Jump to content
IGNORED

Bush Impeachment Calls Gather Momentum


The Lorax

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  1,360
  • Topics Per Day:  0.21
  • Content Count:  7,866
  • Content Per Day:  1.20
  • Reputation:   26
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/22/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/18/1946

I wonder who Newt was lieing to while he was admonishing and heading up the push for the impeachment of Clinton for lieing... lieing about the same thing, having an affair. :24: Do ya hate ol' Newt as much as Clinton?

Newt wasn't the president, lying to a grand jury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  24
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  3,292
  • Content Per Day:  0.51
  • Reputation:   11
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/21/2007
  • Status:  Offline

I wonder who Newt was lieing to while he was admonishing and heading up the push for the impeachment of Clinton for lieing... lieing about the same thing, having an affair. :24: Do ya hate ol' Newt as much as Clinton?

Ah...another history lesson from Time magazine. Its too bad that liberals write all the history books, cuz we may never remember what actually happened in history...at least not properly.

Clinton lied in front of a Federal Judge. Thats perjury. Thats breaking a federal law. Clinton was charged with obstructing justice. Newt wasn't. Libs will re-write history and say it was about the sex...but it wasn't. It just so happened that Clinton broke the law to hide his infidelity...Newt did not. Newt said, ""I don't think the Congress could move forward only on Lewinsky." He wanted to go back to Whitewater and other investigations. Newt told the Washington Post that he believed only "a pattern of felonies" and "not a single human mistake" could constitute grounds for impeachment. So much for "heading up the push for the impeachment" as you like to put it.

Now believe me...I am not naive enough to think that Newt was being all "christianly" in his softness toward the Clinton affair...he was clearly crossed up and needed to protect himself. I dislike Newt very much for his personal choices, and his very "ugly" treatment of marriage. He clearly does not view marriage the way I do. He clearly needs to learn sexual self-control. And I don't really like that he NOW feels the need to speak on issues of morality. Newt is a good politician, but I wouldn't wanna be married to him.

Now...I don't hate Clinton for having sex with Monica Lewinski, (I don't really "hate" him at all) I truly don't. I very much dislike that a list of respectable women came forward claiming that he grabbed their breasts, or exposed himself to them. One woman claimed rape because he shoved his hand down her pants and fondled her while she struggled to get away. She never testified, and was entered as Jane Doe during the Paula Jones trial. Most of his security staff while he was Governor admitted under oath that they propositioned 100's of girls on Clintons behalf. Thats a little more than an affair in which two people lost their self-control and made a mistake. Clinton is a political genius. But I wouldn't want him to be in the same building with any female I know...or any female you know.

Lastly: This is NOT news. Newts affair has been known for about...5 years now, at least. There is only ONE reason this is coming out AGAIN. Leftist political smear tactic. Liberals own most of the media and they use it to influence people. I find it HILARIOUS that all those hack reporters who told us that "sex was a private matter" it was "none of our business" are gleefully splattering Newts business on the front pages and blogishere's as if it was everybodies right to know....too funny.

Newts two affairs were ugly, and disappointing vs. Clinton's perjury/obstructing justice and laundry list of sexual harassment/rape.

Oh, and the lovely wifey (Hiliary) who stood by her man as he raped and pilliaged feminism...literally, lol.

Its not even close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  1,360
  • Topics Per Day:  0.21
  • Content Count:  7,866
  • Content Per Day:  1.20
  • Reputation:   26
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/22/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/18/1946

Clinton is a political genius.

I never thought of him as a political genius. I always saw right thru him.

Lastly: This is NOT news. Newts affair has been known for about...5 years now, at least. There is only ONE reason this is coming out AGAIN.

The Dems are affraid Newt will run for president, and are afreaid he will do good, so they want to make sure this is all over the place .

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  2,153
  • Content Per Day:  0.33
  • Reputation:   166
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  02/02/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/05/1985

I would rather have a president who slept around and lied about it in court than a president who advocates an aggressive and militaristic international stance, and violates some of our fundamental rights ala legislation. Wiretapping via the "patriot" act cuts into our rights under the mask of "national security".

Yes Clinton lied in court, yes, that was a bad thing. But personally I would rather have Clinton back in office with his own personal brothel underneath the whitehouse than keep Bush around :whistling:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  24
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  3,292
  • Content Per Day:  0.51
  • Reputation:   11
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/21/2007
  • Status:  Offline

I would rather have a president who slept around and lied about it in court than a president who advocates an aggressive and militaristic international stance, and violates some of our fundamental rights ala legislation. Wiretapping via the "patriot" act cuts into our rights under the mask of "national security".

Yes Clinton lied in court, yes, that was a bad thing. But personally I would rather have Clinton back in office with his own personal brothel underneath the whitehouse than keep Bush around :whistling:

Stunning. You'd rather have a criminal as President who violated the "rights" of who knows how many women...then sent bombs into another country to deflect attention from it.

You dislike Bush because of ideological differences...thats fair. But to say you'd rather support a criminal who agrees with you, rather than someone you disagree with...thats why I am so anti-liberal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  2,153
  • Content Per Day:  0.33
  • Reputation:   166
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  02/02/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/05/1985

Stunning. You'd rather have a criminal as President who violated the "rights" of who knows how many women...then sent bombs into another country to deflect attention from it.

You dislike Bush because of ideological differences...thats fair. But to say you'd rather support a criminal who agrees with you, rather than someone you disagree with...thats why I am so anti-liberal.

