Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  683
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  11,128
  • Content Per Day:  1.86
  • Reputation:   1,352
  • Days Won:  54
  • Joined:  02/03/2009
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/07/1952

Posted

Its nice that Ignatius understands this the way the Roman Catholicism does. I'm comfortable trusting in what scripture actually says though.

You deny what scripture says.

Ignatius learned the gospel from John.

John quoted Jesus as saying:

53 Jesus said to them, “Very truly I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. 54 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day. 55 For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink.

Ignatius said this regarding the gnostics(protestants of the time):

"They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they confess not the Eucharist to be the flesh of our Saviour Jesus Christ, which suffered for our sins, and which the Father, of His goodness, raised up again." Ignatius of Antioch, Epistle to Smyrnaeans, 7,1 (c. A.D. 110).

Here's what Paul said:

1 Cor 11

27 So then, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord. 28 Everyone ought to examine themselves before they eat of the bread and drink from the cup. 29 For those who eat and drink without discerning the body of Christ eat and drink judgment on themselves.

And finally, here's what Martin Luther said:

"Who, but the devil, has granted such license of wresting the words of the holy Scripture? Who ever read in the Scriptures, that my body is the same as the sign of my body? or, that is is the same as it signifies? What language in the world ever spoke so? It is only then the devil, that imposes upon us by these fanatical men. Not one of the Fathers of the Church, though so numerous, ever spoke as the Sacramentarians: not one of them ever said, It is only bread and wine; or, the body and blood of Christ is not there present.

Surely, it is not credible, nor possible, since they often speak, and repeat their sentiments, that they should never (if they thought so) not so much as once, say, or let slip these words: It is bread only; or the body of Christ is not there, especially it being of great importance, that men should not be deceived. Certainly, in so many Fathers, and in so many writings, the negative might at least be found in one of them, had they thought the body and blood of Christ were not really present: but they are all of them unanimous.”

–Luther’s Collected Works, Wittenburg Edition, no. 7 p, 391

Yep, Luther was a real fan of the Catholic Church!

You are missing the point, of course.

The denial of the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist is inconsistent with Christianity. Even Luther knew this.

Actually I have studied Luther, and many others quite a bit, and always go back to Luther.

“All we who believe on Christ are kings and priests in Christ.”

Concerning Christian Liberty - Martin Luther

I just wondered why you would quote from someone who called the Pope the Antichrist is all...


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  438
  • Topics Per Day:  0.07
  • Content Count:  2,947
  • Content Per Day:  0.50
  • Reputation:   301
  • Days Won:  9
  • Joined:  04/28/2009
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/18/1949

Posted

Dragoon

Unfortunately, Catholics also assign far too much weight to tradition, which is where you get a lot of the false teachings within the RCC.

I've read quite a few writings by 'early Christians', and on the whole I find their writings in accord with what I believe. Where they differ from scripture, which do you lean towards? Do you place man before God's Word, or God's Word above all?

For myself, I weigh men's thoughts by scripture, not scripture by man's wisdom.

Amen! - God's Word is the Authority and the measurement of all TRUTH.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  37
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  913
  • Content Per Day:  0.15
  • Reputation:   19
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  03/29/2008
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/02/1969

Posted

I watched Pink Floyd's old movie The Wall the other night.

Say what you like about it (I love their music), a couple of lines from one song spring to mind....

Not scriptural in any way, but pertinant to this thread....

"We don't need no education, we don't need no thought control"

"All and all it's just another brick in the Wall"

My point being, I don't need no mans writing, I don't need no mans doctrine.

All in all that just builds a wall between truth and the true Jesus.

I just need Jesus.

Heretic!!!

All true Christians like the Eagles better!

:b:

There was some great music that came out of the early 80s though.

Mark me down as being in the true Christians group........ the Eagles Rock.... Second Begees...

I guess I'm a fence stradler, I like them both

:thumbsup:


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.72
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.72
  • Reputation:   2,259
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted

I was raised in a Lutheran church, and they never taught the bread and wine to be the physical body and blood of Jesus.


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  4
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  378
  • Content Per Day:  0.06
  • Reputation:   10
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  12/21/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  10/18/1965

Posted

Its nice that Ignatius understands this the way the Roman Catholicism does. I'm comfortable trusting in what scripture actually says though.

You deny what scripture says.

Ignatius learned the gospel from John.

John quoted Jesus as saying:

53 Jesus said to them, “Very truly I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. 54 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day. 55 For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink.

Ignatius said this regarding the gnostics(protestants of the time):

"They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they confess not the Eucharist to be the flesh of our Saviour Jesus Christ, which suffered for our sins, and which the Father, of His goodness, raised up again." Ignatius of Antioch, Epistle to Smyrnaeans, 7,1 (c. A.D. 110).

Here's what Paul said:

1 Cor 11

27 So then, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord. 28 Everyone ought to examine themselves before they eat of the bread and drink from the cup. 29 For those who eat and drink without discerning the body of Christ eat and drink judgment on themselves.

And finally, here's what Martin Luther said:

"Who, but the devil, has granted such license of wresting the words of the holy Scripture? Who ever read in the Scriptures, that my body is the same as the sign of my body? or, that is is the same as it signifies? What language in the world ever spoke so? It is only then the devil, that imposes upon us by these fanatical men. Not one of the Fathers of the Church, though so numerous, ever spoke as the Sacramentarians: not one of them ever said, It is only bread and wine; or, the body and blood of Christ is not there present.

