-
Posts
58 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
24 NeutralProfile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Leavenworth, Ks.
-
Interests
Eschatology, Archaeology, Apologetics
Recent Profile Visitors
698 profile views
-
You do not understand how faithful the Left's adherents are. They are not brainwashed, or conned or mislead. They know who and what they support and they do so believing exactly what their leaders believe in.
-
Do you think that enforcing the country's immigration laws is a legal thing to do? Because that is what these people are actually protesting against. Trump is not a King, nor does he act like one. And I say this as someone who doesn't like the man. [Admin Edit] What they are protesting is the concept that immigration laws should be enforced and illegal aliens should be sent back to their place of origin. They are protesting against enforcing laws.
-
They do not want a way out. "Romans 1:18-22 18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools" The Liberal mindset is a dead end. Everything they support is amoral. Everything they support rewards people who display a lack of morals and want to do things the wrong way and they openly punish people who follow actual fixed values and wish to do things the right way. They are not confused. They know exactly what they are doing and they are doing it with conscience of forethought.
-
I would say that the residents are pretty much in tune with their poor government at both the state and Federal level since they stay in the state and they keep voting these same in-effective leaders into office. Newsom has shown himself to be a highly incompetent leader and also woefully ignorant of everything wrong with his state.
-
Elon Musk dismantling the Federal Government
Exegesis replied to missmuffet's topic in U.S. Politics
Did Biden And Harris have this? -
Elon Musk dismantling the Federal Government
Exegesis replied to missmuffet's topic in U.S. Politics
This is not an example that can ever be used to excuse moral failures. "Well, God still used them anyway." Yes, He did, but that does not excuse the moral failure. As for a role in government, amoral people do not make good leaders. David's one act with Bathsheba destroyed his family and lead to the eventual destruction of the kingship in Israel. -
"Trumpian" has nothing to do with it. A person who enters the country illegally is an illegal alien. A person who enters the country legally is an immigrant. A migrant is just a person who moves around. Basic English. Jesus also instructed Paul and Peter to give instructions to obey the law of the land. That would mean you do not enter someone else's territory illegally. It has nothing to do with loving one's neighbor. Progressives always try and hinge it on love when what people who believe in controlled borders want is for outsiders to not be able to arbitrarily break our laws and then get rewarded for it. What you support tells people to actively break the law. And if you also claim to be a Christian, then you support a political position that directly violates scripture.
-
divorce and remarriage cancer worse than corona
Exegesis replied to vic66's topic in General Discussion
Basic English does not seem to be your long suite. Your sentences above make no sense in their present form. The guilty party is the one who instigates the divorce, in your flawed scenario. That is biblical fact. It is also biblical fact that according to the OT law, divorce had no terms for fault. So you are also saying Jesus changed the law, which we know He did not. You also evidently don't know that the New Testament was not originally written in English. It was written in Greek. In Matthew 1:19-21, Matthew 5:31-32, Mathew 19:7-9, Mark 10:11-12, and Luke 16:16-18 most of the words translated in later translations as "divorce" are not the Greek word for divorce. They are the Greek word for "putting away" which means a man getting rid of his wife without giving her a certificate of divorce. That is what Jesus was condemning and calling adultery, not divorce itself. A person marrying an un-divorced woman was committing adultery. Pretty simple concept.- 185 replies
-
- divorce and remarriage
- separation
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
I certainly do not need a prophecy page from this board when I have the Bible. I've been studying prophecy for 50 years. Seems you have a problem answering simple questions. And spell check is your friend.
-
Paul Taught to Keep the Ten Commandments
Exegesis replied to Jedi4Yahweh's topic in General Discussion
"why we should ignore it." Your words. If you know you are doing this, keeping this commandment, why is it so difficult for you to explain how you are keeping it? Surely it should be the easiest thing for you to explain, and since you think everyone else should be doing it, you would be anxious to explain it to anyone who asked. Right? You can avoid the question by saying you've never told anyone else they need to keep the Sabbath, but your posts say something else. Like this earlier one: Come on. Take a chance. Tell everyone here on this board how you keep the Sabbath. It can't be that hard. -
Paul Taught to Keep the Ten Commandments
Exegesis replied to Jedi4Yahweh's topic in General Discussion
Words, words, and more words. It ALWAYS boils down to those who say we must keep the Sabbath, but can never explain how we are supposed to keep it. Go out on a limb. Be the first, on this board or any other Christian forum out there, and actually tell people exactly how you keep the Sabbath. Without doing so, your constant assertions that you do keep it are nothing but empty words. You are a self-proclaimed Sabbath-keeper. Let's match your explanation of how you keep the Sabbath with what the Bible says are requirements to keep it and see if they match up. Is that too difficult? -
Paul Taught to Keep the Ten Commandments
Exegesis replied to Jedi4Yahweh's topic in General Discussion
In other words, you cannot explain to anyone how you keep the Sabbath, even though you have been one of those on this board who continually tells others they have to keep it. But you won't explain to them how to do so. I find nowhere in this thread where I have "dissed" the Sabbath. Perhaps you could point me to a specific post where I have done so. I am openly questioning a flawed rational that people such as you use in regards to this commandment. Telling people they must do something, but, at the same time, steadfastly refusing to tell them exactly how they should do it. In regards to spiritual matters, when you take it upon yourself to tell someone they have to do something you claim God commands them to do, at the same time, you have to be able to explain to them how they must keep that command, in any detail they ask you to explain. You cannot just divorce yourself from your responsibility to explain something to people after you have told them they have to do something. Why is this question so difficult for you to answer? If you are so confident that you are keeping this commandment, then it should be patently easy for you to explain to other people exactly how you keep it. Why the constant avoidance of an actual explanation? -
Paul Taught to Keep the Ten Commandments
Exegesis replied to Jedi4Yahweh's topic in General Discussion
When you place your salvation on a work, i.e. the Sabbath, you cannot claim Christ's sacrifice on the cross. Using a rather unique spelling of Jesus' name gets you no points either. If Jesus' sacrifice on the cross delivered us from our sins completely, why would we need to observe a certain day of the old covenant when you are telling me all of that covenant is done with, except for a day? I will ask again, because you still have not answered the question: How are you keeping the Sabbath? Explain it to me. In terms an unbelieving secularist could understand, as if I just walked up to you off the street with no spiritual or biblical knowledge at all . . . In the post above you plainly say you are keeping the Sabbath, so explain to all of us here exactly how you are doing that, in 2020. Surely, since you are telling all of us that we need to do it, you can explain to us, in great detail, exactly how you, yourself, are keeping the Sabbath. I will also add that you have absolutely no idea of my position on the Sabbath yet, but you call me disobedient, because I question you on your methodology. You have made a clear claim. I am waiting for you to explain to us exactly how you keep that claim, biblically. So far, you have not answered the question. -
Paul Taught to Keep the Ten Commandments
Exegesis replied to Jedi4Yahweh's topic in General Discussion
Not a satisfactory answer. I asked you a specific question, and you gave me the same tired reply every so-called Sabbath keeper gives me. I ask again: How are you keeping the Sabbath? Because unless you are offering a sacrifice at the Temple every Sabbath as well as all the other daily and Festival Sabbaths, you are not keeping the Sabbath. Explain to me how you are keeping the Sabbath without a Temple, the Levitcal Priesthood and the daily sacrifices.