Gun control is one thing, but what about bullets?

[The_Patriot21]

1 hour ago, Out of the Shadows said:

The right to carry a gun on federal park land, overriding a Reagan law saying they must be locked in a glove compartment or trunk prior to entering. And the right to have a gun in a checked bag on AmTrack, replacing an Bush II law that forbid it. 

Actually the Reagan law stated no guns period on federal parks, obamas law said you could as long as they were locked away. Probably the only pro gun law Obama signed in 8 years.

[Running Gator]

14 minutes ago, The_Patriot2016 said:

Actually the Reagan law stated no guns period on federal parks, obamas law said you could as long as they were locked away. Probably the only pro gun law Obama signed in 8 years.

Sorry, but you are just wrong...

Park visitors are able to openly carry legal handguns, rifles, shotguns and other firearms per a federal law approved by Congress and signed by President Barack Obama in February 2010. Concealed weapons are allowed by state statute.

http://www.yellowstonepark.com/guns-in-yellowstone/

And if you read the thread you will find it is one of two gun laws signed by President Obama.  Neither of which made gun laws more strict, so all the lies about Obama taking away your guns were just that..

Edited September 1, 2016 by Out of the Shadows

[Running Gator]

5 minutes ago, Davida said:

 

It's like a WH press briefing...

Feel free to list all the laws signed by President Obama taking away your gun rights.  I am terribly sorry if reality does not match your right wing view of things, but the FACT of the matter is that guns laws are less strict now than they were 8 years ago.   I know this is not what you have been fed by the GOP and the like of Rush Limbaugh, but the truth is the truth. 

[The_Patriot21]

6 minutes ago, Out of the Shadows said:

Sorry, but you are just wrong...

Park visitors are able to openly carry legal handguns, rifles, shotguns and other firearms per a federal law approved by Congress and signed by President Barack Obama in February 2010. Concealed weapons are allowed by state statute.

http://www.yellowstonepark.com/guns-in-yellowstone/

And if you read the thread you will find it is one of two gun laws signed by President Obama.  Neither of which made gun laws more strict, so all the lies about Obama taking away your guns were just that..

Even if I was wrong about the wording, if you think obamas only made 2 laws concerning guns, then I would urge you to take a look at all the executive actions he has taken over the years.

[Running Gator]

5 minutes ago, The_Patriot2016 said:

Even if I was wrong about the wording, if you think obamas only made 2 laws concerning guns, then I would urge you to take a look at all the executive actions he has taken over the years.

You were not wrong about the wording, you were wrong about the very nature of the law.  An Executive Action basically meaningless, it is a proposal that carries no legal weight at all.   But hey, if I am wrong tell me which of his EA's has infringed upon your right, or mine, to own a gun?   I personally own guns for 3 purposes, investment value, sport shooting and sentimental values. Buying a gun for any of those reasons has not gotten one iota harder with Obama in office.  I will say it again..nobody is coming for your guns, that is a lie you have been fed, nothing more.

[The_Patriot21]

You say it makes no bearing, but I can list dozens, if not 100s, of ffl dealers who would disagree with you, because quite frankly, they did make a difference. It made guns harder to sell. It made if harder just to keep an ffl. You can call them meaningless all you want, fact of the matter they're only meaningless to those who dont buy and sell guns, to anyone who actually does-especially those that actively sell the guns (legally I might add) they have indeed had an impact on the gun market.

 

And let's not forget all the laws he has attempted to pass and failed, because they were such junk laws even he couldn't pull them off. Kind of like this ammunition law.

[Running Gator]

2 minutes ago, The_Patriot2016 said:

You say it makes no bearing, but I can list dozens, if not 100s, of ffl dealers who would disagree with you, because quite frankly, they did make a difference. It made guns harder to sell. It made if harder just to keep an ffl. You can call them meaningless all you want, fact of the matter they're only meaningless to those who dont buy and sell guns, to anyone who actually does-especially those that actively sell the guns (legally I might add) they have indeed had an impact on the gun market.

 

And let's not forget all the laws he has attempted to pass and failed, because they were such junk laws even he couldn't pull them off. Kind of like this ammunition law.

I buy and sell guns. It is no harder today than it was 8 years ago.  As I said I use guns as an investment option so I buy and sell them accordingly.  I call them meaningless because an executive action carries no weight of law behind it, it is really nothing more than a suggestion by the president. 

[Running Gator]

1 minute ago, Davida said:

totally off

So, once again instead of snippy remarks give us a list of all the new laws that have made it harder to buy and/or sell guns.  If you cannot do so, then you are just talking to hear yourself talk.  So, I will be waiting for your list to prove that I am "totally off"

[ayin jade]

3 hours ago, Out of the Shadows said:

Even if it is meaningless, it proves my point...he is not trying to take your guns away, despite the fact we have been fed that line of bunk for 8 year.

It doesnt have to be obama. California recently passed a tough gun law. Chicago has tough gun laws that were enacted during this administration. Should there be democrat appointees to scotus, we could easily see gun rights erode further nationwide.

[Running Gator]

1 hour ago, ayin jade said:

It doesnt have to be obama. California recently passed a tough gun law. Chicago has tough gun laws that were enacted during this administration. 

As is the right of every state or city.  I do not blame city or state votes on the president.