HOMOSEXUALITY - VS - SCRIPTURE

[Jason Yzaguirre]

1 hour ago, warrior12 said:

 God made his judgement clear already and you say that you cannot be a judge of that lifestyle. God said, "It's an abomination ", end of story.    

You are sitting on the fence brother, you have to choose which side you want to be.  No one can serve two masters, the results are 

 

No. Judgement is what we face by the Almighty when he is ready for us to be done with our individual lives and then judges us there. So no, you are not qualified to judge, not me, not anyone, only God can. I'm not sitting on any fence but you may want to know your place in Gods eyes there brother. I live by the teachings of Jesus Christ and I will treat any person with respect nor will I judge them for their actions and choices. I am nothing that resembles perfection and I am sinner. We all are. If someone is homosexual, is of a different religion, and so on, then that is their path that has nothing to do with me or anyone else but them. 

[BeauJangles]

22 minutes ago, Jason Yzaguirre said:

The OP does make that clear in a slightly few more words. The point I was making is that he was giving sources to back up his point.

Sure, no problem, brother. With my dyslexia, suspected retinopathy, including an already case of diabetes type II, with dry eye syndrome, coming across articles that lengthy become easily disparaging for me to read. And my glasses prescription badly needs re-updating also. All that in mind further complicates my visual capabilities. And that's my point. 

[warrior12]

8 minutes ago, Jason Yzaguirre said:

No. Judgement is what we face by the Almighty when he is ready for us to be done with our individual lives and then judges us there. So no, you are not qualified to judge, not me, not anyone, only God can. I'm not sitting on any fence but you may want to know your place in Gods eyes there brother. I live by the teachings of Jesus Christ and I will treat any person with respect nor will I judge them for their actions and choices. I am nothing that resembles perfection and I am sinner. We all are. If someone is homosexual, is of a different religion, and so on, then that is their path that has nothing to do with me or anyone else but them. 

Well, actually God did the judging for you and pronounced it clearly.  I know what you mean in your statement above and  yes you are correct that we are to treat our fellow mankind with love and respect.  However, you do follow guidelines in the teaching of Gods word and some statues are clear and without mistake or then you make your own judgement as to what God condemns.

Whatever each one of us do here, you are correct in that we would each be judged.   There is something though that we have to abide by and it is his moral statues that he has outlined for us .  We are to edify one another and the word has plenty of scripture to amplify that.   We are talking about the things that God hates and we cannot wink an eye at it.   

There are ways we go about showing the teachings to others that would feel offensive . The bible says to be wise as serpents and gentle as doves.  So the onus is one you to show your brothers  the errors in their paths ways that God clearly hates.

I am not naive of the subject and the antagonism that it brings forth, but we can either bury our heads in the sand or look for the opportunity to enlighten those who are being misled into a false sense of hope. 

 

 James 5 King James Version (KJV)

¹⁹ Brethren, if any of you do err from the truth, and one convert him;

²⁰ Let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins.

[warrior12]

7 minutes ago, BeauJangles said:

Sure, no problem, brother. With my dyslexia, suspected retinopathy, including an already case of diabetes type II, with dry eye syndrome, coming across articles that lengthy become easily disparaging for me to read. And my glasses prescription badly needs re-updating also. All that in mind further complicates my visual capabilities. And that's my point. 

+2

- diabetes

[BeauJangles]

Just now, warrior12 said:

+2

- diabetes

what? 

[BeauJangles]

Sure, no problem, brother. With my dyslexia, suspected retinopathy, including an already case of diabetes type II, with dry eye syndrome, coming across articles that lengthy become easily disparaging for me to read. And my glasses prescription badly needs re-updating also. All that in mind further complicates my visual capabilities. And that's my point. 

•  1
•  1

warrior12 reacted to this

•  

Is there something humorous you find about my health issues, bro? 

 

[Jason Yzaguirre]

8 minutes ago, BeauJangles said:

Sure, no problem, brother. With my dyslexia, suspected retinopathy, including an already case of diabetes type II, with dry eye syndrome, coming across articles that lengthy become easily disparaging for me to read. And my glasses prescription badly needs re-updating also. All that in mind further complicates my visual capabilities. And that's my point. 

It's all good. I like short and too the point but I also give some kind of kudos to someone who takes that much time to share info like that because obviously they devote a lot of time, study, and thought. 

[BeauJangles]

9 minutes ago, warrior12 said:

+2

- diabetes

Oh. You mean I should have stated it as type II diabetes? I see... picky, picky. Tacky to take humor of my health issues also. Very well, then. Your equation is incorrect though. Even someone who is mathematically challenged like myself can clearly see that. It's why I gave you this. 

what? 

comprende amigo? 

[BeauJangles]

 

1. 1. • What Is Diabetes Type Two - What Is Diabetes Type Two

        https://www.ask.com/What Is Diabetes Type Two

         

        Ask.com

        AdAsk.com is the #1 Q&A service delivering the best answers from across the web. Answers updated daily for What Is Diabetes Type Two.

        ask.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month

        Ask Questions · Millions Of Answers · Popular Q&A · Images, Videos & More

   •  

 

[warrior12]

5 minutes ago, BeauJangles said:

Oh. You mean I should have stated it as type II diabetes? I see... picky, picky. Tacky to take humor of my health issues also. Very well, then. Your equation is incorrect though. Even someone who is mathematically challenged like myself can clearly see that. It's why I gave you this. 

what? 

comprende amigo? 

Yo amigo.  so sorry. I mean to a +1  and - diabetes.  I will now proceed to explano'.     

+1                  =I have all the conditions similar to yours , so I second your statement.

- Diabetes   = I ain't have this one yet.  

si'