The beast that goes into Perdition

[Serving]

8 minutes ago, thereselittleflower said:

It goes beyond that.

Serving's claiming that the 1611 English translation REPLACES the original Greek and Hebrew scriptures as DIVINELY inspired, that the Greek and Hebrew scriptures were only temporary. Basically that God rewrote scripture in English.

I don't know who teaches this stuff, but it's quite bizarre to me that anyone would claim such a thing.

 

Are you even listening?

GOD released HIS WRITTEN WORD where for the FIRST TIME IN HISTORY BOTH TESTAMENTS were released in ONE BOOK .. and released in ONE LANGUAGE that HE CHOSE, NOT ME, where ALL the words were CONFIRMED as to WHAT HE INTENDED THEM TO MEAN .. this was done in the ENGLISH language .. and people like you and your teacher ABHOR this fact because it TAKES AWAY all your imaginary POWER you lot TRY to exert over the disciples.

Christ said the gospels were for the SIMPLE .. that's ME alright, simple .. NOT for the learned who go to universities to learn Greek & Hebrew etc .. how presumptuous of the subtle class warfare your lot are waging where only those who speak other languages can understand .. totally OPPOSITE to what CHRIST SAID .. what a joke .. what pride.

 

[Serving]

Just now, thereselittleflower said:

 

 

ummm   Serving  -  I hate to see you like this.     I strongly recommend you step away from the computer and take a break.  

By the way, I'm not the one who claimed the covering Paul spoke of was a woman's hair.  

Okay you didn't bring it up, then I apologise for THAT .. BUT .. you DEFENDED it, which is WRONG.

Therese, I am standing up for myself and for the word I am speaking/defending which you said I was twisting.

If you want to start accusing, be prepared for a defense, or simply don't accuse others of things which are highly offensive to honest people, like the charge of me "twisting scriptures".

That to me is offensive because I am a HONEST person .. you are attacking MY integrity as a human being okay .. so when I said "you don't understand the word", that was not snide nor an attack on your character but an observation you are welcome to dispute, but your reply was dishonest and twisted the scriptures I used and misquoted my statements .. no, why should I put up with such dishonest tactics?

Heck, I even backed Morning Glory in a post AGAINST a friend I made here online because I felt she was right .. and she has put the boots into me many a time, but I stood for what I believed was RIGHT and not for my personal feelings .. is that the character of a deliberate word twister? NO.

I see your teachers explanations and it screams of Illuminati to me .. I'm sorry, but I have been studying them for over 20 years now, and you are being taught by one of their arms .. your explanations are a mix of perverted beliefs all rolled into one big contradiction .. hints at Gnosticism, smells of Catholic idol worship translated into metaphors, hints of Jesuit corruption, possile low level Masonic understandings, none of it is plain and straight forward but screams of the mystery school of thought in their interpretations, so no, I do not need to calm down, I am calm, just I'm tired of all the double standards if you want me to be honest .. where those upholding the word are called into question yet those openly and shamelessly twisting the scriptures, like YOUR TEACHERS are being defended .. it is wrong.   

You are part of a Cabbalistic (Satanic perversion) movement and you can't even see it .. but I can .. and maybe God will allow me to help you see it too because you SEEM like a nice person, but even nice people can be used for evil unawares.

[gdemoss]

1 hour ago, Serving said:

Is that what Therese was saying?

That when God said that a woman should cover her head when praying (as I discern it by your answers?) that "covering" merely means HAIR????

And what, are ANY others agreeing? God forbid.

Oh boy .. oh boy .. oh boy .. we might be dealing with freemasons here brother .. or Cabbalists (which is Satanism dressed up), or a cult group of Jesuit teachings, all these are part of their bigger brother's doings  .. the ILLUMINATI.

I am being serious too .. I have looked into what's going on in the attack on Christ's word .. ALL these groups are "IN" the churches and "church" groups and ESPECIALLY on Christian forums posing as disciples of Christ for to corrupt and DESTROY God's written word and their followers are what is officially termed as "useless idiots" (not MY descriptive for those ignorant ones who are being used) by the main leaders whose language consists of a word called "Goyim", which is what THEY see US as .. CATTLE to be slaughtered .. let us be alert to their word games and scripture twisting they so shamelessly practice, those using the Satanic Talmud which is OPPOSITE to true Judaism which has been hijacked by the Talmudists who are really CABBALISTS which is SATANIC and against Judaism of which it pretends to be and 99% of Israel thinks they follow God when in fact they follow the TALMUD which is NOT the OT but in OPPOSITION to the OT .. millions of Jews deceived by their so called "rabbis" who are Cabbalistic Satanists in disguise.

If you disagree with THERESE, then I am with you on this, what a shameless display of twisting the scriptures for personal bias.

For a woman to cover her head when praying means just that, put a covering over her long hair .. at least YOU and I are speaking ENGLISH here .. I'm positive many here are better at speaking Greek or Hebrew than they are at English, I mean, it is not even subtle, you cant really call what they are doing as simple mistakes, it is outright deception and word twisting at play here .. undoubtedly ulterior motives are at work.

