Marcus O'Reillius Posted August 18, 2016 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 2 Topic Count: 4 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 1,050 Content Per Day: 0.36 Reputation: 632 Days Won: 3 Joined: 03/29/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted August 18, 2016 19 hours ago, Ezra said: I have not "equated" the Tribulation and the Great Tribulation at all. The question was how you equated the one 'seven' to the Great Tribulation. You "assign" the one 'seven' as Tribulation, and then make the minor distinction of having the second half be great. Let me rephrase the question so it fits your eschatology: How is it that you say the one 'seven' is the Tribulation Period? What specific Scripture allows this designation? 19 hours ago, Ezra said: It is pretty clear that there is no need to "back into anything". We simply take all Scriptures into account. Anytime someone tells me it is "clear," I know I am reading their conclusion, and that the matter is anything but "clear." We all take Scripture into account because it cannot be broken, but most eschatology I read about limit what they take and ignore what doesn't comport with how they fashion it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts