Rush Limbaugh nominated for 2007 Nobel Peace Prize

[forrestkc]

"As I said earlier, he can't even keep a wife. "

I can over look the hatemonger etc comments but this is just too much.

So every man that has gotten a divorce "CANT keep a wife"?

This is a comment in very poor taste.

The man has made a career out of exploiting the personal failings of others. He has been married 3 times, has had three bitter divorces. It is a fair statement to say that he cannot keep a wife. He is exceedingly sexist in how he portrays women, so it is easy to see why.

[kat8585]

I might also point out that even Matt Drudge himself has said that at best, only about 80% or so of the news reported on the DrudgeReport is true.

Documentation, please.

[kat8585]

Come on, you think that Hannity andColmes is a fair representation of the issues?

So Hannity is a bigger hit than Colmes. That's a good thing.

[forrestkc]

Come on, you think that Hannity andColmes is a fair representation of the issues?

So Hannity is a bigger hit than Colmes. That's a good thing.

Actually, the point is that Hannity purposely picked the weakest lib on earth for his side kick.

[forrestkc]

I might also point out that even Matt Drudge himself has said that at best, only about 80% or so of the news reported on the DrudgeReport is true.

Documentation, please.

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/01/26/time/kinsley.html

The case for Drudge -- who complacently says his reports are 80% accurate -- is that there ought to be a middle ground between the highest standards and none at all. And the Internet, which can be sort of halfway between a private conversation and formal publication, is a good place for that middle ground. The middle ground, of course, should be acknowledged as such, either explicitly or by convention. People should understand that the information they get this way is middling quality -- better than what their neighbor heard at the dry cleaner's but not as good as the New York Times. And Internet sites that aspire to the highest standards of traditional media (like Slate, where I work) should be held to them. But if Drudge claims only 80% accuracy and can make it over that lowered bar, why not?

[forrestkc]

"As I said earlier, he can't even keep a wife. "

I can over look the hatemonger etc comments but this is just too much.

So every man that has gotten a divorce "CANT keep a wife"?

This is a comment in very poor taste.

The man has made a career out of exploiting the personal failings of others. He has been married 3 times, has had three bitter divorces. It is a fair statement to say that he cannot keep a wife. He is exceedingly sexist in how he portrays women, so it is easy to see why.

Actually, I thought about it, and your right, I am only stooping down to Rush's level by pointing that out.

[Guest yod]

c'mon

Do you have anything good to say about anyone that isn't a heretic, socialist, atheist, liberal or communist?

[kat8585]

He has been married 3 times, has had three bitter divorces.

How do you know his divorces were bitter?

[Axxman]

I might also point out that even Matt Drudge himself has said that at best, only about 80% or so of the news reported on the DrudgeReport is true.

Documentation, please.

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/01/26/time/kinsley.html

The case for Drudge -- who complacently says his reports are 80% accurate -- is that there ought to be a middle ground between the highest standards and none at all. And the Internet, which can be sort of halfway between a private conversation and formal publication, is a good place for that middle ground. The middle ground, of course, should be acknowledged as such, either explicitly or by convention. People should understand that the information they get this way is middling quality -- better than what their neighbor heard at the dry cleaner's but not as good as the New York Times. And Internet sites that aspire to the highest standards of traditional media (like Slate, where I work) should be held to them. But if Drudge claims only 80% accuracy and can make it over that lowered bar, why not?

Forrest...

Your are using an article written by a liberal source (CNN) that "claims" something about Matt Drudge that is not true. If you want to start quoting people then you need to source the quote from the individual that made the quote."

The fact of the matter is...Matt Drudge made this quote " I've never talked about the reliability of my sources." -- Matt Drudge, Liberty Round Table, Address Before the National Press Club, June 2, 1998

This is HOW you cite a source so that people can verify it and show that you are not using slander to intentionally impune the reputation of a person. The same can be said of your Rush Limbaugh quotes...while some of them are somewhat recognizeable to actual quotes...some of them are not even verifiable. Matt Drudge does give credit for the "80% accuracy" quote to Newsweek magazines Karen Breslau and claims she made it up. Shocking!

The mainstream press, especially Newsweek, dislikes Drudge because he broke the Monica Lewinski story and exposed how the liberal media was sitting on the story in an effort to protect their man Bill. 80% accurate indeed.

[chapmac]

everyone going gangbuster after forest is like watching all the little mean and ugly girls in the school yard

trying to pull the smart girls pigtail because theyre jealous

i got news for you

forest appears to be one of the few here capable of having an original thought

call him what you like but he has been respectful and honest

cant say the same about a few others