other one Posted July 6, 2011 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 599 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,254 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,984 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted July 6, 2011 I believe the grandfather was involved somehow. I taped and watched ALL the testimony. George Anthony made my skin crawl. I would agree. I wouldn't be surprised if the story we heard from the defense about him molesting Casey was ot true, for several different phychologists I've heard says that she displayed the kind of behavior that an abused person would have. It's obvious if you watched the trial that Casey has some reall problems mentally. I don't know what's behind them, nor do I know if she killed her daughter or not. but I did watch enough of the trial to understand why the jury found her not guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladypeartree Posted July 6, 2011 Group: Royal Member Followers: 37 Topic Count: 542 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 33,024 Content Per Day: 5.05 Reputation: 23,838 Days Won: 236 Joined: 06/21/2006 Status: Online Birthday: 02/23/1953 Share Posted July 6, 2011 I am not in America so I have no idea about this case at all but please before you all condem someone stop and think ... here in the Uk we had a trial of a woman accused of murdering three of her babies ..she served 11 years in jail and was denied the chance to have any more children as she was too old by the time she was released and her husband had left her and remarried. Two years after she was released ( and had to leave her home town and family for fear of attack ) new evidence was found thanks to more sophisticated dna abilities and the testomony of several doctors who managed to get the medical records of the prosecuters medical " expert" re-examined to prove that what she had claimed all along was right ..... the children had all suffered from a rare genetic condition and they had died as a result if that and NOT because she had murdered them even though the bodies were covered in bruises and had lots of small fractures ... all part of the disease. I am NOT saying this is the case here but if there is any doubt at all should we as Christians be condemming her ???? I woud sooner pray for her as it sounds as if she is very much in need of prayer and help Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LadyC Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 I think it is very conspicous that the father of the little girl has never been identified nor was questioned? Who is the father of Kaylee?? Why didn't he take the stand? I think both grandparents are somehow involved. a couple of years ago greta interviewed cindy in their home. at that time it was said that caylee's biological father had never been informed... that the pregnancy had resulted from a brief fling with a 'friend'. of course, nobody in that family seems capable of telling the truth about anything, so who knows. as for the grandparents involvement, i think they certainly know more than they let on, and are at least guilty of covering stuff up. JMO. i'm not sure i buy the whole 'george molested casey' bit. seems that little piece of info ONLY came up to throw everything off during the trial. until a few weeks ago, nobody had ever heard of such, nor had it ever even been considered. now suddenly people everywhere think it was true. EVEN if it were true, it should NOT excuse her actions. I am not in America so I have no idea about this case at all but please before you all condem someone stop and think ... here in the Uk we had a trial of a woman accused of murdering three of her babies ..she served 11 years in jail and was denied the chance to have any more children as she was too old by the time she was released and her husband had left her and remarried. Two years after she was released ( and had to leave her home town and family for fear of attack ) new evidence was found thanks to more sophisticated dna abilities and the testomony of several doctors who managed to get the medical records of the prosecuters medical " expert" re-examined to prove that what she had claimed all along was right ..... the children had all suffered from a rare genetic condition and they had died as a result if that and NOT because she had murdered them even though the bodies were covered in bruises and had lots of small fractures ... all part of the disease. I am NOT saying this is the case here but if there is any doubt at all should we as Christians be condemming her ???? I woud sooner pray for her as it sounds as if she is very much in need of prayer and help i hear what you're saying. there is a woman on death row in texas, who has been there for about a dozen years, convicted of murdering her children. i absolutely believe in that woman's innocense. a lot of people disagree with me, even here on this forum, but i followed that case and the trial like i was there. i have no idea how anyone thought there wasn't enough reasonable doubt. heck, i didn't think there was reasonable PROOF! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fez Posted July 6, 2011 Group: Royal Member Followers: 3 Topic Count: 683 Topics Per Day: 0.12 Content Count: 11,128 Content Per Day: 1.99 Reputation: 1,352 Days Won: 54 Joined: 02/03/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/07/1952 Share Posted July 6, 2011 She was judged by man and found not guilty. It does no good to re-judge her over and over. Let God render the final judgment to her or whoever else was involved in this tragic mess. He will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other one Posted July 6, 2011 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 599 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,254 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,984 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted July 6, 2011 Unless whoever is guilty repents and asks for forgiveness, then all this is completely beside the point..... I don't think I ever killed anyone, but I have sins I don't want God to deal with come judgement day, and I hope those have been forgotten Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nebula Posted July 6, 2011 Group: Royal Member Followers: 10 Topic Count: 5,823 Topics Per Day: 0.75 Content Count: 45,870 Content Per Day: 5.94 Reputation: 1,897 Days Won: 83 Joined: 03/22/2003 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/19/1970 Share Posted July 6, 2011 I haven't been following this - call it a boycott if you will of making entertainment and "news" out of court cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nebula Posted July 6, 2011 Group: Royal Member Followers: 10 Topic Count: 5,823 Topics Per Day: 0.75 Content Count: 45,870 Content Per Day: 5.94 Reputation: 1,897 Days Won: 83 Joined: 03/22/2003 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/19/1970 Share Posted July 6, 2011 We have a lot of reflecting to do, if our children are forsaken, so is our future. 4 million babies a year are a testament to that. Killing born children is only a step away form killing the unborn children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted July 6, 2011 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.09 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted July 6, 2011 a couple of years ago greta interviewed cindy in their home. at that time it was said that caylee's biological father had never been informed... that the pregnancy had resulted from a brief fling with a 'friend'. of course, nobody in that family seems capable of telling the truth about anything, so who knows. as for the grandparents involvement, i think they certainly know more than they let on, and are at least guilty of covering stuff up. JMO. i'm not sure i buy the whole 'george molested casey' bit. seems that little piece of info ONLY came up to throw everything off during the trial. until a few weeks ago, nobody had ever heard of such, nor had it ever even been considered. now suddenly people everywhere think it was true. EVEN if it were true, it should NOT excuse her actions. I'm not too sure that the molestation and the 'who is Caylee's father?' thing is a recent phenomenum; the FBI did DNA tests on Casey's father and brother two years ago to determine if either of them was Caylee's father. If no one had ever heard of the molestation claims in 2009 why were these tests conducted? This information came out during the trial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nebula Posted July 6, 2011 Group: Royal Member Followers: 10 Topic Count: 5,823 Topics Per Day: 0.75 Content Count: 45,870 Content Per Day: 5.94 Reputation: 1,897 Days Won: 83 Joined: 03/22/2003 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/19/1970 Share Posted July 6, 2011 OK, I read a report with this claim: However, one alternate juror, who talked to the media by telephone, said the verdict was based on the evidence presented in court. "From what we understand with the testimony, it was such a horrific accident they didn't know how to deal with it," juror Russell Huekler explained. "The family appeared to be very dysfunctional, and instead of admitting, 'Look, there was an accident,' they chose to hide it for whatever reason," he said. "The prosecution did not present the evidence that showed that, you know, that Caylee had been murdered. They did not show a motive," Heukler added. For those who have been keeping up with the trial, how plausible do you suppose this to be? Oh, and as a final note: After the verdict, Anthony's defense team told reporters there were no winners in this case. They blasted the media for fueling public anger. Opinions? Source Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nebula Posted July 6, 2011 Group: Royal Member Followers: 10 Topic Count: 5,823 Topics Per Day: 0.75 Content Count: 45,870 Content Per Day: 5.94 Reputation: 1,897 Days Won: 83 Joined: 03/22/2003 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/19/1970 Share Posted July 6, 2011 Here's another take Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts