The_Patriot21 Posted February 3, 2013 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 28 Topic Count: 338 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 15,707 Content Per Day: 2.46 Reputation: 8,523 Days Won: 39 Joined: 10/25/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/27/1985 Share Posted February 3, 2013 only if we do it matt. When the government does it, its "taking care of the poor" In this case, I guess that would make Obama a modern day robin hood. We should put him in tights and give him a bow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthitjah Posted February 3, 2013 Group: Royal Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 1,285 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 17,917 Content Per Day: 2.27 Reputation: 355 Days Won: 19 Joined: 10/01/2002 Status: Offline Share Posted February 3, 2013 only if we do it matt. When the government does it, its "taking care of the poor" In this case, I guess that would make Obama a modern day robin hood. We should put him in tights and give him a bow. I agree. There's a common misconceptiuon on Robin hood though. It was the Government who Robin Hood was taking from and returning it to the common people. Obama's got it backwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Patriot21 Posted February 3, 2013 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 28 Topic Count: 338 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 15,707 Content Per Day: 2.46 Reputation: 8,523 Days Won: 39 Joined: 10/25/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/27/1985 Share Posted February 3, 2013 I agree. totally. Though, I would still like to see him in tights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other one Posted February 4, 2013 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 596 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,088 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,833 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted February 4, 2013 then they will take wealth from those of us who really can afford it to pay for those who can't...... ...... and this is commonly called theft. Theft is when you do that illegally. Unfortunately they passed laws through people we elected into office to do so legally...... we both may and do disagree with it, but it is not theft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Patriot21 Posted February 4, 2013 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 28 Topic Count: 338 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 15,707 Content Per Day: 2.46 Reputation: 8,523 Days Won: 39 Joined: 10/25/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/27/1985 Share Posted February 4, 2013 I disagree with that. The government, may define the law, but it doesnt define, right and wrong, the Bible defines right and wrong. Thou shalt not steal, is in the Bible. That is theft. If the government says its legal, it may be legal theft, but its still wrong, and still theft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other one Posted February 4, 2013 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 596 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,088 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,833 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted February 4, 2013 about half the population would disagree that it's wrong. Actually those same people would think it is wrong because I don't need a job to live a decent life. Go figure....... we all have our own definitions of what's right and wrong, The Bible tells me to give to the governing authority what is theirs. So who gets to decide what's theirs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthitjah Posted February 4, 2013 Group: Royal Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 1,285 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 17,917 Content Per Day: 2.27 Reputation: 355 Days Won: 19 Joined: 10/01/2002 Status: Offline Share Posted February 4, 2013 then they will take wealth from those of us who really can afford it to pay for those who can't...... ...... and this is commonly called theft. Theft is when you do that illegally. Unfortunately they passed laws through people we elected into office to do so legally...... we both may and do disagree with it, but it is not theft No, actually, it is Theft! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SavedByGrace1981 Posted February 4, 2013 Group: Royal Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 104 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 2,923 Content Per Day: 0.61 Reputation: 462 Days Won: 2 Joined: 04/02/2011 Status: Offline Birthday: 03/22/1953 Share Posted February 4, 2013 I really do believe we will see some kind of armed resistance or major physical disruptions in this Nation within the next 4 years as people just get completely fed up. One thing we are not here in the U.S. is a bunch of Socialist's. it's not our nature. At least half of us that is. We were born and steeped in Independence. We won't go silently into losing our personal Liberty. Not to worry, though. The Obamas, Reids, McCains, Pelosi's, the rest of the ruling class, and the Hollywood elites either have taxpayer paid for armed security, or they live in gated communities. It's good to know our "superiors" and the beautiful people won't be affected by the riots that are surely coming. {sarcasm INTENDED} Blessings! -Ed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amor Posted February 5, 2013 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 1 Topic Count: 13 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 2,194 Content Per Day: 0.30 Reputation: 34 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/18/2004 Status: Offline Share Posted February 5, 2013 I really do believe we will see some kind of armed resistance or major physical disruptions in this Nation within the next 4 years as people just get completely fed up. One thing we are not here in the U.S. is a bunch of Socialist's. it's not our nature. At least half of us that is. We were born and steeped in Independence. We won't go silently into losing our personal Liberty. What moral justification would there be to take up arms, presumably trying to kill or maim government employees, just to protest against the healthcare policies, discussed in depth before his election, of a Democratically elected President? T If you want to change policies why can't you try and do so using the political structure available and if you can't convince a majority accept the reality. Why wouldn't such attacks be classed as terrorism? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amor Posted February 5, 2013 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 1 Topic Count: 13 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 2,194 Content Per Day: 0.30 Reputation: 34 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/18/2004 Status: Offline Share Posted February 5, 2013 I disagree with that. The government, may define the law, but it doesnt define, right and wrong, the Bible defines right and wrong. Thou shalt not steal, is in the Bible. That is theft. If the government says its legal, it may be legal theft, but its still wrong, and still theft. These are Jesus' words on paying taxes to the secular authorities 15 Then the Pharisees went and plotted to entrap him in what he said. 16 So they sent their disciples to him, along with the Herodians, saying, “Teacher, we know that you are sincere, and teach the way of God in accordance with truth, and show deference to no one; for you do not regard people with partiality. 17 Tell us, then, what you think. Is it lawful to pay taxes to the emperor, or not?” 18 But Jesus, aware of their malice, said, “Why are you putting me to the test, you hypocrites? 19 Show me the coin used for the tax.” And they brought him a denarius. 20 Then he said to them, “Whose head is this, and whose title?” 21 They answered, “The emperor’s.” Then he said to them, “Give therefore to the emperor the things that are the emperor’s, and to God the things that are God’s.” 22 When they heard this, they were amazed; and they left him and went away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts