Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest Butero
Posted
That did not address my question.

It is not hypocritical of the anti-abortionists to murder abortion doctors?

Of course it is.

And if that anti-abortionist calls himself a christian, just imagine what that does to the name God.

How many stumbling blocks do you suppose were thrown out because of that one stupid act?

Moses was in Egypt at a time when the Jewish people were in bondage. There was an injustice taking place against his people, but it was the law of the land. He wound up killing an Egyptian to defend one of his own people. Was Moses hypocritcal? How many stumblingblocks do you suppose were thrown out because of that one stupid act? :noidea: You can say what you will, but this is not a simple act of murder like you are making out. The people that usually commit these acts do so to save innocent lives.

The Dr. wasn't about to perform an abortion. Big difference.

Please, do not try and compare Moses with the guy who shot the Dr.

And as for saving lives, the people who were scheduled to see the murdered Dr. will more than likely just change Dr.s.

And yes, it is a simple act of murder.

Boy that is some difference! The doctor wasn't "about to perform an abortion." If that is really your objection, then how about if the man waited at the clinic with a gun, and pleaded with the doctor not to kill anymore children, and the doctor refused to listen? Would it be ok to shoot him in that instance?

The fact is, the doctor had killed, and was going to kill again, so my point is valid. And I have heard of many instances where after something like this occurs, many of the children that were scheduled to be killed survived. In case you didn't read the story, this was the only doctor in the state that did this procedure, so many of the future victims were likely saved.

Your point is valid, but only in your own mind. The murder of one abortion doctor is not going to change anything, and you're wrong to think that violence is always the answer. Bullets are demonstrably poor witnessing techniques, but then again happiness is a warm gun.

I never said violence is always the answer. If you bothered to read what I wrote, I made it clear I don't think that man should have shot the doctor. My point isn't that he was right in his actions, but that his actions were less reprehensible than that of the man he killed.

By whose standards? God or man?

Maybe you should ask God that question Gauntlet? I think it is common sense that killing a murderer to save his victim is differen't than being a gun for hire.

  • Replies 195
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  1,285
  • Topics Per Day:  0.15
  • Content Count:  17,917
  • Content Per Day:  2.16
  • Reputation:   355
  • Days Won:  19
  • Joined:  10/01/2002
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Re


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  1,285
  • Topics Per Day:  0.15
  • Content Count:  17,917
  • Content Per Day:  2.16
  • Reputation:   355
  • Days Won:  19
  • Joined:  10/01/2002
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Re

  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  66
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  6,363
  • Content Per Day:  1.05
  • Reputation:   119
  • Days Won:  9
  • Joined:  11/07/2008
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

I don't think anyone can guess and even justify the actions of the man who murdered the abortion doctor. He is wrong and he is trying to usurp the job of God. To say that this guy was some kind of knight in shining armor saving unborn lives is ridiculous. God will ultimately judge all those who murder - anyone.


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  7
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  788
  • Content Per Day:  0.13
  • Reputation:   4
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/18/2009
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/18/1979

Posted
It is up to God to judge all those who murder - the born and the unborn. If we support murder, I think we are as guilty as those who perform the act.

:noidea:

Taking up for the abortion clinic doctor is supporting a man who commits murder, so using that standard, that means you are as guilty as the doctor. You need to be careful before you are so hasty in saying things like that and agreeing with it.

If the abortion doctor had been armed at the time of the shooting, would it have made a difference? Shooting an unarmed man is always represensible according to the cowboy code. And if a gunfight had ensued, would the two parties have taken it outside so as not to spill blood on holy ground? If this is not the cowboy mentality, I don't know what is.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.72
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.73
  • Reputation:   2,259
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted
Romans 12:19

Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.

(KJV)

And Jesus said, "He who lives by the sword shall die by the sword."

**Note: I'm not saying the man who murdered the doctor was "in God's will" - but you should consider this as well.

Guest Butero
Posted
It is up to God to judge all those who murder - the born and the unborn. If we support murder, I think we are as guilty as those who perform the act.

:noidea:

Taking up for the abortion clinic doctor is supporting a man who commits murder, so using that standard, that means you are as guilty as the doctor. You need to be careful before you are so hasty in saying things like that and agreeing with it.

If the abortion doctor had been armed at the time of the shooting, would it have made a difference? Shooting an unarmed man is always represensible according to the cowboy code. And if a gunfight had ensued, would the two parties have taken it outside so as not to spill blood on holy ground? If this is not the cowboy mentality, I don't know what is.

How about sucking the brains out of a defenseless baby Gauntlet? How does that stack up in the "cowboy code?" :wub:

Posted
Romans 12:19

Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.

(KJV)

Nobody is arguing against that scripture Gauntlet, but it really doesn't apply. In all likelihood, the man didn't shoot the doctor to get even with him. He probably shot him to save innocent lives. Vengeance would mean he just wanted to kill him to avenge the babies he had already slaughtered, and that is doubtful.

To use your own words....

You have no way of knowing that....

  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  7
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  788
  • Content Per Day:  0.13
  • Reputation:   4
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/18/2009
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/18/1979

Posted
That did not address my question.

It is not hypocritical of the anti-abortionists to murder abortion doctors?

Of course it is.

And if that anti-abortionist calls himself a christian, just imagine what that does to the name God.

How many stumbling blocks do you suppose were thrown out because of that one stupid act?

Moses was in Egypt at a time when the Jewish people were in bondage. There was an injustice taking place against his people, but it was the law of the land. He wound up killing an Egyptian to defend one of his own people. Was Moses hypocritcal? How many stumblingblocks do you suppose were thrown out because of that one stupid act? :noidea: You can say what you will, but this is not a simple act of murder like you are making out. The people that usually commit these acts do so to save innocent lives.

The Dr. wasn't about to perform an abortion. Big difference.

Please, do not try and compare Moses with the guy who shot the Dr.

And as for saving lives, the people who were scheduled to see the murdered Dr. will more than likely just change Dr.s.

And yes, it is a simple act of murder.

Boy that is some difference! The doctor wasn't "about to perform an abortion." If that is really your objection, then how about if the man waited at the clinic with a gun, and pleaded with the doctor not to kill anymore children, and the doctor refused to listen? Would it be ok to shoot him in that instance?

The fact is, the doctor had killed, and was going to kill again, so my point is valid. And I have heard of many instances where after something like this occurs, many of the children that were scheduled to be killed survived. In case you didn't read the story, this was the only doctor in the state that did this procedure, so many of the future victims were likely saved.

Your point is valid, but only in your own mind. The murder of one abortion doctor is not going to change anything, and you're wrong to think that violence is always the answer. Bullets are demonstrably poor witnessing techniques, but then again happiness is a warm gun.

I never said violence is always the answer. If you bothered to read what I wrote, I made it clear I don't think that man should have shot the doctor. My point isn't that he was right in his actions, but that his actions were less reprehensible than that of the man he killed.

By whose standards? God or man?

Maybe you should ask God that question Gauntlet? I think it is common sense that killing a murderer to save his victim is differen't than being a gun for hire.

Perhaps, but was their a victim in clear and present danger at the time of the murder? Was Tiller in the act of aborting a fetus when the church vigilante shot him?

Posted
Romans 12:19

Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.

(KJV)

And Jesus said, "He who lives by the sword shall die by the sword."

**Note: I'm not saying the man who murdered the doctor was "in God's will" - but you should consider this as well.

You're not saying God used that guy to kill that Dr....................are you?

Or that it's even a possibility?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...