Jump to content
IGNORED

Rush Limbaugh nominated for 2007 Nobel Peace Prize


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  24
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  3,292
  • Content Per Day:  0.49
  • Reputation:   11
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/21/2007
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
rush has done a good enough job of slandering himself and tightening his own noose without anyones help i agree with that

Let he who is without sin, cast the first stone. -- Jesus


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  22
  • Topic Count:  155
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  7,464
  • Content Per Day:  0.96
  • Reputation:   8,810
  • Days Won:  57
  • Joined:  03/30/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/12/1952

Posted
RIGHT ON! Rush Limbaugh for the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize. There's not another real possible candidate within at least a million miles of R.L.! Least of all, Leftist/socialist Algore!

Yes Al Gore does have a tendancy to be full of himself doesn't he? they say he may be running for president. Don't know it that is true but Lord help us is he is.

http://arthurdurnan.freeyellow.com


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  811
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  7,338
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   76
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Holy Moley!

I put up this story 'cause I thought it was funny! Nine pages you people wrote! :) Do any of you think for one minute Rush would want to have anything to do with a group that recognizes abortionists, communists and the like? No way!

And for all you Rush haters out there...I'd wager most of you haven't listened to him.

Y'all are too funny!


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  1,360
  • Topics Per Day:  0.20
  • Content Count:  7,866
  • Content Per Day:  1.16
  • Reputation:   26
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/22/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/18/1946

Posted

Algore would have no chance of winning.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  811
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  7,338
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   76
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Algore would have no chance of winning.

If he does we'll never hear the end of him. Talk about your global warming! What if it was a tie between Rush and Algore??

:):24:


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  114
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  4,015
  • Content Per Day:  0.56
  • Reputation:   8
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  12/15/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
I disagree with you here. forrest is the one who has been slandering and maligning Rush Limbaugh; and he is being called on it; Remember Jesus confronted the pharisees and rebuked them!

1. How do you slander someone with their own words?

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Rush_Limbaugh

2. How do you slander someone when you point out they have been married and divorced 3 times, when they have indeed been married and divorced 3 times?

Limbaugh was first married on September 24, 1977 to Roxy Maxine McNeely, a sales secretary at radio station WHB in Kansas City, Missouri. They were married at the Centenary United Methodist Church in Cape Girardeau. In March 1980, McNeely filed for divorce, citing "incompatibility." They were formally divorced on July 10, 1980.

In 1983, Limbaugh married Michelle Sixta, a college student and usherette at the Kansas City Royals Stadium Club. They were divorced in 1990, and she remarried the following year.

On May 27, 1994, Limbaugh married Marta Fitzgerald, a 35-year-old aerobics instructor, whom he met via the CompuServe online service. They were married at the house of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who officiated. On June 11, 2004, when the couple separated,[12] Limbaugh announced on the air, "Marta has consented to my request for a divorce, and we have mutually agreed to seek an amicable separation. As I said, it's a personal matter and I want to keep it that way. I don't intend to say any more about this on the air." The divorce was finalized in December 2004.[13]

He has no children from any of his marriages.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_Limbaugh

That is not slander, it is simply stating facts about him and quoting him. An example of slander would be to claim that he was a closeted radical muslim, and then to quote an article from a news organization that was owned by a man who claimed to be the messiah sent to earth because Jesus was a failure. That would be slander, as it would have little to no basis in reality, and would be meant to smear someone. :)


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  1,360
  • Topics Per Day:  0.20
  • Content Count:  7,866
  • Content Per Day:  1.16
  • Reputation:   26
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/22/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/18/1946

Posted

He has been married 3 times, has had three bitter divorces.

How do you know his divorces were bitter?

I'll ask again.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  179
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  3,941
  • Content Per Day:  0.52
  • Reputation:   3
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  10/28/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  10/08/1964

Posted

I disagree with you here. forrest is the one who has been slandering and maligning Rush Limbaugh; and he is being called on it; Remember Jesus confronted the pharisees and rebuked them!

1. How do you slander someone with their own words?

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Rush_Limbaugh

2. How do you slander someone when you point out they have been married and divorced 3 times, when they have indeed been married and divorced 3 times?

Limbaugh was first married on September 24, 1977 to Roxy Maxine McNeely, a sales secretary at radio station WHB in Kansas City, Missouri. They were married at the Centenary United Methodist Church in Cape Girardeau. In March 1980, McNeely filed for divorce, citing "incompatibility." They were formally divorced on July 10, 1980.

In 1983, Limbaugh married Michelle Sixta, a college student and usherette at the Kansas City Royals Stadium Club. They were divorced in 1990, and she remarried the following year.

On May 27, 1994, Limbaugh married Marta Fitzgerald, a 35-year-old aerobics instructor, whom he met via the CompuServe online service. They were married at the house of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who officiated. On June 11, 2004, when the couple separated,[12] Limbaugh announced on the air, "Marta has consented to my request for a divorce, and we have mutually agreed to seek an amicable separation. As I said, it's a personal matter and I want to keep it that way. I don't intend to say any more about this on the air." The divorce was finalized in December 2004.[13]

He has no children from any of his marriages.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_Limbaugh

That is not slander, it is simply stating facts about him and quoting him. An example of slander would be to claim that he was a closeted radical muslim, and then to quote an article from a news organization that was owned by a man who claimed to be the messiah sent to earth because Jesus was a failure. That would be slander, as it would have little to no basis in reality, and would be meant to smear someone. :)

You didnt "simply state facts and quote him".

You claimed he wasnt man enough to even keep a wife.

So dont play innocent victim.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  114
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  4,015
  • Content Per Day:  0.56
  • Reputation:   8
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  12/15/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
I disagree with you.

forrest is regurgitating liberal talking points from left wing hate sites.

He has NOT been respectful at all.

The comment about rush not being able to "keep a wife" is very disrespectful to all who has had a divorce.

Like it was the mans fault for not being able to keep his wife happy.

It's like me saying that hillary cant keep her husband satisfied,why else would he cheat on her.

It's just wrong and disrespectful.

Giaour we are not talking about someone who has been married once and then divorced. We are talking about someone who has had three marriages, none of them lasting over a few years, and three divorces.

Moreover, I did not quote single left wing site. Time magazine, and wikipedia are not left wing sites. All I did was point out that he had been married and divorced three times, and provided several of his quotes. If he did not want others calling him out as a hatemonger, then he ought have said many of the things he has said over the years. I remember a few weeks ago after I quoted some of the extremely hateful things that Ann Coulter has said about liberals, that you claimed that she was not a hatemonger. What is a hatemonger then? People like Coulter, Limbaugh, Hannity, and Michael Moore talk about people who disagree with them like a Klansman would talk about minorities. They are hatemongers plain and simple.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  114
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  4,015
  • Content Per Day:  0.56
  • Reputation:   8
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  12/15/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
You didnt "simply state facts and quote him".

You claimed he wasnt man enough to even keep a wife.

So dont play innocent victim.

I never claimed he was not man enough to keep a wife. I insinuated that he was a narcissist and sexist, thus he could not keep a wife. I then quoted him.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...