Ferguson MI braces for Grand Jury decision

[Burning_Ember]

 

 

The outside protesters who are being bussed into Ferguson, MO apparently have strong ties to Islamic terrorism 

 

These protesters have their own agenda that has nothing material to do with the death of Michael Brown. These groups are anti-law enforcement and his death is being exploited to that end.  

 

This connection is largely ignored by the liberal media.

That is because the "liberal media" has to do fact checking to make sure the story they are running is reliable. Virtually every news agency is there doing research, talking to people, taking photos, taking notes, doing fact checking, they probably have better things to write about than some garbage what guy on youtube with a bad green screen and stock intro audio from iMovie is talking about. They are actual journalists, actually in St Louis, doing actual research, talking to actual people, at actual protests, instead of regurgitating a bunch of stuff they managed to google that supports their beliefs. 

 

 

 

The liberal media also buries stories that do not meet their agenda. That was easily seen in the first election that obama won in which negative stories about who he was (Im not talking about the birth certificate but legitimate stories) were buried or not reported. 

 

It is clear that islamic terrorist groups are interested in events in ferguson tho. You can find that info in any mainstream media such as the washington post.

 

If you're publishing an article about the events in Ferguson and St Louis, there are a lot of things a journalist keeps in mind. These may be a few.

 

They may have to crank out several smaller stories a day especially if they work for a newspaper. Following up on multiple leads, going and talking to people, is a lot of work. You can't just do that on the phone for the most part. You have to go to places where things are happening. What is the most important thing happening? Is it especially current? Is it relevant to the current situation? Do you have multiple reliable sources? Do you need to write AND do you need a photographer around? Is this OK'd by the paper? Do you need to pitch it to a paper? Do you need to dig for an inordinate amount of time to find out whether there is something good, or is this just a waste of time because there isn't a lot to support it? Do you have at least two sources closer to the action that can actually prove this? Do you have solid evidence or is it some guy who says he thinks this is happening? If it's happening, can you actually talk to people involved in this, get a source from inside this Organiation? (For example, leader of a KKK faction stated they were going to shoot protesters. That's a proper source. Someone saying that the KKK could do this is less reliable. Saying that some guy is part of some Muslim Organization which has connections to these guys and once another guy was charged with something so circumstantially this my be evidence that not everybody in the organization has a criminal record... Like, what they guy was doing in the youtube video, that's a lot of guilt by association, which isn't solid at all.) If it is actually happening, can you prove it? Is this fair or am I spinning this? Am I inserting my own opinion into this story somehow? Is it ethical to try pursue this story? Am I being a huge dingus to people I am interviewing for this?

 

Stories about protests happening that happen on an almost daily basis are current, people can be interviewed at these places for good sources, good photos accompany these stories which get them higher up in the paper. For example, one protest today in St Louis was covered by several local news channels, newspapers, and at least one newswire. 

 

Finding evidence of a secret Muslim Conspiracy is a lot of hard work that is unlikely to pay, or have proper evidence be found for it, if at all. That could be weeks worth of digging to get one quality article with actual evidence and sources behind it, if anything could to proven or be able to ethically run a professional level article about it. The fact that there are ongoing acts of well organized non-violent civil disobedience with several groups co-operating that was announced just the night before, something that shuts down traffic... That's something to write about.

 

Journalism isn't just a romantic profession of finding hidden secret stories that nobody else wants to talk about it, or uncovering corruption, it's not that the majority of the media buries stories that they don't like... It's a job you need to get paid for. It has many different kinds of ethical standards. I've been digging very hard regarding Ferguson/St. Louis and there is too much to cover in the first place that is properly sourced and proven, let alone some kind of Islamic Connection which I really haven't been able to find anything solid about.

[ayin jade]

Journalism isn't just a romantic profession of finding hidden secret stories that nobody else wants to talk about it, or uncovering corruption, it's not that the majority of the media buries stories that they don't like... It's a job you need to get paid for. It has many different kinds of ethical standards. I've been digging very hard regarding Ferguson/St. Louis and there is too much to cover in the first place that is properly sourced and proven, let alone some kind of Islamic Connection which I really haven't been able to find anything solid about.

 

 

Im well aware of what journalism is and isnt. Real journalism died with Don Bolles. The local media giant proclaimed a few years ago that journalism today is about bringing about change, not about reporting news. 

[Guest shiloh357]

 

 

 

The outside protesters who are being bussed into Ferguson, MO apparently have strong ties to Islamic terrorism 

 

These protesters have their own agenda that has nothing material to do with the death of Michael Brown. These groups are anti-law enforcement and his death is being exploited to that end.  

 

This connection is largely ignored by the liberal media.

That is because the "liberal media" has to do fact checking to make sure the story they are running is reliable. Virtually every news agency is there doing research, talking to people, taking photos, taking notes, doing fact checking, they probably have better things to write about than some garbage what guy on youtube with a bad green screen and stock intro audio from iMovie is talking about. They are actual journalists, actually in St Louis, doing actual research, talking to actual people, at actual protests, instead of regurgitating a bunch of stuff they managed to google that supports their beliefs. 