 

No Serving.  That is the way it sounds to me.  I read it again and again, all I get is that God gave woman her hair for a covering so therefore she should wear it long and leave it down when praying or prophesying.  If I am missing something then I don't know what it is.

[thereselittleflower]

 

3 minutes ago, Serving said:

Okay you didn't bring it up, then I apologise for THAT .. BUT .. you DEFENDED it, which is WRONG.

 

No Serving,   I explained why it was wrong to understand that the covering Paul spoke of was a woman's hair.

You have been raging in your posts here tonight, going off the deep end with people.

This can't be good for you.   

Please walk away from the computer and rest and calm down.   

[Serving]

Just now, gdemoss said:

No Serving.  That is the way it sounds to me.  I read it again and again, all I get is that God gave woman her hair for a covering so therefore she should wear it long and leave it down when praying or prophesying.  If I am missing something then I don't know what it is.

Nope, you are RIGHT .. that is obviously what they are saying and it is WRONG.

Yes hair was given as a covering, but it is NOT the same APPLICATION when God says a woman should cover her head when praying .. IF it were just the HAIR, then why did God bother saying it at all since 99% of women already HAVE HAIR !!!!

It is circular reasoning, faulty thinking processes at play brother and nothing more.

What they seem to forget is that Paul said it was UP TO THE WOMAN if she WANTED to do that or NOT .. but they just can't help themselves and always play word games to justify themselves.

[thereselittleflower]

3 minutes ago, Serving said:

Nope, you are RIGHT .. that is obviously what they are saying and it is WRONG.

Yes hair was given as a covering, but it is NOT the same APPLICATION when God says a woman should cover her head when praying .. IF it were just the HAIR, then why did God bother saying it at all since 99% of women already HAVE HAIR !!!!

It is circular reasoning, faulty thinking processes at play brother and nothing more.

What they seem to forget is that Paul said it was UP TO THE WOMAN if she WANTED to do that or NOT .. but they just can't help themselves and always play word games to justify themselves.

you are attacking what gdemoss is claiming.

You are reading what is being said backwards.

Please take a break. Take time for yourself.    Pray.  I am going to do that now myself.

 

 

[n2thelight]

Therese

You said the man of sin could not be satan because he is called the MAN, in the below verse,is Gabriel a MAN or an Angel?

 

Daniel 9:21 "Yea, whiles I was speaking in prayer, even the man Gabriel, whom I had seen in the vision at the beginning, being caused to fly swiftly, touched me about the time of the evening oblation,"

[Serving]

41 minutes ago, thereselittleflower said:

 

 

There is NO perfect English translation.

 

 

So you believe the SCHOLARS and NOT GOD who declared HE WOULD PRESERVE HIS WORD.

That is all it comes down to because I have debated your types before .. admit it .. you do not believe that God was able to preserve His written word in ONE BOOK ..

You can NOT say He preserved His written word in multiple books (new age translations) because NONE OF THEM AGREE and they ALL CONTRADICT EACH OTHER  .. but God is NOT the AUTHOR of CONFUSION Therese ..

It is either God preserved His written word in ONE BOOK, where GOD brought both Testaments together for the FIRST TIME in history for ALL MEN to share .. or .. God did NOT preserve His written word at all and we NEED to look at hundreds of bibles which ALL contradict each other just to get a grip on the whole sorry affair .. OR better said, where lowly people like me NEED scholars to tell us what to believe (back to Catholic tactics where only THEIR "priests" can understand God and the rest of us are all brain dead) .. you can NOT have both Therese, it's ONE or the OTHER .. no person of credibility can refute that obvious truth.

(BTW, TWO Spiritualists started all these bible translations off .. one of them HATED most of CHRIST'S TEACHINGS, the other was a typical Catholic priest who LOVED séances and many other occultic practices .. where not only history, but even modern surveys PROVE over and over by THEIR OWN ADMISSIONS that most of them do not even Believe in the bible but are in it for the easy lifestyle & the job stability & the power they get out of it and all not forgetting the other perverted reasons which give them access to children they do NOT admit to) and look, all the majority of "Christians" blindly follow the PATH those two charlatans first laid out and follow without question still .. it is so sad.

Many of you need to wake up to the obvious.

[Serving]

20 minutes ago, thereselittleflower said:

you are attacking what gdemoss is claiming.

You are reading what is being said backwards.

Please take a break. Take time for yourself.    Pray.  I am going to do that now myself.

 

 

Huh?

But I asked him myself so how can that be?

If it is so, then I apologize to you, and I mean that .. BUT .. we still got axes to grind Therese,

I'll walk away now too.

 

[Serving]

35 minutes ago, thereselittleflower said:

you are attacking what gdemoss is claiming.

You are reading what is being said backwards.

Please take a break. Take time for yourself.    Pray.  I am going to do that now myself.

 

 

I just looked at what gdemoss said, he answered me honestly but I mistook him in the way he answered ..

I was wrong on THAT part .. I truly apologise and hope people see this that YOU did NOT say what I thought was being said ..

Lest I sully your reputation on THIS matter unjustly ..

Once again, I apologize on THAT subject .. but not on the other argument/debate we are having .. LOL.