Books

[Matthitjah]

To be quite honest, you'd have to pay me a great sum of money to make me touch a book written by Ann Coulter. She might as well name the books "Read about my obsessive hatrid of liberals". I think Ann Coulter is about as unbiased as Michael Moore, meaning avoid at all costs if you're looking for factual information.

Form your own opinions on this stuff, don't let some hate-filled woman tell you what to believe.

She's not hate filled. She illustrates the absurdities of the left by being just as absurd. Her humor/satire is actually intellectually based, so you really need to know the culture to get what she's saying. She speaks tongue in cheek, as opposed to libs, who are soooooo serious it's funny.

No, I would disagree, Ann Coulter is just as crazy as she seems. She is every bit that vile, unhinged, and hateful person that she depicts herself as on T.V. and in her books. She is a textbook narcissist and is probably a sociopath (they don't all kill people, many of them find more creative outlets for their hate and lack of conscience). If Ann Coulters rants are simply satire, then so are the speeches at a skinhead rally.

Brother,

What responsibility do you bear for her supposed anger and hatred?

Peace,

Dave

[forrestkc]

To be quite honest, you'd have to pay me a great sum of money to make me touch a book written by Ann Coulter. She might as well name the books "Read about my obsessive hatrid of liberals". I think Ann Coulter is about as unbiased as Michael Moore, meaning avoid at all costs if you're looking for factual information.

Form your own opinions on this stuff, don't let some hate-filled woman tell you what to believe.

She's not hate filled. She illustrates the absurdities of the left by being just as absurd. Her humor/satire is actually intellectually based, so you really need to know the culture to get what she's saying. She speaks tongue in cheek, as opposed to libs, who are soooooo serious it's funny.

No, I would disagree, Ann Coulter is just as crazy as she seems. She is every bit that vile, unhinged, and hateful person that she depicts herself as on T.V. and in her books. She is a textbook narcissist and is probably a sociopath (they don't all kill people, many of them find more creative outlets for their hate and lack of conscience). If Ann Coulters rants are simply satire, then so are the speeches at a skinhead rally.

Brother,

What responsibility do you bear for her supposed anger and hatred?

Peace,

Dave

Lets just say I have some inside information.

[kat8585]

Why would any liberal, or any objective individual at all want to read the rants of people like Savage or Coulter?

It's just a challenge. Or even call it a dare. Take it or leave it. How do you know they are "rants"? Are they wrong? Can they not back up what they say?

Since you claim to have "inside information" proving Coulter to be hate-filled, I think it's only fair that you share it. You always require proof of everything.

What about the other 2 books?

[forrestkc]

Why would any liberal, or any objective individual at all want to read the rants of people like Savage or Coulter?

It's just a challenge. Or even call it a dare. Take it or leave it. How do you know they are "rants"? Are they wrong? Can they not back up what they say?

Since you claim to have "inside information" proving Coulter to be hate-filled, I think it's only fair that you share it. You always require proof of everything.

What about the other 2 books?

I have read parts of Coulter's books before, specifically the latest one Godless, the chapters on ID and science were beyond absurd, and much of her claims about liberals are half truths at best. I have heard Savage's radio show enough to know that he is nothing but a hatemonger. Those types of books are really not my cup of tea. I would however probably read one of Newts books on history.

[kari21]

I read a lot of political books, and have read several extremely good ones that should be "must read" for every American, but Michael Savage's "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder" is one of the best I've read. The title is the biggest understatement I've ever heard. I thought I pretty much knew what was going on. I didn't have near the clue I thought I had! Talk about a major eye-opener!! I had no idea of the magnitude--it really is a disorder, moreso than I ever thought. He is right on the money on every issue. It's amazing we are still here in a somewhat free country. If liberals can read this and still defend this insanity, they have a worse disorder than I ever dreamed of.

I challenge every liberal to read every page--even if you go in with a pre-determined bias, if you come out with the same one, there is something bad wrong. The best chapters are the ones on illegal immigration and our colleges.

Then I read Ann Coulter's "How to Talk to a Liberal if You Must". Another terrific read. It re-affirms just how bad a mental disorder liberalism really is. Next was Newt's laterst one. The best chapter is the one on Social Secirity.