 

 

 

The liberal media also buries stories that do not meet their agenda. That was easily seen in the first election that obama won in which negative stories about who he was (Im not talking about the birth certificate but legitimate stories) were buried or not reported. 

 

It is clear that islamic terrorist groups are interested in events in ferguson tho. You can find that info in any mainstream media such as the washington post.

 

If you're publishing an article about the events in Ferguson and St Louis, there are a lot of things a journalist keeps in mind. These may be a few.

 

They may have to crank out several smaller stories a day especially if they work for a newspaper. Following up on multiple leads, going and talking to people, is a lot of work. You can't just do that on the phone for the most part. You have to go to places where things are happening. What is the most important thing happening? Is it especially current? Is it relevant to the current situation? Do you have multiple reliable sources? Do you need to write AND do you need a photographer around? Is this OK'd by the paper? Do you need to pitch it to a paper? Do you need to dig for an inordinate amount of time to find out whether there is something good, or is this just a waste of time because there isn't a lot to support it? Do you have at least two sources closer to the action that can actually prove this? Do you have solid evidence or is it some guy who says he thinks this is happening? If it's happening, can you actually talk to people involved in this, get a source from inside this Organiation? (For example, leader of a KKK faction stated they were going to shoot protesters. That's a proper source. Someone saying that the KKK could do this is less reliable. Saying that some guy is part of some Muslim Organization which has connections to these guys and once another guy was charged with something so circumstantially this my be evidence that not everybody in the organization has a criminal record... Like, what they guy was doing in the youtube video, that's a lot of guilt by association, which isn't solid at all.) If it is actually happening, can you prove it? Is this fair or am I spinning this? Am I inserting my own opinion into this story somehow? Is it ethical to try pursue this story? Am I being a huge dingus to people I am interviewing for this?

 

Stories about protests happening that happen on an almost daily basis are current, people can be interviewed at these places for good sources, good photos accompany these stories which get them higher up in the paper. For example, one protest today in St Louis was covered by several local news channels, newspapers, and at least one newswire. 

 

Finding evidence of a secret Muslim Conspiracy is a lot of hard work that is unlikely to pay, or have proper evidence be found for it, if at all. That could be weeks worth of digging to get one quality article with actual evidence and sources behind it, if anything could to proven or be able to ethically run a professional level article about it. The fact that there are ongoing acts of well organized non-violent civil disobedience with several groups co-operating that was announced just the night before, something that shuts down traffic... That's something to write about.

 

Journalism isn't just a romantic profession of finding hidden secret stories that nobody else wants to talk about it, or uncovering corruption, it's not that the majority of the media buries stories that they don't like... It's a job you need to get paid for. It has many different kinds of ethical standards. I've been digging very hard regarding Ferguson/St. Louis and there is too much to cover in the first place that is properly sourced and proven, let alone some kind of Islamic Connection which I really haven't been able to find anything solid about.

 

None of that serves as an adequate excuse as to why the Liberal media decided that Darren Wilson was a racist police officer who gunned before they had any evidence.

 

That's why the claim that there is no evidence of an Islamic connection in this story really carries no weight.   The liberal media is notorious for the way it tried to run interference for Obama when he was caught lying to the American people, and why the liberal media refused for days to cover the story of Jonathan Gruber and the way he exposed how the the American people about Obamacare.

 

The liberal media does its dead-level best to shield Islamic terrorism and refuses to report on terrorism as terrorism because liberals have a school-girl crush with Islam and its terrorists groups. 

 

It has nothing to do with being soooo busy trying to get the right story.  The liberal media has the same facts that everyone else does, but refuses to cover certain stories that expose truth and affect the public narrative in a way that liberals don't like.

 

Liberal media sources like CNN and the BBC have more in common with the Cartoon Network than they do with good, honest journalism.   Liberal journalism is a joke and it is, for the most part, unethical.   The liberal media reports selected stories, the stories it likes and it purposely shields people like Obama from negative coverage. 

 

There was a time when journalism in the US was respectable and served as a watchdog that kept the US government honest and transparent.  But today, liberal journalism in the US is the president's back pocket.  They are mouthpiece of liberalism and really have lost all credibility.

 

The way the Liberal media jumped on the story in Ferguson is a good example of how sloppy and agenda-driven they are.  They ran with the race narrative before any evidence of a hate crime was presented.  When the evidence from the autopsy didn't support the hate crime narrative, the liberal media didn't change their reporting to match the evidence.  They simply ignored it.

 

When the video surfaced that showed Michael Brown not as innocent black teenager, but rather showed him roughing up a convenience store owner and stealing cigars, the liberal media tried to deflect from it.    When it was found that Michael Brown had Marijuana in his system at the time of the altercation with Darren Wilson, that important evidence was ignored by the media.

