Inventor of mRNA Vaccine Asks One Inconvenient Question: ‘This Looks Like a Very Plausible Scenario…’

[other one]

2 minutes ago, Whyme said:

Would those 616,929 people have been better off without the vaccine?

Those 626939 did not have the vaccine.  The vast majority died before the vaccine was available.  Would they have even caught the virus had they been vaccinated.   Don't know.  Would it have made the infection less severe so they wouldn't have died?  Don't know...

 

[Sparks]

14 minutes ago, one.opinion said:

Ok, so the reporting system that isn’t designed to be diagnostic - and, in fact, cannot be diagnostic - is your best evidence? If so, it would be best to be straightforward about that.

Yes continue your denial about the meaning of the tracking system.  And be sure to tell the CDC and FDA about your theory.  They'll listen and clearly they will issue a correction. 

[other one]

That is bogus because the virus causes many different ways of dying. Cdc was just looking at the lung related deaths when that came out...   different times have different agendas.

But if you don't want the vaccine it's OK with me.  And those who would listen to your logic and chance the virus is OK with me also.  Everyone over 55 that dies from it just makes my social security last longer.

Well just let the gene pool take care of itself.

[Sparks]

1 minute ago, other one said:

Everyone over 55 that dies from it just makes my social security last longer.

Well just let the gene pool take care of itself.

Seriously? 

[other one]

2 minutes ago, Sparks said:

Seriously? 

Seriously...   if I got upset everytime I saw people doing dumb things, I'd be miserable my whole life. 

[one.opinion]

8 minutes ago, Sparks said:

Yes continue your denial about the meaning of the tracking system.  And be sure to tell the CDC and FDA about your theory.  They'll listen and clearly they will issue a correction. 

I’m under no illusion of what the VAERS system can and cannot do (and neither is the CDC nor FDA). As I mentioned, I’m a participant and have seen what constitutes the tracking system first-hand. No amount of snide commenting is a suitable substitute for evidence.

[Sparks]

Just now, other one said:

Seriously...   if I got upset everytime I saw people doing dumb things, I'd be miserable my whole life. 

Yeah, but it looked like you were wishing people dead for your benefit.  I don't think that's good.

[Sparks]

1 minute ago, one.opinion said:

I’m under no illusion of what the VAERS system can and cannot do (and neither is the CDC nor FDA). As I mentioned, I’m a participant and have seen what constitutes the tracking system first-hand. No amount of snide commenting is a suitable substitute for evidence.

I am not being snide, I am being silly.  You are reinventing the VAERS system as a strawman.  It's for tracking deaths and side effects.  But I am done with this topic with you. 

Have a good day.

[one.opinion]

12 minutes ago, Sparks said:

I am not being snide, I am being silly.  You are reinventing the VAERS system as a strawman.  It's for tracking deaths and side effects.  But I am done with this topic with you. 

Have a good day.

Typical - press enough for evidence and he’s done with the conversation.

[Sparks]

Just now, one.opinion said:

Typical - press enough for evidence and he’s done with the conversation.

Typical - show evidence and be presented with a straw man.