Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  127
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  3,248
  • Content Per Day:  0.80
  • Reputation:   13
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/23/2014
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

i am just asking questions.....

Who is the Great Commission for? one or all???


  • Group:  Graduated to Heaven
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  50
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  4,073
  • Content Per Day:  0.49
  • Reputation:   43
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  10/02/2002
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  08/10/1923

Posted

Getting back to 1Tim.2:12.

In all of Pauls epistles, except the two to Timothy, he usually referred to what was permissable to the church, either by God, Jesus, the Lord or the Holy Spirit. In this case he used the personal pronoun....I.....not any part of the Godhead, but himself personally. It was not in any message to any of the churches, but to his personal friend who was leaning to be a leader. Different apostles had a style of their own of projecting the gospel message and some students have a different way of applying the result.

Ovedya, recently posted this,

Modern-day (that is, at least the past 30 years or so) "preaching" has confused and blurred the line between the two things. Although there were very clear differences between preaching the gospel and teaching in the early church, the modern church has re-interpreted the verses in 1 Tim. according to modern-day practices. The church has gotten entirely to loose in its teaching of the doctrines of the church.

and I agree, and it's the denominational differences that are confusing people. Some denoms will agree with the way I see things and some won't.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  127
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  3,248
  • Content Per Day:  0.80
  • Reputation:   13
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/23/2014
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Getting back to 1Tim.2:12.

In all of Pauls epistles, except the two to Timothy, he usually referred to what was permissable to the church, either by God, Jesus, the Lord or the Holy Spirit. In this case he used the personal pronoun....I.....not any part of the Godhead, but himself personally. It was not in any message to any of the churches, but to his personal friend who was leaning to be a leader. Different apostles had a style of their own of projecting the gospel message and some students have a different way of applying the result.

Ovedya, recently posted this,

Modern-day (that is, at least the past 30 years or so) "preaching" has confused and blurred the line between the two things. Although there were very clear differences between preaching the gospel and teaching in the early church, the modern church has re-interpreted the verses in 1 Tim. according to modern-day practices. The church has gotten entirely to loose in its teaching of the doctrines of the church.

and I agree, and it's the denominational differences that are confusing people. Some denoms will agree with the way I see things and some won't.

True,

Paul would diferentiate between his thoughts and words and God's.....

here he (Paul) uses (as was stated) the pronoun "I" and not God's....

sometimes i wish that the letters the other apostles had been included with Pauls, and Johns and and and, such as Bartholomews..... would be interesting to see....

with the death and resurection of Christ, all the OLD traditions were thrown and tossed and became upside down.....


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  127
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  3,248
  • Content Per Day:  0.80
  • Reputation:   13
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/23/2014
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

a woman was used to bring an entire town to Christ,

was Christ wrong for using a woman to tell (preach, teach ) others about Him?

mike


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  5,258
  • Content Per Day:  0.72
  • Reputation:   42
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  06/16/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/22/1960

Posted

Women are certainly used by Christ to bring people to Him. Actually I think an argument can be made that He is using women today or at least women are responding today more than men!

But if you don't have an organized congregation with administrative functions, which specifically calls and ordains people, then certainly this question of ordaining women or not is totally muddied so I can see some of the confusion.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  366
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  10,933
  • Content Per Day:  1.49
  • Reputation:   212
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  04/21/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

just a thought.......

who was the first one..... THATS RIGHT, THE FIRST ONE.... to preach Christ Resurrected....

who was the one that was the first human to have the knowledge of The Resurrection and then started sharing it with others (preaching it, teaching it, proclaiming it).....

mike

Nothing wrong at all with preaching Christ and Him crucified. That is a subject which all believers - regardless of gender - have been commanded to do.

Yet that is an issue separate from the doctrinal teachings of the church.

If a woman can preach Christ wouldn't that include all things about him??? Why he came, about his Father, his death and resurrection, his kingdom, his inheritance, his everything??? What about all the things Paul said about him? Can a woman not teach those things to? Would these 'doctrinal teachings' you speak of exclude ALL the teachings of Christ (his commandments, his parables, his teachings on his Father and himself, thier oneness, his teachings on the kingdom, his healings, his miracles, his miracles of deliverance, his Lordship...) that were received by his disciples, male and female? Isn't it ALL HIS?

Was a woman who learned from him as a disciple of his also excluded to teach others what she was taught by him? Such things as these are the most important doctrinal teachings of the church. So are women excluded form teaching them? Were his female disciples? Did he exclude them from teaching what he taught them, and his everything? :P

Again, the context is the local church. She can certainly use her teaching gifts. She is limited to using it in certina situations.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  366
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  10,933
  • Content Per Day:  1.49
  • Reputation:   212
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  04/21/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
However, the NT gift of prophecy was very different that the OT understanding of who a prophet was

Agreed. It was somewhat different. But not that different. Prophets were still looked upon as scholars of the sacred scrolls as well as anointed teachers forthtelling revealing the truths already written, including foretelling. They did not however change into spiritualized psychics. That is a modern understanding.

I'll look at the other responses when I have time.

It was actually very different. In the OT to not listen to a prophet was punishable by death. IN the NT we are encouraged to evaluate the message of the prophets for accuracy. Don't know what you mean by "spiritualized physics"


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  5,258
  • Content Per Day:  0.72
  • Reputation:   42
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  06/16/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/22/1960

Posted

What do people think about husband and wife teams?

I made myself I think clear about my views on the ordination of women; however I also do not have a problem with a husband and wife working together in the ministry as long as the male fulfills his biblical role. I have seen this done very effectively in some congregations and have seen it done with big problems in others.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  366
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  10,933
  • Content Per Day:  1.49
  • Reputation:   212
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  04/21/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

3. GOD DOES NOT VIOLATE HIS OWN RULES

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...