Jump to content
IGNORED

Pope vs. Gunowners


Recommended Posts

Guest AFlameOfFire
Posted

Although, when I look up the kind of gun the vatican police use it shows the Koch MP5 sub-machine gun

 

vatican03-secuurity--400x300.jpg

 

You can see them demonstrated over at youtube, but wouldnt that be considered a weapon of war?

 

 

 

The context of his remarks are war.

He said nothing about use by civil servants or private use.

And the weapons of war are much more heavy duty than that.

Do you see them carrying missile launchers?

Stinger
FIM-92 Stinger USMC.JPG

javelinmp_h15s.jpg

 

Iran-revealed-details-of-its-Maiagh-shou

You edited your post, The Heckler and Koch is the world second largest manufacturer of handguns, assault rifles, submachine gines and grenade launchers they are all the carnal "weapons of war".

 

All Heckler and Koch machine guns

 

UTK_PGK_Assault_Team.jpg

 

444063.jpg

 

National-Security-Guard.jpg

 

heckler-and-koch-hk-mp5_4.jpg

MP59mm_460x306px.jpg?h=299&mh=299&mw=460

u-s-marines-from-alpha-fleet-anti-terror

 

 

Guest AFlameOfFire
Posted

Okay, so the pope is cool with citizens having these machine guns, because he wasnt really adressing them (or machine guns( his own civil servants use)  the pope just wants all millitarys to stop using stingers?

Am I catching his drift better?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  58
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  5,457
  • Content Per Day:  1.51
  • Reputation:   4,220
  • Days Won:  37
  • Joined:  07/01/2015
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Okay, so the pope is cool with citizens having these machine guns, because he wasnt really adressing them (or machine guns( his own civil servants use)  the pope just wants all millitarys to stop using stingers?

Am I catching his drift better?

Think about how far military weapons go beyond what is used by civilians and civil servants.   We aren't just talking hand held weapons we see in civilian use.

Notice he never says gun.

Notice he only speaks of war.

Guest AFlameOfFire
Posted

Okay, so the pope is cool with citizens having these machine guns, because he wasnt really adressing them (or machine guns( his own civil servants use)  the pope just wants all millitarys to stop using stingers?

Am I catching his drift better?

Think about how far military weapons go beyond what is used by civilians and civil servants.   We aren't just talking hand held weapons we see in civilian use.

Notice he never says gun.

Notice he only speaks of war.

I dont even know that is supposed to mean, he speaks of war now (not weapons of war now).

The goal posts feel like they are shifting here, I show what the vatican police carry which are machine guns (used as weapons of war in wars by soldiers) made by the second largest manufacturer of all the same. You show me stingers (point to those) yet come back and clarify he never says gun, can you tell me where he says stinger?

But I cant notice what he says he doesnt speak English and I dont speak his language, and hasnt the gift of tongues to come in loud and clear so that I can understand him but he has lots of folks speaking for him and interpreting whatever he says, but they do him more harm then good and the conversation just becomes labuorsome, circular and more obscure, never clear. 


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  58
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  5,457
  • Content Per Day:  1.51
  • Reputation:   4,220
  • Days Won:  37
  • Joined:  07/01/2015
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Okay, so the pope is cool with citizens having these machine guns, because he wasnt really adressing them (or machine guns( his own civil servants use)  the pope just wants all millitarys to stop using stingers?

Am I catching his drift better?

Think about how far military weapons go beyond what is used by civilians and civil servants.   We aren't just talking hand held weapons we see in civilian use.

Notice he never says gun.

Notice he only speaks of war.

I dont even know that is supposed to mean, he speaks of war now (not weapons of war now).

The goal posts feel like they are shifting here, I show what the vatican police carry which are machine guns (used as weapons of war in wars by soldiers) made by the second largest manufacturer of all the same. You show me stingers (point to those) yet come back and clarify he never says gun, can you tell me where he says stinger?

But I cant notice what he says he doesnt speak English and I dont speak his language, and hasnt the gift of tongues to come in loud and clear so that I can understand him but he has lots of folks speaking for him and interpreting whatever he says, but they do him more harm then good and the conversation just becomes labuorsome, circular and more obscure, never clear. 

That's why I linked you a translation.  :)

 

Guest AFlameOfFire
Posted

Okay, so the pope is cool with citizens having these machine guns, because he wasnt really adressing them (or machine guns( his own civil servants use)  the pope just wants all millitarys to stop using stingers?

Am I catching his drift better?

Think about how far military weapons go beyond what is used by civilians and civil servants.   We aren't just talking hand held weapons we see in civilian use.

Notice he never says gun.

Notice he only speaks of war.

I dont even know that is supposed to mean, he speaks of war now (not weapons of war now).

The goal posts feel like they are shifting here, I show what the vatican police carry which are machine guns (used as weapons of war in wars by soldiers) made by the second largest manufacturer of all the same. You show me stingers (point to those) yet come back and clarify he never says gun, can you tell me where he says stinger?

But I cant notice what he says he doesnt speak English and I dont speak his language, and hasnt the gift of tongues to come in loud and clear so that I can understand him but he has lots of folks speaking for him and interpreting whatever he says, but they do him more harm then good and the conversation just becomes labuorsome, circular and more obscure, never clear. 

That's why I linked you a translation.  :)

 

Okay, so the pope is cool with citizens having these machine guns, because he wasnt really adressing them (or machine guns( his own civil servants use)  the pope just wants all millitarys to stop using stingers?

Am I catching his drift better?

Think about how far military weapons go beyond what is used by civilians and civil servants.   We aren't just talking hand held weapons we see in civilian use.

Notice he never says gun.

Notice he only speaks of war.

I dont even know that is supposed to mean, he speaks of war now (not weapons of war now).

The goal posts feel like they are shifting here, I show what the vatican police carry which are machine guns (used as weapons of war in wars by soldiers) made by the second largest manufacturer of all the same. You show me stingers (point to those) yet come back and clarify he never says gun, can you tell me where he says stinger?

But I cant notice what he says he doesnt speak English and I dont speak his language, and hasnt the gift of tongues to come in loud and clear so that I can understand him but he has lots of folks speaking for him and interpreting whatever he says, but they do him more harm then good and the conversation just becomes labuorsome, circular and more obscure, never clear. 

That's why I linked you a translation.  :)

 

That just makes everything so clear, thank you

 

 


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  58
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  5,457
  • Content Per Day:  1.51
  • Reputation:   4,220
  • Days Won:  37
  • Joined:  07/01/2015
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Okay, so the pope is cool with citizens having these machine guns, because he wasnt really adressing them (or machine guns( his own civil servants use)  the pope just wants all millitarys to stop using stingers?

Am I catching his drift better?

Think about how far military weapons go beyond what is used by civilians and civil servants.   We aren't just talking hand held weapons we see in civilian use.

Notice he never says gun.

Notice he only speaks of war.

I dont even know that is supposed to mean, he speaks of war now (not weapons of war now).

The goal posts feel like they are shifting here, I show what the vatican police carry which are machine guns (used as weapons of war in wars by soldiers) made by the second largest manufacturer of all the same. You show me stingers (point to those) yet come back and clarify he never says gun, can you tell me where he says stinger?

But I cant notice what he says he doesnt speak English and I dont speak his language, and hasnt the gift of tongues to come in loud and clear so that I can understand him but he has lots of folks speaking for him and interpreting whatever he says, but they do him more harm then good and the conversation just becomes labuorsome, circular and more obscure, never clear. 

That's why I linked you a translation.  :)

 

 

Okay, so the pope is cool with citizens having these machine guns, because he wasnt really adressing them (or machine guns( his own civil servants use)  the pope just wants all millitarys to stop using stingers?

Am I catching his drift better?

Think about how far military weapons go beyond what is used by civilians and civil servants.   We aren't just talking hand held weapons we see in civilian use.

Notice he never says gun.

Notice he only speaks of war.

I dont even know that is supposed to mean, he speaks of war now (not weapons of war now).

The goal posts feel like they are shifting here, I show what the vatican police carry which are machine guns (used as weapons of war in wars by soldiers) made by the second largest manufacturer of all the same. You show me stingers (point to those) yet come back and clarify he never says gun, can you tell me where he says stinger?

But I cant notice what he says he doesnt speak English and I dont speak his language, and hasnt the gift of tongues to come in loud and clear so that I can understand him but he has lots of folks speaking for him and interpreting whatever he says, but they do him more harm then good and the conversation just becomes labuorsome, circular and more obscure, never clear. 

That's why I linked you a translation.  :)

 

That just makes everything so clear, thank you

 

 

Really being sarcastic isn't going to help things at all.

The media tried to make this something it isn't.

People jumped on the bandwagon and began castigating the pope for saying something he didn't really say.

I provided a translation which shows he wasn't speaking of gun ownership but of weapons of war and what happens in war.

I don't know what else to tell you.

 

 

Guest shiloh357
Posted

Men have been manufacturing weapons since the beginning. Both the bow and/or a spear was used to hunt beasts (to eat) and to go to war with other peoples. Guns are just another one of the same, to do what the former always did. 

Lots of folks support the manufacture of guns for hunting. Lots of guys love to hunt.

 

 

it's not about guns for all their varied uses  - it's about weapons of WAR.    

People who hunt don't use sub machine guns or worse.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It's not

The Pope has at his disposal a 135 man crack commando team called "The Swiss Guard"  and they are heavily armed with the latest and most sophisticated "weapons of war."   The have some of the most sophisticated machine guns and other weapons and their sole purpose is to serve as the Pope's "army."

So, according to you, the Pope is only against the manufacture of weapons of war, but has no problem being defended by those same "evil"  weapons made by those evil weapons manufacturers.

The Pope is a complete hypocrite.   There really is no way around it. 

Guest shiloh357
Posted

Okay, so the pope is cool with citizens having these machine guns, because he wasnt really adressing them (or machine guns( his own civil servants use)  the pope just wants all millitarys to stop using stingers?

Am I catching his drift better?

Think about how far military weapons go beyond what is used by civilians and civil servants.   We aren't just talking hand held weapons we see in civilian use.

Notice he never says gun.

Notice he only speaks of war.

I dont even know that is supposed to mean, he speaks of war now (not weapons of war now).

The goal posts feel like they are shifting here, I show what the vatican police carry which are machine guns (used as weapons of war in wars by soldiers) made by the second largest manufacturer of all the same. You show me stingers (point to those) yet come back and clarify he never says gun, can you tell me where he says stinger?

But I cant notice what he says he doesnt speak English and I dont speak his language, and hasnt the gift of tongues to come in loud and clear so that I can understand him but he has lots of folks speaking for him and interpreting whatever he says, but they do him more harm then good and the conversation just becomes labuorsome, circular and more obscure, never clear. 

That's why I linked you a translation.  :)

 

 

Okay, so the pope is cool with citizens having these machine guns, because he wasnt really adressing them (or machine guns( his own civil servants use)  the pope just wants all millitarys to stop using stingers?

Am I catching his drift better?

Think about how far military weapons go beyond what is used by civilians and civil servants.   We aren't just talking hand held weapons we see in civilian use.

Notice he never says gun.

Notice he only speaks of war.

I dont even know that is supposed to mean, he speaks of war now (not weapons of war now).

The goal posts feel like they are shifting here, I show what the vatican police carry which are machine guns (used as weapons of war in wars by soldiers) made by the second largest manufacturer of all the same. You show me stingers (point to those) yet come back and clarify he never says gun, can you tell me where he says stinger?

But I cant notice what he says he doesnt speak English and I dont speak his language, and hasnt the gift of tongues to come in loud and clear so that I can understand him but he has lots of folks speaking for him and interpreting whatever he says, but they do him more harm then good and the conversation just becomes labuorsome, circular and more obscure, never clear. 

That's why I linked you a translation.  :)

 

That just makes everything so clear, thank you

 

 

Really being sarcastic isn't going to help things at all.

The media tried to make this something it isn't.

People jumped on the bandwagon and began castigating the pope for saying something he didn't really say.

I provided a translation which shows he wasn't speaking of gun ownership but of weapons of war and what happens in war.

I don't know what else to tell you.

 

 

The media didn't make this out to be something it isn't.   You are simply tasked with defending hypocrisy.   The Pope was not misquoted and he said what he said.   The problem is the hypocritical double standard he has in operation.   He is against the gun manufacturers, but is willing to be defended by those same guns that he claims it is immoral to make or use in war.  

Guest AFlameOfFire
Posted

Okay, so the pope is cool with citizens having these machine guns, because he wasnt really adressing them (or machine guns( his own civil servants use)  the pope just wants all millitarys to stop using stingers?

Am I catching his drift better?

