Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  962
  • Topics Per Day:  0.19
  • Content Count:  9,915
  • Content Per Day:  1.93
  • Reputation:   6,063
  • Days Won:  9
  • Joined:  04/07/2011
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
1 minute ago, pinacled said:

How then did she know of and How to perform a circumcision if it wasnt a tradition already established by her fore father avraham.

Not sure how anyone would deem circumcision "barbaric". Much less project such a thought on tzipporah.

Please explain how circumcision is "barbaric".

 

I did not say it was, but that she PROBABLY felt that way.

 


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  18
  • Topic Count:  7
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  8,905
  • Content Per Day:  2.46
  • Reputation:   2,975
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  06/05/2015
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
6 hours ago, pinacled said:

Demeaning tzipporahs moral character has no advantage.

So why is circumcision considered "barbaric"?

The mother had possession of the child. The child was under her care. 

Till that time the decision to Circumcised the child rested upon her. 

Moses lived with them and he had adopted their ways. 

She was the eldest of the daughter, she was the manager of their household and her father's business. 

The boy was old and they did not Circumcise the boy on the eight day because that was not their customs and they were not from the chosen seed of Issac or Jacob.

From reading the text we can see that she finally yielded to the demand to have the child circumcise, she was upset about that because it was put before her the life of Moses for the boy's Circumcision. 

The Lord wanted the child to be Circumcised because he wanted the boy to be with Moses and to integrate with the other people from the tribes of Jacob. 

We see that the Lord did not separate Moses from his children.

He did not asked him to leave his family, to separate from his family to do his work.

We see that the Lord gave them an Inheritance among the children of Israel, that means that Moses Inheritance fall to them...

Aaron family inherited the Priesthood but it was not the same for the position Moses was holding.

Moses position was not pass to his children.

Moses was a LEADER but he was not a King. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Huh?  I don't get it. 1

  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  19
  • Topic Count:  368
  • Topics Per Day:  0.12
  • Content Count:  8,068
  • Content Per Day:  2.58
  • Reputation:   5,896
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  09/27/2016
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
9 hours ago, Gershom_young said:

But didn't Zipporah only circumcise one son? My thinking was therefore it was the younger son, possibly because the older was already circumcised.

Zipporah was required to circumcise "on-the-fly", so to speak. She didn't have time to prepare, she didn't have time to change into her "work" clothes, she didn't even have time to get a proper izmel, just grabbing hold of the nearest flint she could find. I would imagine this would have been reason alone for her to be upset, without considering any other issues. This said, does the passage indicate she was disgusted? Some commentaries indicate she didn't agree with circumcision, but I don't really see the proof of that in the passage. And if she was a daughter of Abraham, wouldn't it be more likely that she was disgusted with uncircumcision?

Good questions. My responses: We are not told which son it was, I am just guessing, based on assumptions, because Moses was refusing.

Reading the scriptural narrative, I form an active scene in my mind how it played out, and what Zipporah might have been thinking. What I might have been thinking, but the Hebrew-Jewish mind does not think like our western mind set. Perhaps the choice of my word "disgusted" might not be the best one? 

In my thoughts of the information given to us, in my mind, I picture Zipporah thinking, this man rather die than do what the Lord directed him to do. So, I will not be a widow, I will have to take this matter into my own hands quickly. 

By throwing it, I assume she was not a happy camper. It's only a picture in my mind as I try to visualize it. 

  • Well Said! 1

  • Group:  Junior Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  2
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  109
  • Content Per Day:  0.06
  • Reputation:   54
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/28/2020
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
23 hours ago, JohnD said:

My take on the circumcision of Gershom and Eliezer is that Zipporah was the reason they were not circumcised (perhaps she deemed it barbaric or just not for her boys).

And yet she skillfully performed the circumcision herself with a rock? And remember, if it was about Zipporah, wouldn't it have been both boys who needed circumcising, instead of just one? I'm not sure there is any evidence Zipporah thought circumcision was barbaric, but if she was anything like women today, she would have wanted it done.

And the Lord dealt with the source by threatening to take away her husband in death. And she succumbed / submitted to the will of the Lord and did the deed herself.

IF correct, then Mo was just as henpecked as the rest of us when it comes to our wives putting their foot down. LOL 

I guess this is possible, but her ability to do the circumcision indicates to me there may have been another cause - Moses himself, perhaps? Wasn't Zipporah sent away at a later date - this also is not usually the case with henpecking wives, who like to be about in order to have someone to peck.

 

 

  • Brilliant! 1

  • Group:  Junior Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  2
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  109
  • Content Per Day:  0.06
  • Reputation:   54
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/28/2020
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
1 hour ago, pinacled said:

I presume you missed the part where the midianites are decendents of avraham. Meaning circumcision is a part of their customs. Not sure who taught you otherwise. But that is what is called inference without evidence. 

So how or why is circumcision "barbaric"?

It's not, or it wouldn't still be done routinely today. Might be a little painful for the child (if anyone even noticed), but this would probably pale in comparison to the pain experienced by the mother during the birth itself.

  • Loved it! 1

  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  4
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,140
  • Content Per Day:  0.52
  • Reputation:   221
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  05/02/2019
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
On 9/23/2021 at 6:14 PM, pinacled said:

I'm glad you've engaged in a conversation of oil.

There are very few persons who will look beyond the rez(surface) of moshe upbringing away from the wisdom of The Most High. Something of which reminds me of, "this worlds wisdom is foolishness......"[1 Corinthians 3:15] The wisdom moshe had attained from the egyptians was chaff in comparison.

He was like a child before the burning voice and willing to recieve. Then after hearing. Faith led moshe to serve dilligantly till his last breath on a particular yom(day). In Doing so, A provision was given for the following generations till salvation was to be revealed.

Moshe first born gershom was given responsibilty of the heavenly treasures after all. 1 chronicles 26:24-

 Blessings Always

“Most people don't consider the weight moshe carried. He was a stranger to covenant. Raised far from his inheritance.”

“Courage is measured by the distance a person will walk in faith.”

Amen

  • Thumbs Up 1

  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  4
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,140
  • Content Per Day:  0.52
  • Reputation:   221
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  05/02/2019
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
On 9/23/2021 at 7:35 PM, pinacled said:

I'm curious.

What treasures did gershom first born of moshe accumulate along with his younger sibling?

Was it gold and silver?

Noble thoughts worthy of...?

 

 

 

“Gershom is the gold treasure first born of moshe.

His second born is silver.

Gold in hebrew is?  zahav

Silver in hebrew is? keseph

 Gold and silver from Moshe is sod level.”

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...