Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,980
  • Content Per Day:  0.29
  • Reputation:   2
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/17/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Shiloh, I don't think anybody really wants to listen to sound and Godly advice, exept a few.

Thank you so much for all the time you spend to make people understand that pologamy is and was never pleasing to the Lord and that it never got blessed. God gave Adam a wife and not wifes.

But if you see how much trouble their is in the life style of pologamy , I don't think you can say its a personal blessing, God will can use any circumstansis for good if He wants too, but that does not mean he is blessing the lifestyle of pologamy.

Thanks

Angels:)

Good post! :thumbsup:

  • Replies 277
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,980
  • Content Per Day:  0.29
  • Reputation:   2
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/17/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Shiloh, I don't think anybody really wants to listen to sound and Godly advice, exept a few.

As far as Shiloh's position goes, I agree with part of it. I do believe a one man one woman marriage to be better than a polygamous one, but disagree that God did not bless people who were in such relationships,

None one claims that God did not bless PEOPLE who were in such relationships.

...and in the case of Jacob, I believe it was God's will he have 2 wives and 2 concubines and that he chose to use all 4 of these women to give birth to the 12 men who would be the head of the 12 tribes of Israel. I can't think of a much greater blessing than to be the one who was the Father of these sons, and even be blessed with the priviledge of having one's name changed to Israel by God.

Polygamy was 'accepted' not ordained by God. As angels4u has already said, ' pologamy is and was never pleasing to the Lord and that it never got blessed. God gave Adam a wife and not wifes.

But if you see how much trouble their is in the life style of pologamy , I don't think you can say its a personal blessing, God will can use any circumstansis for good if He wants too, but that does not mean he is blessing the lifestyle of pologamy.'

When you get down to it, the only point I really think we disagree on is that God ever blessed anyone who was in polygamy and that God ever ordained that a polygamous marriage take place.

A disagreement that keeps showing up in this thread is NOT over whether or not God ever blessed anyone who was in polygamy BUT rather over whether or not God blessed the institution of polygamy. God never ordained that a polygamous marriage take place.

I am assuming that Shiloh's belief is that all 12 men who would head the Jewish nation were supposed to be born of Rachel. Since Jacob was tricked into marrying Leah, that is where the problems began. If that is the position he wishes to take, so be it, but I don't see it that way. I don't see why God would bless each of the women with children if that was the case. In reality, since Leah was his first wife, she would be the one you would think would have had all 12 children and the other 3 left barren, but that didn't happen.

Were supposed to be born of Rachel? Not a living soul can ever say such and such was supposed to be born of such and such. Ludicrous. God blessed the women, no matter what the the case was.

In conclusion, both Angels4u and Firehill have endorsed Shiloh's position so that means that they also agree that polygamy is not a sin. It may be inferior to a one man one woman marriage, but it is not a sin. Since the only area we disagree on is over God blessing someone in polygamy, and since it is a matter of opinion, this is not really worth arguing over. Shiloh, and his supporters Angels4u and Firehill all believe these men and women were blessed "in spite of" their polygamy, and I believe they were simply blessed. Not that great of a difference when you really look at it. Maybe LadyC was right and the debate has run it's course. Only time will tell.

Not only is it 'inferior' but it is also perverse. No one disagress over whether or not God blessed someone in polygamy. (How many times does this need to be said?) Fact not opinion: God blessed people in such relationships not the relationship of polygamy itself. Yes, 'in spite of' AND 'simply blessed!' The GREAT difference is between the blessing of the instititution of polygamy and God blessing the people in such relationship.

Guest shiloh357
Posted
I do believe a one man one woman marriage to be better than a polygamous one, but disagree that God did not bless people who were in such relationships
Yeah and for the 100th time, I did not say that God did not bless people who were involved in polygamy. If you bothered to actually slow down and read what I said, I said that there is no evidence that polygamy itself is blessed by God. God blessed people in spite of polygamy, not because of it.

I believe it was God's will he have 2 wives and 2 concubines and that he chose to use all 4 of these women to give birth to the 12 men who would be the head of the 12 tribes of Israel.
You can believe that if you want, but the Bible does not say it was God's Will for Jacob to engage in that behavior. Abraham did the same thing, and it only caused more problems for his descendents for generations. The Bible simply tells us what Jacob did. It does not say that God caused Jacob to sleep with the concubines. It does not say that God blessed those unions. It makes no value judgement either way. However that does not mean it was right, or that it was God's best. God's permission is not the same as God's approval.

Since the only area we disagree on is over God blessing someone in polygamy, and since it is a matter of opinion, this is not really worth arguing over.
No, you just don't pay attention. I never said that God did not bless anyone who was in polygamy. They were blessed in spite of it. Just like God blesses people in spite of the times they are not in his Will, even in our day.

I am assuming that Shiloh's belief is that all 12 men who would head the Jewish nation were supposed to be born of Rachel. Since Jacob was tricked into marrying Leah, that is where the problems began. If that is the position he wishes to take, so be it, but I don't see it that way. I don't see why God would bless each of the women with children if that was the case. In reality, since Leah was his first wife, she would be the one you would think would have had all 12 children and the other 3 left barren, but that didn't happen.
God worked through the situation even if it was not his best. Jacob would have been within his right to throw Leah out. He didn't though. God's best was for Jacob to marry the woman he loved. Why would it have been problematic for Rachel to bear all 12 children. Is it any more problematic than Sarah giving birth at age 90? The Bible shows us that God can salvage our situations and bring His Will to fruition despite less than desirable circumstances such as polygamy.

It may be inferior to a one man one woman marriage, but it is not a sin.
It is not just inferior. It is discouraged in the New Testament. It prevents any Christian involved in a polygamist arrangement from holding a leadership role in the Church. Monogamy is the Will of God, and the only perfect, God-endorsed/ordained marriage arrangement.

  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  8
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  474
  • Content Per Day:  0.07
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/31/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

I can't prove it one way or the other, but I have thoughts that God was being compassionate towards Leah and the 2 concubines by blessing their womb. They were in a marriage where Rachel was loved and for them not to be able to bear children would of probably left them more lonely and humiliated. God saw fit to give them children to raise and allow them to be mothers, too.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.73
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.75
  • Reputation:   2,254
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted

That is what the Scriptures say - so Mrs.SE you are correct.

Also with Jacob's polygamy, the implication in Scripture is that it was a punishment. Seriously! Jacob who won his birthright through deceit in turn was deceived, and as a result ended up with two wives rather than one. The other two wives came as a result of jealousy and bickering between the two sisters. Oh yeah, God's way. :laugh:

As for Abraham's polygamy, he was chosen by God while in a single union. Taking in Hagar was a sin that led to grief, and continues still to lead to grief. (Hint: who do Muslims claim to be the child of promise? Not Isaac. :24: ) The other wife Abraham took came after Hagar (who had been a concubine, not a wife) was cast away and after Sarah died.

As for David, has anyone else read this in the Torah?

Deuteronomy 17

14 When thou art come unto the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me, like as all the nations that are about me;

15 Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, whom the LORD thy God shall choose: one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother.

16 But he shall not multiply horses to himself, nor cause the people to return to Egypt, to the end that he should multiply horses: forasmuch as the LORD hath said unto you, Ye shall henceforth return no more that way.

17 Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away: neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold. . . .

What example did David give Solomon? And what was Solomon's downfall? (Hint: wives)

Also, notice who the mother of Absalom was?

1 Chronicles 3:2 - The third, Absalom the son of Maachah the daughter of Talmai king of Geshur:

David took a foreign wife - something of which the Lord warned against the people of Israel doing (Exodus 23:32,33; 34:16 Deuteronomy 7:3,4; Joshua 23:12,13).

What was the legacy of David's polygamy? Look at what happened with Absalom. Look at what happened to Solomon.

Speaking of Solomon, do you know who his mother was? Bathsheba, the woman David had an adulterous affair with. If one wishes to argue that the Lord's blessing through polygamy are evidence that polygamy is blessed by the Lord, then can the same be said for adultery?

No! But what we see here is evidence that the Lord is merciful and turns around even our failures and sin for good. In the lives of these men who had multiple wives we see the same thing - God's mercy making good out of our messes. Polygamy is one of these (a big mess, that is).

Guest shiloh357
Posted
I also will acknowledge that Shiloh has added to the fact polygamy is inferior to a traditional marriage that it is also discouraged. I would argue that he is wrong in saying that those in such a relationship are forbidden to hold any leadership positions in the church. They are not allowed to hold the office of bishop or deacon only, but neither are women according to the fact they must be the husband of one wife.
The issue of women in leadership is not pertinent to this discussion, and I will will not address it.

One only need to show from the New Testament where Polygamists were ever used in leadership in the Church. Every single instance of ANYONE having any prominence as far a church leadership was concerned, had no connection to polygamy. Either they were not married, as in Paul's case, or they were monogamous. That is not to say that God could not use polygamists in a layman's office so to speak, but they were never chosen to pastor a Church or serve as deacons. Deacons and Pastors were to be examples in every area of their life, according to 1 Timothy 3. It was their demonstrated ability to manage their own affairs that gave evidence of their fitness to manage the affairs of the congregation. As such, they were examples of Godly behavior, and one of the examples set was monogamy. We are repeatedly told to follow the examples of our Godly leaders who live sober, righteous, lives before the Lord. (1 Cor 4:6; 1 Cor 11:1 Phil 3:17; 4:9; 1 Thess 1:6,7; 2 Thess 3:7,9; 1 Tim 4:12; Tit 2:7; 1 Pet 5:3). By setting up men who were monogamous in marriage as examples to be followed, it was discouragement to younger men from following the practice of polygamy.

