Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  7
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  166
  • Content Per Day:  0.03
  • Reputation:   4
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/14/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  03/08/1950

Posted

i predict hillary clinton will be our next president with obama as vice president. jim

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  196
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  1,343
  • Content Per Day:  0.21
  • Reputation:   12
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  01/15/2008
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/03/1964

Posted
i predict hillary clinton will be our next president with obama as vice president. jim

Nah, with Pelosi as Speaker of the House...that would blow the doors off completely of a succession of caucasian white males for 230 years wouldn't it? :emot-hug:


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.72
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.72
  • Reputation:   2,259
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted

OK, this thread has degraded into elementary school tit-for-tat behavior.

Can we please go back to having a mature discussion?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  23
  • Topic Count:  1,294
  • Topics Per Day:  0.20
  • Content Count:  31,762
  • Content Per Day:  4.89
  • Reputation:   9,769
  • Days Won:  115
  • Joined:  09/14/2007
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
My prediction the final ticket will be Obama/Edwards & McCain/Gulliano...Then won't we be in a mess...no choices...Oh yeah, this maybe Ralph Nader's year to make a bigger splash.

I can see Obama and Edwards, but in order for McCain to reach the Christian Conservatives, I think he will need Huckabee.

I have not read all the posts, but Edwards is dropping out, but there is speculation that he will not back either candidate. Maybe he doesn't want to shoot himself in the foot?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  331
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  5,961
  • Content Per Day:  0.72
  • Reputation:   61
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  10/25/2002
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

What choices it looks like we're gonna have.

I'm not impressed with any of it yet...and that goes for both sides...although to be truthful ONE side does bother me more than the other....

I just keep praying.........

I've heard Lieberman (sp?) may be a choice for VP :mgfrog::20: Hubby read that one in the Grand Rapids Press...anyone else hear that little tid-bit?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  1,285
  • Topics Per Day:  0.15
  • Content Count:  17,917
  • Content Per Day:  2.16
  • Reputation:   355
  • Days Won:  19
  • Joined:  10/01/2002
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Grace to you,

Take a look at what a compromise Government has done for Israel. There is no Leadership and at a time of crises there was no decision making process that made any sense. There was just compromise and with ones desperate enemies as well. The War last year showed a lack of Judgement on their leaders part.

That's what we have here, McCain compromises with the Conservatives core beliefs in every area. Some like to say that the Neo-Cons like him because he is strong on the War on terror. However he is not, he opposes supposed torture when there is not other remedy and lives are on the line. He opposes jailing enemy combatants.

There is also this dangerous idea that only he can defeat the Dems. However there is a strong undercurrent among the core of the party that they will stay home.

Thus the Dems will win and this is precisely why you see Progressives and Liberals so for McCain. They know that both Hillary and Obama will make mincemeat out of him.

There is a very good article out today about McCain not being a true Conservative and what kind of appointments he would make to the Supreme Court. It is written by Robert Novak. I will try to find it later today and post the link. The reason that the Progressives and Liberal love McCain and are scared to death of Romney is because McCain is one of them and Romney represents the moral absolutes that they fear the most.

I personally do not like Romney either because of his Mormonism. I just find it very strange that the Progressives and Liberals hate him and are scared to death of him. It makes one wonder and go HMMMMM. :rolleyes:

Peace,

Dave


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  1,285
  • Topics Per Day:  0.15
  • Content Count:  17,917
  • Content Per Day:  2.16
  • Reputation:   355
  • Days Won:  19
  • Joined:  10/01/2002
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Here's that article from Robert Novak. :laugh:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...3003212_pf.html

Quote The Washington Post;

Is McCain a Conservative?

By Robert D. Novak

Thursday, January 31, 2008; A21

As John McCain neared his momentous primary election victory in Florida after a ferocious campaign questioning his conservative credentials, right-wingers buzzed over word that he had privately suggested that Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito was too conservative. In response, McCain said he recalled saying no such thing and added that Alito was a "magnificent" choice. In fact, multiple sources confirm that the senator made negative comments about Alito nine months ago.

McCain, as the "straight talk" candidate, says things off the cuff that he sometimes cannot remember exactly later. Elements of the Republican Party's right wing, uncomfortable with McCain as their prospective presidential nominee, brought the Alito comments to the surface long after the fact for two contrasting reasons. One was a desperate effort to keep McCain from winning in Florida. The other was to get the party's potential nominee on record about key issues before he is nominated.

Those key issues do not include McCain's firmly held nonconservative positions on campaign finance reform and global warming. Rather, conservatives among the second group want two assurances: first, that McCain would veto any tax increase passed by a Democratic Congress; second, that he would not emulate Gerald R. Ford and George H.W. Bush in naming liberal Supreme Court justices such as John Paul Stevens and David Souter.

That was the background for conservative John Fund's Wall Street Journal online column the day before Florida voted. Fund wrote that McCain "has told conservatives he would be happy to appoint the likes of Chief Justice Roberts to the Supreme Court. But he indicated he might draw the line on a Samuel Alito because 'he wore his conservatism on his sleeve.' " In a conference call with bloggers that day, McCain said, "I don't recall a conversation where I would have said that." He was "astonished" by the Alito quote, he said, and he repeatedly says at town meetings, "We're going to have justices like Roberts and Alito."

I found what McCain could not remember: a private, informal chat with conservative Republican lawyers shortly after he announced his candidacy in April 2007. I talked to two lawyers who were present whom I have known for years and who have never misled me. One is neutral in the presidential race, and the other recently endorsed Mitt Romney. Both said they were not Fund's source, and neither knew I was talking to the other. They gave me nearly identical accounts, as follows:

"Wouldn't it be great if you get a chance to name somebody like Roberts and Alito?" one lawyer commented. McCain replied, "Well, certainly Roberts." Jaws were described as dropping. My sources cannot remember exactly what McCain said next, but their recollection is that he described Alito as too conservative.

Meanwhile, anti-tax activist Grover Norquist is worried because a prominent journalist informed him that a few years ago McCain said to him, off the record, that as president he would have to raise taxes. More recently McCain has told me, on the record, that he would never support a tax increase and, consequently, favors making the Bush tax cuts permanent.

Norquist and McCain have a stormy relationship. As chairman of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, McCain in 2005 subpoenaed records of Norquist's dealings with now-imprisoned Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Denying wrongdoing, Norquist said that McCain held a grudge against him because he campaigned against the senator's 2000 presidential bid. Norquist told me that he has no animus toward McCain and only wants assurances that McCain opposes higher taxes.

According to exit polls, voters calling themselves "very conservative" supported Romney in Florida by two to one, and McCain still won in a state described as a microcosm of America. McCain survived a scathing conservative talk-radio assault led by Rush Limbaugh. Romney's appeal to the right on immigration backfired, triggering Sen. Mel Martinez's endorsement of McCain and a five-to-one margin for him in the Cuban community.

McCain as the Republican nominee would need those "very conservative" voters. He will encounter some of them at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington Feb. 7-9. His campaign asked yesterday for McCain to be able to speak there after rejecting an invitation to last year's meeting. At CPAC, he might well consider providing "straight talk" about Samuel Alito and promising to veto any tax increase passed by a Democratic Congress.

Peace,

Dave


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.72
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.72
  • Reputation:   2,259
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted
There is also this dangerous idea that only he can defeat the Dems. However there is a strong undercurrent among the core of the party that they will stay home.

Thus the Dems will win and this is precisely why you see Progressives and Liberals so for McCain. They know that both Hillary and Obama will make mincemeat out of him.

:noidea: Thank-you for stating this.

I personally do not like Romney either because of his Mormonism. I just find it very strange that the Progressives and Liberals hate him and are scared to death of him. It makes one wonder and go HMMMMM. :thumbsup:

Hmm . . . good point.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  23
  • Topic Count:  1,294
  • Topics Per Day:  0.20
  • Content Count:  31,762
  • Content Per Day:  4.89
  • Reputation:   9,769
  • Days Won:  115
  • Joined:  09/14/2007
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

What to do??? ... :noidea: ... what to do???


  • Group:  Members
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  7
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  56
  • Content Per Day:  0.01
  • Reputation:   2
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/18/2007
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

The reporter of the dutch evening news said it was not important, because it wouldn't be valid somehow; next tuesday will be important, he said.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
      • 14 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...