Jump to content
IGNORED

Climate Change Is Extremely Political And Agenda Serving, Unfortunately It Is Also True


Space_Karen

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  23
  • Topic Count:  29
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  6,160
  • Content Per Day:  2.03
  • Reputation:   2,514
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  01/20/2016
  • Status:  Offline

13 minutes ago, one.opinion said:

I'm not a climate scientist, so there may be better pieces of evidence, but this is my conclusion. There is very strong evidence that greenhouse gases have been steadily on the rise since the Industrial Revolution.

image.png.7e056f23d2431bb1264fe1032289020b.png

https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/climate-change-science/causes-climate-change_.html

It is quite likely that this increase in greenhouse gases is tied to the global warming trend.

image.png.e8a68563178ccd1e3c60f2716f51ed55.png

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/GlobalWarming/page2.php

The rate of increase has nearly doubled over the last 50 years. This graph is a little old, having stopped at 2005, but the warming trend remains steadily increasing.

There is always half-truths in these figures, and horrible math.   In Al Gore's movie, he implies these trends, but on his own chart it is heat that precedes Co2, and not the other way around. 

Government needs something unsolvable to 'solve' to keep the money flowing.  All they need is for you to believe, and to hand over your wallet. 

If you want to see the math dissected, I could provide you a video that shows it's flaws, but it would require you to watch at least some of it, to stray from the CNN agenda, and the math might make your head explode, ... but do you want to try?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  29
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,240
  • Content Per Day:  2.09
  • Reputation:   1,356
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  07/03/2017
  • Status:  Offline

2 minutes ago, Sparks said:

If you want to see the math dissected, I could provide you a video that shows it's flaws, but it would require you to watch at least some of it, to stray from the CNN agenda, and the math might make your head explode, ... but do you want to try?

Look at the data I provided, then see if you can "dissect" that. Thank you for the good laugh, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  23
  • Topic Count:  29
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  6,160
  • Content Per Day:  2.03
  • Reputation:   2,514
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  01/20/2016
  • Status:  Offline

18 minutes ago, one.opinion said:

Look at the data I provided, then see if you can "dissect" that. Thank you for the good laugh, though.

I would not be the one to dissect it.  Remember the part about a video that would?  People who understand math can follow the formulas, and spot any flaws with it.   When formulas for light to heat conversion, for example, are missing then you know you are being conned. 

Well, I know you are being conned, but you don't.  :emot-nod:

So, exactly where is the math formula for this graph?  I bet you didn't even look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  7
  • Topic Count:  437
  • Topics Per Day:  0.28
  • Content Count:  3,232
  • Content Per Day:  2.07
  • Reputation:   417
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/06/2020
  • Status:  Offline

We are set to have a record cold winter which will provide enough snow to refill the lakes, However people should probably dump their pools and Modli should start selling clothing again. :noidea:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  29
  • Topic Count:  599
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  56,264
  • Content Per Day:  7.56
  • Reputation:   27,993
  • Days Won:  271
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Offline

2 hours ago, believeinHim said:

Modli should start selling clothing again.

when did they stop?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  29
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,240
  • Content Per Day:  2.09
  • Reputation:   1,356
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  07/03/2017
  • Status:  Offline

7 hours ago, Sparks said:

So, exactly where is the math formula for this graph?  I bet you didn't even look.

These graphs use data points, they are not graphing an equation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  23
  • Topic Count:  29
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  6,160
  • Content Per Day:  2.03
  • Reputation:   2,514
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  01/20/2016
  • Status:  Offline

1 hour ago, one.opinion said:

These graphs use data points, they are not graphing an equation.

Yes, and how did they figure out where to place the data points? 

We already know thanks to Climate Gate I and II, that they fudged the math so the agenda serving data points are wherever they want them, despite reality. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  29
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,240
  • Content Per Day:  2.09
  • Reputation:   1,356
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  07/03/2017
  • Status:  Offline

3 minutes ago, Sparks said:

Yes, and how did they figure out where to place the data points?

By taking measurements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  23
  • Topic Count:  29
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  6,160
  • Content Per Day:  2.03
  • Reputation:   2,514
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  01/20/2016
  • Status:  Offline

3 minutes ago, one.opinion said:

By taking measurements.

Yes, and then lying about them with bad math.  Climate Gate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  29
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,240
  • Content Per Day:  2.09
  • Reputation:   1,356
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  07/03/2017
  • Status:  Offline

17 hours ago, Sparks said:

Yes, and then lying about them with bad math.  Climate Gate.

You are claiming that the IPCC cannot be trusted because of supposed lies, but you are going to literally make up a story about the IPCC claiming that Florida would be underwater by now. To top it off, you probably do not even recognize any inconsistency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...