Now, how can I make the "ludicrous" statement that so and so was supposed to be born of so and so? Simple. According to Shiloh, there is no reason to believe Rachel couldn't have given birth to 12 children. I agree. He also believes it was God's plan that Rachel be Jacob's only wife, yet at the same time, it was obviously God's plan Jacob have 12 sons to make up the head of the future 12 tribes. As such, if you believe God didn't really want Jacob to have 2 wives and 2 concubines, but really wanted him to be with Rachel, then it stands to reason it would have been his plan she have all 12 sons. This is not rocket science. If you Firehill are disputing this, then you must endorse the fact God's will was that the 12 children be born of the women they were born to meaning he endorsed polygamy in this instance.
God permits a lot of things to happen that He does not endorse. God works His Will through things that It was not in His perfect will to occur. That does not mean He endorses the event in question namely that Jacob married two women and slept with two concubines. It simply means that even when man strays from God's perfect plan, God is able to salvage the situation and continue to bring about his Will.

Had Abraham not slept with Hagar, many of Israel's woes might never have occurred. Much of the pain Israel faced historically was because of the sons of Ishmael. Had Abraham and Sarah been patient, the biblical history of Israel would have turned out entirely different. God would have healed Rachel's barrenness without resorting concubines, if Jacob had waited on the Lord. There was no endorsement of polygamy in this instance. God does not endorse what He does not ordain.


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  17
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  206
  • Content Per Day:  0.03
  • Reputation:   1
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/04/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/25/1978

Posted
hmh,Aug 17 2005, 09:49 PM]

Interesting how it started with one man and woman with Adam and Eve.

Guest drbelitz
Posted

hmh,Aug 17 2005, 09:49 PM]

Interesting how it started with one man and woman with Adam and Eve.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  121
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  2,782
  • Content Per Day:  0.35
  • Reputation:   49
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  06/14/2003
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

The Mormon tenet of polygamy advanced by, and openly practiced by its first two Presidents, Smith & Young, is rightly condemned as a severe offence to the essential biblical dignity and equality of womanhood.

http://arthurdurnan.freeyellow.com


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.73
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.75
  • Reputation:   2,254
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted
I can't prove it one way or the other, but I have thoughts that God was being compassionate towards Leah and the 2 concubines by blessing their womb. They were in a marriage where Rachel was loved and for them not to be able to bear children would of probably left them more lonely and humiliated. God saw fit to give them children to raise and allow them to be mothers, too.

Before responding here, let me say that in the case of the post by Mrs Saved Eternal, I don't necessarily agree with your conclusions, but respect your opinion.

Butero:

Genesis 29:31-35

31 And when the LORD saw that Leah was hated, he opened her womb: but Rachel was barren.

32 And Leah conceived, and bare a son, and she called his name Reuben: for she said, Surely the LORD hath looked upon my affliction; now therefore my husband will love me.

33 And she conceived again, and bare a son; and said, Because the LORD hath heard that I was hated, he hath therefore given me this son also: and she called his name Simeon.

34 And she conceived again, and bare a son; and said, Now this time will my husband be joined unto me, because I have born him three sons: therefore was his name called Levi.

35 And she conceived again, and bare a son: and she said, Now will I praise the LORD: therefore she called his name Judah; and left bearing.

Genesis 30:16-21

16 And Jacob came out of the field in the evening, and Leah went out to meet him, and said, Thou must come in unto me; for surely I have hired thee with my son's mandrakes. And he lay with her that night.

17 And God hearkened unto Leah, and she conceived, and bare Jacob the fifth son.

18 And Leah said, God hath given me my hire, because I have given my maiden to my husband: and she called his name Issachar.

19 And Leah conceived again, and bare Jacob the sixth son.

20 And Leah said, God hath endued me with a good dowry; now will my husband dwell with me, because I have born him six sons: and she called his name Zebulun.

21 And afterwards she bare a daughter, and called her name Dinah.

If you likewise read about the sons born by the handmaidens of Leah and Rachel, you will see that they all came out of Leah's cry for love and Rachel's jealousy for children.

If you read further in Genesis, you will see the dysfunction passed on to Jacob's children. Reuban slept with one of Jacob's concubines. Judah had the situation with his sons and daughter-in-law. The 10 had hatred of Joseph due to Jacob's favor.

The story of Jacob would make great "Reality TV" :wub:

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...