less what label you put on it.

 

 

I see no point to this.  I wish I had not mentioned Constantine—it has triggered some other association which has nothing to do with the topic

 

R-U Kiddin me?   Well there Connor......YOU'RE WHOLE POINT WAS BASED ON THE "CHURCH" and what the "Church" did in association with the ridiculous model.  See the Relevancy 

 

 

I try not to do word searches in English or anything other than the original: there is too much room for interpretation as it is….but to indulge you, I did, and no, nothing jumps out at me remotely relevant to this topic.

 

 

Well you know what they say:  You can lead a horse to water, but.....

 

 

You said the “they” were misreading it, implying that had they read closely, they would see the Bible does not teach geocentricism—you placed the fault on “them”, I am merely defending “them”.

 

Yes, I was referring to "Christian Scientists" term that Sheniy said.  I should have stopped her and asked her to clarify but I was Lazy and didn't.  And Boy am I paying the price for it over many posts LOL.

 

So if "they" (Sheniy's Christian Scientists) whoever they are LOL, would have read it closely.....I'm saying that that wouldn't have reached a conclusion on either A or B.

 

Who are you defending?   LOL

 

 

There is no way because I don’t know what Tensor Calculus is.

 

Laughing Out Loud Connor.  Touche.   It was just an analogy like putting the wrong emPHAsis on the wrong syLLAble.

 

 

A lot of things seem to come to mind for you.

 

Yes, it's quite an adventure in there IMHO LOL

 

 

Your exegesis is based on association.  AND this.......(see below Enoch’s exegesis).

 

 

So you're attacking my somewhat "Primitive" and rather "Pedestrian" in your eyes, Exegesis Skills??  Pot meet Kettle.

 

Have you heard of this.....(Matthew 7:5) " Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye."

 

Lets here from an Expert on the Subject in Reference to "Your" EXEGESIS SKILLS:  From Shiloh 357.....

 

"This is why your “exegesis” should not be taken seriously.   There is nothing choppy or inconsistent at all.   God is not bound by some set of rules an arrogant little man says He has to follow in order to be “consistent” in anyone’s eyes.  God is not limited to the logical box you seek to put Him in.   My assessment of your poor exegetical skills is more than warranted."

 

"intelligent exegesis and not the hermeneutic trainwreck you are subscribing to".

 

"I have seen your "exegesis" first hand and frankly, it's not really exegesis at all."

 

"You don't have a very firm grasp on how the Bible is functioning.  You may grasp how some scholars approach the text, but you don't know much at all about how the Bible is functioning."

 

My friend, Shiloh is not an expert.  Far from it. He has an M.A. in theology.  I know you respect him, but that is because in general he validates your position (YEC) and "speaks with authority" which really means he speaks dogmatically. I am not saying he is not intelligent, he is a sharp guy, but he speaks with more authority than he actually possesses and that because he feels so much is on the line: once he let's go of his presuppositions I believe he will do wonders.  But until then, I ask you to show me anywhere above or any place where he refutes me, where he demonstrates that I am wrong, not merely saying that I am wrong?  I recommended before you take a stroll over to the Genesis 1 thread....have you?

 

clb

Edited March 21, 2014 by ConnorLiamBrown

[a-seeker]

 

 

 

 

=================================================================================

 

 

Some believe that's not true.  There is biblical support for prophecy in churches, not major scriptural ones like what we see in the bible.  I'm assuming you disagree.  That's fine.  It's a discussion for another day, and I don't want to rabbit trail this further.

 

 

 

 

(Revelation 22:18) "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:"

 

Yes...but this one Stops that notion right in it's tracks, IMHO.  But yes, another day.

 

 

 

 

You know that verse has to do with adding things to that book right?  Look, you don't respect my exegesis (and that because Shiloh doesn't) and that is fine.  But do you run these things by Shiloh at least?  Stick to science.

 

clb

[enoob57]

You know that verse has to do with adding things to that book right?   

clb

You do realize your point is mute due to the last book written (content) is Revelation and it contains all

that will be in all eternity... thus the seal set forth there is the seal of God's Word in what was, is, and

will be! Love, Steven

[jerryR34]

 

....and please stop being so dramatic.

Haha, like all posting in all caps, large font and multi-colored font? Ever notice how scientists don't jump up and down and shout and cry an plead when speaking while preachers do?

[Enoch2021]

 

 

 

=======================================================

 

My friend, Shiloh is not an expert.  Far from it. He has an M.A. in theology.

 

He is an expert as evidenced by just a cursory review of any thread in this forum.  I don't care if he has an Associates Degree in Performing Arts, it's the SUBSTANCE of what he says. 

 

**Special Note** Initials after someones name does not validate anything.  In Fact personally, the more initials.... the higher my DEFCON HYPER ALERT!!  It's a logarithmic scale and is proportional to the totality of initials.

 

 

I know you respect him, but that is because in general he validates your position (YEC) and "speaks with authority" which really means he speaks dogmatically.

 

That's a Pure Conjecture aka (Guess). Do you have Special Mind Powers that I'm not aware of?  I respect him because of SUBSTANCE, he supports what he says. 

 

but he speaks with more authority than he actually possesses and that because he feels so much is on the line: once he let's go of his presuppositions I believe he will do wonders

 

Baseless Unsupported Conjecture

 

 

But until then, I ask you to show me anywhere above or any place where he refutes me,

 

Connor if I listed them all, I would Crash the Worthy Servers.  Just pull up any thread were He and you had an interaction and.... there ya go.

 

 

I recommended before you take a stroll over to the Genesis 1 thread....have you?

 

I took a stroll on over there and didn't see much if any difference than the same Genre.

[Enoch2021]

 

 

 

 

=================================================================================

 

You know that verse has to do with adding things to that book right?   But do you run these things by Shiloh at least?  Stick to science.

 

Yes well, that's what I've heard from many Expositors.

 

And then I just post this to settle matters....

 

(Deuteronomy 4:2) "Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you."

 

Moreover, this is just basic Common Sense and is intuitive since GOD puts HIS WORD even above HIS OWN NAME.  If anything else appears in the WORD that's not Sourced from HIM then it wouldn't be HIS WORD.

 

 

Look, you don't respect my exegesis (and that because Shiloh doesn't) and that is fine.

 

I don't respect your Exegesis in General but review each on a case by case basis..... and I don't need to consult Shiloh.  All I do is open the Book and read it...it's pretty clear.

 

 

But do you run these things by Shiloh at least?

 

If there is a case where I'm confused on a passage or a concept I will ask him.  Those cases are the exception rather than the rule because of the Inherent nature of the text in TOTO.

[Enoch2021]

 

 

 

=================================================================================

 

 

Haha, like all posting in all caps, large font and multi-colored font? Ever notice how scientists don't jump up and down and shout and cry an plead

 

Since when do: "all caps", "large font", "multi-colored font" denote Jumping up and down, crying and pleading?

 

Just because you Conjure then Randomly Self Assign Non-Sequitur meanings to inanimate objects doesn't make it True.    (Remember Grandpa's Cough Syrup?)

 

And,

 

It's a Strawman and Reification Fallacy in TOTO.

[LookingForAnswers]

And then I just post this to settle matters....

 

(Deuteronomy 4:2) "Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you."

 

Moreover, this is just basic Common Sense and is intuitive since GOD puts HIS WORD even above HIS OWN NAME.  If anything else appears in the WORD that's not Sourced from HIM then it wouldn't be HIS WORD.

 

.

 

 

Why did the interpreters of the AKJV add the word Easter?  This was clearly not God's word yet there it is in the AKJV.  Why do you support such blatant adding to God's word?

[jerryR34]

 

 

 

=================================================================================

 

 

Haha, like all posting in all caps, large font and multi-colored font? Ever notice how scientists don't jump up and down and shout and cry an plead

 

Since when do: "all caps", "large font", "multi-colored font" denote Jumping up and down, crying and pleading?

 

Just because you Conjure then Randomly Self Assign Non-Sequitur meanings to inanimate objects doesn't make it True.    (Remember Grandpa's Cough Syrup?)

 

And,

 

It's a Strawman and Reification Fallacy in TOTO.

What would a scientifically backed post lose if you posted it in one font with no emphasis or emoticons? If your words are not enough, then exaggerated font and emoticons won't help you.