Think about how far military weapons go beyond what is used by civilians and civil servants.   We aren't just talking hand held weapons we see in civilian use.

Notice he never says gun.

Notice he only speaks of war.

I dont even know that is supposed to mean, he speaks of war now (not weapons of war now).

The goal posts feel like they are shifting here, I show what the vatican police carry which are machine guns (used as weapons of war in wars by soldiers) made by the second largest manufacturer of all the same. You show me stingers (point to those) yet come back and clarify he never says gun, can you tell me where he says stinger?

But I cant notice what he says he doesnt speak English and I dont speak his language, and hasnt the gift of tongues to come in loud and clear so that I can understand him but he has lots of folks speaking for him and interpreting whatever he says, but they do him more harm then good and the conversation just becomes labuorsome, circular and more obscure, never clear. 

That's why I linked you a translation.  :)

 

 

Okay, so the pope is cool with citizens having these machine guns, because he wasnt really adressing them (or machine guns( his own civil servants use)  the pope just wants all millitarys to stop using stingers?

Am I catching his drift better?

Think about how far military weapons go beyond what is used by civilians and civil servants.   We aren't just talking hand held weapons we see in civilian use.

Notice he never says gun.

Notice he only speaks of war.

I dont even know that is supposed to mean, he speaks of war now (not weapons of war now

Okay, so the pope is cool with citizens having these machine guns, because he wasnt really adressing them (or machine guns( his own civil servants use)  the pope just wants all millitarys to stop using stingers?

Am I catching his drift better?

Think about how far military weapons go beyond what is used by civilians and civil servants.   We aren't just talking hand held weapons we see in civilian use.

Notice he never says gun.

Notice he only speaks of war.

I dont even know that is supposed to mean, he speaks of war now (not weapons of war now).

The goal posts feel like they are shifting here, I show what the vatican police carry which are machine guns (used as weapons of war in wars by soldiers) made by the second largest manufacturer of all the same. You show me stingers (point to those) yet come back and clarify he never says gun, can you tell me where he says stinger?

But I cant notice what he says he doesnt speak English and I dont speak his language, and hasnt the gift of tongues to come in loud and clear so that I can understand him but he has lots of folks speaking for him and interpreting whatever he says, but they do him more harm then good and the conversation just becomes labuorsome, circular and more obscure, never clear. 

That's why I linked you a translation.  :)

 

 

Okay, so the pope is cool with citizens having these machine guns, because he wasnt really adressing them (or machine guns( his own civil servants use)  the pope just wants all millitarys to stop using stingers?

Am I catching his drift better?

Think about how far military weapons go beyond what is used by civilians and civil servants.   We aren't just talking hand held weapons we see in civilian use.

Notice he never says gun.

Notice he only speaks of war.

I dont even know that is supposed to mean, he speaks of war now (not weapons of war now).

The goal posts feel like they are shifting here, I show what the vatican police carry which are machine guns (used as weapons of war in wars by soldiers) made by the second largest manufacturer of all the same. You show me stingers (point to those) yet come back and clarify he never says gun, can you tell me where he says stinger?

But I cant notice what he says he doesnt speak English and I dont speak his language, and hasnt the gift of tongues to come in loud and clear so that I can understand him but he has lots of folks speaking for him and interpreting whatever he says, but they do him more harm then good and the conversation just becomes labuorsome, circular and more obscure, never clear. 

That's why I linked you a translation.  :)

 

That just makes everything so clear, thank you

 

 

Really being sarcastic isn't going to help things at all.

The media tried to make this something it isn't.

People jumped on the bandwagon and began castigating the pope for saying something he didn't really say.

I provided a translation which shows he wasn't speaking of gun ownership but of weapons of war and what happens in war.

I don't know what else to tell yOU

 

 

I jumped on this thread by accident it was the wrong gun thread from my first post, I should have departed from it but in the second page here I was going off of your words speaking of the "weapons of war" at the top of the post your link was on.

 Sorry, I just really wanted to cut out of conversing any further on this, its becoming hell to get the reply box to work in this thread, it keeps copying all the threads in and then making it too tight with this red line to type responses in and I need to play around inside of it to actually type. Its just getting annoying.

You dont need to tell me anything, I was just going to forget the post altogether, what he says or does not really should be of interest of concern to me anyway.

 

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...