Yes. I would rather have the "criminal" Bill Clinton who lied about having sex in front of a courtroom than Bush. Absolutly. I'm not advertising Clinton as doing the correct thing when he lied, but I would much rather have the rest of him in office. I don't care about the little things, its the big things that matter to me. Having sex with a secretary? Little thing. Being in a state of aggressive military action for close to 6 years? Big thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  2
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,263
  • Content Per Day:  0.20
  • Reputation:   2
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/11/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  02/17/1961

I would rather have a president who slept around and lied about it in court than a president who advocates an aggressive and militaristic international stance, and violates some of our fundamental rights ala legislation. Wiretapping via the "patriot" act cuts into our rights under the mask of "national security".

Yes Clinton lied in court, yes, that was a bad thing. But personally I would rather have Clinton back in office with his own personal brothel underneath the whitehouse than keep Bush around :emot-highfive:

Stunning. You'd rather have a criminal as President who violated the "rights" of who knows how many women...then sent bombs into another country to deflect attention from it.

You dislike Bush because of ideological differences...thats fair. But to say you'd rather support a criminal who agrees with you, rather than someone you disagree with...thats why I am so anti-liberal.

WOW!! talk about revisionist history!! If I remember correctly, he lied about having an affair (who wouldn't). What crimes are YOU talking about? Who's rights are YOU talking about? I don't believe he has been convicted of any crime.

What proof do you have that he "then sent bombs into another country to deflect attention from it." oh none, you mean it's just something you heard on Rush's show? :21:

He did send christians to kill christians to deflect from his actions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  2
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,263
  • Content Per Day:  0.20
  • Reputation:   2
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/11/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  02/17/1961

Stunning. You'd rather have a criminal as President who violated the "rights" of who knows how many women...then sent bombs into another country to deflect attention from it.

You dislike Bush because of ideological differences...thats fair. But to say you'd rather support a criminal who agrees with you, rather than someone you disagree with...thats why I am so anti-liberal.

Yes. I would rather have the "criminal" Bill Clinton who lied about having sex in front of a courtroom than Bush. Absolutly. I'm not advertising Clinton as doing the correct thing when he lied, but I would much rather have the rest of him in office. I don't care about the little things, its the big things that matter to me. Having sex with a secretary? Little thing. Being in a state of aggressive military action for close to 6 years? Big thing.

Class time.

Sooo clinton sending the military in to kill christians is no big thing right!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  2,153
  • Content Per Day:  0.33
  • Reputation:   166
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  02/02/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/05/1985

Stunning. You'd rather have a criminal as President who violated the "rights" of who knows how many women...then sent bombs into another country to deflect attention from it.

You dislike Bush because of ideological differences...thats fair. But to say you'd rather support a criminal who agrees with you, rather than someone you disagree with...thats why I am so anti-liberal.

Yes. I would rather have the "criminal" Bill Clinton who lied about having sex in front of a courtroom than Bush. Absolutly. I'm not advertising Clinton as doing the correct thing when he lied, but I would much rather have the rest of him in office. I don't care about the little things, its the big things that matter to me. Having sex with a secretary? Little thing. Being in a state of aggressive military action for close to 6 years? Big thing.

Class time.

Sooo clinton sending the military in to kill christians is no big thing right!

Compared to the countless lives of christians and non-christians that are being ruined today and have continued to be ruined since post 9/11 ?

No, compared to that, the bombing of Clinton is no big thing.

I'm not arguing that killing is bad. I hate it. But I find it funny that you are accusing Clinton of extending violence, when we have Pres Bush in power now. Seriously, the military action that Clinton advanced is nowhere near the action Bush is and has been advancing. Clinton wasn't perfect. No president was perfect. I would much rather have the imperfections of Clinton than the imperfections of Bush. One's imperfections effected the rights of several women, and one's imperfections effected the lives of hundreds of thousands of people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  2
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,263
  • Content Per Day:  0.20
  • Reputation:   2
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/11/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  02/17/1961

Stunning. You'd rather have a criminal as President who violated the "rights" of who knows how many women...then sent bombs into another country to deflect attention from it.

You dislike Bush because of ideological differences...thats fair. But to say you'd rather support a criminal who agrees with you, rather than someone you disagree with...thats why I am so anti-liberal.

Yes. I would rather have the "criminal" Bill Clinton who lied about having sex in front of a courtroom than Bush. Absolutly. I'm not advertising Clinton as doing the correct thing when he lied, but I would much rather have the rest of him in office. I don't care about the little things, its the big things that matter to me. Having sex with a secretary? Little thing. Being in a state of aggressive military action for close to 6 years? Big thing.

Class time.

Sooo clinton sending the military in to kill christians is no big thing right!

Compared to the countless lives of christians and non-christians that are being ruined today and have continued to be ruined since post 9/11 ?

No, compared to that, the bombing of Clinton is no big thing.

I'm not arguing that killing is bad. I hate it. But I find it funny that you are accusing Clinton of extending violence, when we have Pres Bush in power now. Seriously, the military action that Clinton advanced is nowhere near the action Bush is and has been advancing. Clinton wasn't perfect. No president was perfect. I would much rather have the imperfections of Clinton than the imperfections of Bush. One's imperfections effected the rights of several women, and one's imperfections effected the lives of hundreds of thousands of people.

So you have no problem with clintons war on christians but have a problem with the war on islam. FYI were not killing christians over there in iraq.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 1 reply
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 231 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...