Then Savage's "The Enemy Within". Before I was one fourth of the way thru, I was livid. By the time I finished it, I could have bitten nails in two.

Michael Gallagher's "Surrounded By Idiots" is a different style, easy reading, but powerful. I read it in less than 2 days.

Now I've started Coulter's "Treason". I never dreamed of such dangerous stuff from liberals.

BTW, I also challenge every "progressive" to read these, too.

Why would any liberal, or any objective individual at all want to read the rants of people like Savage or Coulter?

Thats like saying: "I challenge anyone to open their mind and read Mine Kampf." Unless your a psych major and are looking to profile sociopaths, then what would one possibly get out of such garbage.

Amazing. Liberals are are the same. If anyone disagrees with them, they are "ranting." And they sure do love to pull "Hitler" out of the bag to compare conservatives to.

But what do you expect when they have such scholars as Al Franken, who write such wonderful books as: "Rush Limbaugh is a Big Fat Idiot and Other Observations."

And Michael Moore who said the passengers on the planes on 11 September were scaredy-cats because they were mostly white. "If the passengers had included black men," he claimed, "those killers, with their puny bodies and unimpressive small knives, would have been crushed by the dudes, who as we all know take no disrespect from anybody. ..."

Wow.

But I'm not defending Coulter, who has said some pretty dumb things in the past. But my point is, conservative writers are not all "ranting" when they document liberal hypocrisy and anti-American views.

[kat8585]

Why would any liberal, or any objective individual at all want to read the rants of people like Savage or Coulter?

It's just a challenge. Or even call it a dare. Take it or leave it. How do you know they are "rants"? Are they wrong? Can they not back up what they say?

Since you claim to have "inside information" proving Coulter to be hate-filled, I think it's only fair that you share it. You always require proof of everything.

What about the other 2 books?

I have read parts of Coulter's books before, specifically the latest one Godless, the chapters on ID and science were beyond absurd, and much of her claims about liberals are half truths at best. I have heard Savage's radio show enough to know that he is nothing but a hatemonger. Those types of books are really not my cup of tea. I would however probably read one of Newts books on history.

Is that your "inside informatiom"?

I listen to Savage on the radio, too, but his books go into much more. Maybe, like me, you would find out things you didn't know before. Or are you afraid you would see the truth, with proof, before your eyes?

[Marnie]

To be quite honest, you'd have to pay me a great sum of money to make me touch a book written by Ann Coulter. She might as well name the books "Read about my obsessive hatrid of liberals". I think Ann Coulter is about as unbiased as Michael Moore, meaning avoid at all costs if you're looking for factual information.

Form your own opinions on this stuff, don't let some hate-filled woman tell you what to believe.

She's not hate filled. She illustrates the absurdities of the left by being just as absurd. Her humor/satire is actually intellectually based, so you really need to know the culture to get what she's saying. She speaks tongue in cheek, as opposed to libs, who are soooooo serious it's funny.

No, I would disagree, Ann Coulter is just as crazy as she seems. She is every bit that vile, unhinged, and hateful person that she depicts herself as on T.V. and in her books. She is a textbook narcissist and is probably a sociopath (they don't all kill people, many of them find more creative outlets for their hate and lack of conscience). If Ann Coulters rants are simply satire, then so are the speeches at a skinhead rally.

I thought you were more sophisticated than that, forrestkc.

It's all about the money, even for conservative writers. Her shtick is well written, well rehearsed satire, nothing more. If being feminine and cutesy sold books for Ann, that's what she would be.

[forrestkc]

Is that your "inside informatiom"?

I listen to Savage on the radio, too, but his books go into much more. Maybe, like me, you would find out things you didn't know before. Or are you afraid you would see the truth, with proof, before your eyes?

When I want the truth, I seek it out. When you read books like you quoted, at best your just getting someone's opinion and point of view. Its certainly not objective analysis.

As to the inside info, it goes deeper than that.

[forrestkc]

If you guys want actual satire, turn on The Daily Show. Its the best of the best.

[Fraught]

yep, the daily show i can handle. ann coulter? no way! she comes across as a person that in no way do i want to financially support so buying her book is out of the question. the few times i've seen her on tv, she seemed just too hateful. i had to turn the channel.