Surely, it is not credible, nor possible, since they often speak, and repeat their sentiments, that they should never (if they thought so) not so much as once, say, or let slip these words: It is bread only; or the body of Christ is not there, especially it being of great importance, that men should not be deceived. Certainly, in so many Fathers, and in so many writings, the negative might at least be found in one of them, had they thought the body and blood of Christ were not really present: but they are all of them unanimous.”

–Luther’s Collected Works, Wittenburg Edition, no. 7 p, 391

Gnostics are not protestants you deceptive git ;)

I posted scripture that contradicts your views and that of the Roman Catholic church. I suggest you deal with that before you accuse others of denying scripture.

You quote 1 Cor 11:27-29. You leave out verses 30-31, which add clarity to this passage.

That is why many among you are weak and sick, and a number of you have fallen asleep. But if we were more discerning with regard to ourselves, we would not come under such judgment. (1 Cor 11:30-31)

The passage you quote clearly refers to the 'bread and drink', demonstrating that that is what they are... bread and drink. It even discusses getting drunk from it, which one does not become from blood! Here in verse 31, it elaborates on the 'discernment' mentioned in verse 29. When we eat and drink the Lord's Supper in an unworthy manner (which is discussed in verses 17-22 and 33-34), we drink judgement upon ourselves because we do this in remembrance of Christ... which is what 1 Corinthians says twice in verses 24 and 26.

You still seem to think that posting the views of men trump what scripture says.

It doesn't matter whether it is St Thomas Aquinas, Martin Luthor or Billy Graham. These are all men. All men are fallible... even those who were taught by John.

It may surprise you, but Martin Luthor is not my God.

------

I've asked you several questions which you've ignored. Please allow me to repost some of them.

1) When the curtain in the temple was torn in two at Jesus' crucifixion, what do you think that signified?

2) Where men's views differ from scripture, which do you lean towards? Do you place man before God's Word, or God's Word above all?

3) Do these responses actually matter to you, or do you simply jump to your next point of argument?

4) Do you care about who God truly is, or are you committed to the Roman Catholic Church despite any scripture or logic?


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  4
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  378
  • Content Per Day:  0.06
  • Reputation:   10
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  12/21/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  10/18/1965

Posted

The Catholic church was the first christian business. Big money in false idols and graven images

Those are empty words.

Study the early Christians and you will find the Catholic Church.

That's too bad.

When I read about the early church, I'm looking to find God.


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  4
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  378
  • Content Per Day:  0.06
  • Reputation:   10
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  12/21/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  10/18/1965

Posted

I watched Pink Floyd's old movie The Wall the other night.

Say what you like about it (I love their music), a couple of lines from one song spring to mind....

Not scriptural in any way, but pertinant to this thread....

"We don't need no education, we don't need no thought control"

"All and all it's just another brick in the Wall"

My point being, I don't need no mans writing, I don't need no mans doctrine.

All in all that just builds a wall between truth and the true Jesus.

I just need Jesus.

Heretic!!!

All true Christians like the Eagles better!

:b:

There was some great music that came out of the early 80s though.

Mark me down as being in the true Christians group........ the Eagles Rock.... Second Begees...

I guess I'm a fence stradler, I like them both

:thumbsup:

I grew up on "old time rock'n'roll", but early 80s saw me getting into a lot of New Wave and Alternative. While I still love the Eagles and Floyd, when I think of the 80s I think more of Depeche Mode and the Smiths.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.72
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.72
  • Reputation:   2,259
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted

I watched Pink Floyd's old movie The Wall the other night.

Heretic!!!

All true Christians like the Eagles better!

:b:

There was some great music that came out of the early 80s though.

Mark me down as being in the true Christians group........ the Eagles Rock.... Second Begees...

I guess I'm a fence stradler, I like them both

:thumbsup:

I grew up on "old time rock'n'roll", but early 80s saw me getting into a lot of New Wave and Alternative. While I still love the Eagles and Floyd, when I think of the 80s I think more of Depeche Mode and the Smiths.

"Why should the devil have all the good music?"

You all should listen to Randy Stonehill, classic Petra, Phil Keaggy, and the like.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.72
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.72
  • Reputation:   2,259
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted

Randy Stonehill had one good album then got steadily flakier. I prefer Larry Norman.

Phil Keaggy is an incredible guitar player but he usually has about 1 good song per album. I like several newer bands better than any of these, including the Newsboys, Brandon Heath, and Matt Mahrer.

What do you think if these guys?

I was trying to bring up bands and musicians from their era.

I was an 80's teen, so the 80's Christian music is still my favorite.

The ones you mentioned are good (although I'm still getting used to "the Newsboys" not having an Aussie accent!). Of the newest artists, I've gotten into Misty Edwards, Rick Pino, Jesus Culture and the like more than the mainstream Christian artists.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  37
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  913
  • Content Per Day:  0.15
  • Reputation:   19
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  03/29/2008
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/02/1969

Posted

Randy Stonehill had one good album then got steadily flakier. I prefer Larry Norman.

Phil Keaggy is an incredible guitar player but he usually has about 1 good song per album. I like several newer bands better than any of these, including the Newsboys, Brandon Heath, and Matt Mahrer.

What do you think if these guys?

I was trying to bring up bands and musicians from their era.

I was an 80's teen, so the 80's Christian music is still my favorite.

The ones you mentioned are good (although I'm still getting used to "the Newsboys" not having an Aussie accent!). Of the newest artists, I've gotten into Misty Edwards, Rick Pino, Jesus Culture and the like more than the mainstream Christian artists.

I do like Petra, the Newsboys, Steven Curtis Chapman, MercyMe

But some of my favs. are Kirk Franklin, and for awesome worship, Karen Wheaton

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Brilliant!
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...