 

The liberal media is STILL covering this like it is a hate crime and not having the evidence to support that allegation doesn't seem to matter to them at all.  They WANT this to be a hate crime.  They want there to be a protest  and I think the liberal media is giddy with anticipation that protests will be violent.  They are counting on it. The liberal media is doing its best to maintain the hate crime narrative and any and all evidence to the contrary will be ignored and/or buried.

 

So really, the truth is that the Islamic connection, which has been made by more than one source will be buried by the media, particularly if it is true. It will be mocked and ignored by the media.   If  that connection as any validity at all, the evidence will not see the light of day if the media has any say in the matter.   So even if it is true, the liberal media doesn't possess the integrity or honesty or strength of character to present it.  They shield Islam and its terrorists whom they revere and support from any negative coverage, particularly if its true.   That they hide such information doesn't mean it isn't true and that has been proven over and over and over again in other contexts.

[Guest shiloh357]

Muslim protesters in Ferguson   http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/10/03/Palestinian-Group-Plans-Weekend-of-Resistance-in-Ferguson

 

ISIS is injecting itself into the Ferguson protests  "ISIS militants and their supporters are using social media to encourage protesters in Ferguson to embrace radical Islam and fight against the U.S. government."  http://drrichswier.com/2014/08/20/isis-banner-ferguson-missouri-jihadis-try-exploit-race-conflict/

[other one]

Muslim protesters in Ferguson   http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/10/03/Palestinian-Group-Plans-Weekend-of-Resistance-in-Ferguson

 

ISIS is injecting itself into the Ferguson protests  "ISIS militants and their supporters are using social media to encourage protesters in Ferguson to embrace radical Islam and fight against the U.S. government."  http://drrichswier.com/2014/08/20/isis-banner-ferguson-missouri-jihadis-try-exploit-race-conflict/

and apparently are succeeding.   I saw something yesterday on TV about the family asking the UN of all things to arrest the policeman.

[Guest shiloh357]

 

Muslim protesters in Ferguson   http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/10/03/Palestinian-Group-Plans-Weekend-of-Resistance-in-Ferguson

 

ISIS is injecting itself into the Ferguson protests  "ISIS militants and their supporters are using social media to encourage protesters in Ferguson to embrace radical Islam and fight against the U.S. government."  http://drrichswier.com/2014/08/20/isis-banner-ferguson-missouri-jihadis-try-exploit-race-conflict/

and apparently are succeeding.   I saw something yesterday on TV about the family asking the UN of all things to arrest the policeman.

 

Yes, I saw several articles about  the family asking for the UN to come in arrest the police officers.  I think the protesters were requesting that, as well.

[other one]

I know we aren't supposed to use that word but fool will just not pass out of my mind.

[Guest shiloh357]

I know we aren't supposed to use that word but fool will just not pass out of my mind.

Well the original word for "fool" that Jesus prohibited isn't the same as our English word fool.  It was a much worse word and Jesus was talking using that ancient word falsely against someone. 

 

The protesters are "fools" in the modern sense of the English word

[Burning_Ember]

Muslim protesters in Ferguson   http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/10/03/Palestinian-Group-Plans-Weekend-of-Resistance-in-Ferguson

 

ISIS is injecting itself into the Ferguson protests  "ISIS militants and their supporters are using social media to encourage protesters in Ferguson to embrace radical Islam and fight against the U.S. government."  http://drrichswier.com/2014/08/20/isis-banner-ferguson-missouri-jihadis-try-exploit-race-conflict/

Local activist groups have trained up at least 1,000 people for non-violent protests. Those protesters went on to shut down intersections, they train people to treat people exposed to tear gas and pepper spray, they organize people in the community, etc. They actually do things, actual journalist go interview those people, mgo speak to them, etc. They are geared up for huge protests if the indictment is negative.

 

That is far more material to the situation than ISIS trying to use twitter from the other side of the world, which apparently hasn't really done anything other than that.

[JustinM]

Is calling people morons, idiots, and losers really the best way to help? Reckon that's what God calls them?

Well, from where Shiloh is sitting, I doubt there's anything he could do, or say, that would impact the protesters in any way.

 

I don't think anyone can really claim they know what God would say or do about these protesters.

 

What are they protesting?  What grievances do they really have with the government/police department?

 

Honestly, I believe them to be a mob and when people join a mob, they are making an immoral and stupid decision.

 

They have no legitimate grievance against the police department, therefore they have no legitimacy as "protesters."

 

We now know the officer acted lawfully and in self defense, so why are they still protesting Michael Brown's death?  Michael Brown assaulted a clerk and stole from him, then assaulted and nearly killed a police officer attempting to apprehend him for the crime.

 

The real victim to come from this incident is the rule of law.  The mob in Ferguson doesn't want the rule of law there, it wants revenge, because one of its own was killed by a white man.  It doesn't matter to them, that this white man was a peace officer, defending himself from a violent criminal.  

 

It's about time we make a stand for the rule of law and deal with the mob harshly, otherwise, we are another police shooting away from more ethnic violence, and innocent people may actually get hurt/killed next time.