Renowned Chemist: Evolutionists Do Not Understand the Origin of Life

[OldEnglishSheepdog]

 

 

I find the title of this thread ironic.   Where's Enoch when you need him crying "Plea to authority' fallacy?  

 

Hey Jerry, could I get an answer to my question please?

 

If speciation is necessary for both theories, how do you suppose that it's evidence of the one over and against the other?

 

If iis evidence for evolution, do you accept evolution?  Can you define species in the creation "science" view of things?

 

 

I didn't say it's evidence for evolution.

 

I implied that whether or not you're an evolutionist speciation is necessary, ergo it can't be evidence for evolution.

 

The best defintion of a species I've found is any animals that can breed and have fertile offspring.

 

So, if both evolutionists and creationists agree that animals speciated, how then can it be evidence for evolution over and against special creation?

[jerryR34]

I find the title of this thread ironic. Where's Enoch when you need him crying "Plea to authority' fallacy?

Hey Jerry, could I get an answer to my question please?

If speciation is necessary for both theories, how do you suppose that it's evidence of the one over and against the other?

If iis evidence for evolution, do you accept evolution? Can you define species in the creation "science" view of things?

Why don't you just answer question, Jerry???

[jerryR34]

I find the title of this thread ironic. Where's Enoch when you need him crying "Plea to authority' fallacy?

Hey Jerry, could I get an answer to my question please?

If speciation is necessary for both theories, how do you suppose that it's evidence of the one over and against the other?

If iis evidence for evolution, do you accept evolution? Can you define species in the creation "science" view of things?

Why don't you just answer question, Jerry???

[jerryR34]

As all animals were created and named by Adam, no speciation is necessary for creationism. As usual, creation "science" has a parasitic relationship with actual science. Name any science discipline that creation science has advanced. ..

[Guest Teditis]

 

 

 

Micro vs Macro evolution should never be confused as

being similar... one is obvious and the other absurd. And

one helps explain God while the other was invented to do

away with Him.

It doesn't follow that hundreds of changes across thousands of generations will pile together to equal thousands of changes across millions of generations?

 

 

Quite simply, No... on several counts.

Where are you getting your numbers from btw?

 

Then demonstrate it in a manner that isn't stupid and doesn't lie.

 

These ones? My butt. They're to illustrate a point not be exact.

 

Why would I want to do that if your demeanor is going to be derogatory?

And you want everyone else to be precise while you use vague and fallacious terms...?

I don't like to argue subjects... I prefer discussing them.

[Steve_S]

Locking to let this cool down.