Hoddie Posted November 25, 2016 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 4 Topic Count: 1 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 423 Content Per Day: 0.15 Reputation: 244 Days Won: 1 Joined: 08/07/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted November 25, 2016 7 hours ago, Ezra said: Roman Catholics have been taught that any interpretation of the Bible which rejects their doctrines is "personal" and "private" and unworthy of serious consideration, since it is merely an "opinion". Is that right Erza..... if this is the case, you should have no problem showing from any official Catholic source that make such a claim. Like maybe from the Catechism of the Catholic Church for starters. If you cannot, are you willing to do the right right thing and admit you were wrong? But when the Pope says that climate change is the biggest threat to mankind, that is perfectly OK, even though it is total nonsense. Total nonsence? Do you have a Degree in Climatology, a degree which deals with climates and their phenomena to make such a serious claim? If not, would you again admit that this is just your opinion, and made it knowing darn well you were completely out of your realm? Peace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoddie Posted November 25, 2016 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 4 Topic Count: 1 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 423 Content Per Day: 0.15 Reputation: 244 Days Won: 1 Joined: 08/07/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted November 25, 2016 8 hours ago, warrior12 said: Hoddie, how come you choose that name man/miss, every time i see your name, i have an imagination of a guy in the hood. This is my rational thinking. Anyway the Scripture verse below is just for contemplation and refers to no one or projected to none. Lol!! it has nothing to do with being in a hood. Short story, a Hod was a tool used in the Brick Masonry trade wayyyyyyy back in the day, and the name stuck. I was a Hoddie for 37 years before I retired. It was a hard trade, burt made a good living at it along with a good pension. (we were a union shop) To get the full gist of the trade.... Google "Hod Carrier" Peace p.s. I like your username, any significance behind it? Oh yeah....... I'm a Dude! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coheir Posted November 25, 2016 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 3 Topic Count: 104 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 2,458 Content Per Day: 0.55 Reputation: 729 Days Won: 5 Joined: 02/09/2012 Status: Offline Birthday: 01/31/1950 Share Posted November 25, 2016 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Hoddie said: Lol!! it has nothing to do with being in a hood. Short story, a Hod was a tool used in the Brick Masonry trade wayyyyyyy back in the day, and the name stuck. I was a Hoddie for 37 years before I retired. It was a hard trade, burt made a good living at it along with a good pension. (we were a union shop) To get the full gist of the trade.... Google "Hod Carrier" Peace p.s. I like your username, any significance behind it? Oh yeah....... I'm a Dude! When I laid brick we called that job a mud man of course that was not waaay back in the day, I was a mud man for a year before I got on the wall. Cool name and cool info I did not know mud man came from hod or hoddie Edited November 25, 2016 by coheir Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ezra Posted November 25, 2016 Group: Royal Member Followers: 16 Topic Count: 134 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 8,142 Content Per Day: 2.35 Reputation: 6,612 Days Won: 20 Joined: 11/02/2014 Status: Offline Share Posted November 25, 2016 50 minutes ago, Hoddie said: Is that right Erza..... if this is the case, you should have no problem showing from any official Catholic source that make such a claim. An official source of Catholic teaching is the New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia. What we see in the quotation below is that only the Church (meaning the RCC) has the right and authority to interpret Scripture: "As regards Biblical interpretation properly so called the Church is infallible in the sense that, whether by authentic decision of pope or council, or by its current teaching that a given passage of Scripture has a certain meaning, this meaning must be regarded as the true sense of the passage in question. It claims this power of infallible interpretation only in matters of faith and morals, that is where religious or moral truth is in danger, directly, if the text or passage belongs to the moral and religious order..." 51 minutes ago, Hoddie said: Do you have a Degree in Climatology, a degree which deals with climates and their phenomena to make such a serious claim? I don't need a degree in Climatology to discover nonsense. There is a whole body of qualified scientists who specialize in this field and who have made it clear that man-made climate change is a hoax- plain and simple. Hence Trump will be shutting down NASA's experiments in this area. But so are all the claims of infallibility and Magisterium that emanate from Rome. If the Pope's teachings were really true to Scripture, then at least 95-98% of the RCC's teachings and practices would have to be jettisoned. OUCH! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoddie Posted November 25, 2016 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 4 Topic Count: 1 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 423 Content Per Day: 0.15 Reputation: 244 Days Won: 1 Joined: 08/07/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted November 25, 2016 12 hours ago, Ezra said: An official source of Catholic teaching is the New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia. What we see in the quotation below is that only the Church (meaning the RCC) has the right and authority to interpret Scripture: "As regards Biblical interpretation properly so called the Church is infallible in the sense that, whether by authentic decision of pope or council, or by its current teaching that a given passage of Scripture has a certain meaning, this meaning must be regarded as the true sense of the passage in question. It claims this power of infallible interpretation only in matters of faith and morals, that is where religious or moral truth is in danger, directly, if the text or passage belongs to the moral and religious order..." Sorry Erza, But I couldn't find these two sentences in the New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia, maybe I was looking in the wrong area. However, I can give the web-site if people want to see the fullness of it, something you failed to mention. And it would be my belief if people go to the site, and read it in it's entirety, they will then see for themselves why. Ouch! It is a bit lengthy, but worth the read..... not the couple of sentences that dosen't give it justice like you posted. The site is: www.newadvent.org › Catholic Encyclopedia ›/Infallibility. What we see in the quotation below is that only the Church (meaning the RCC) has the right and authority to interpret Scripture: Really..... Is that what you truly believe? I'll ask you the same thing I've asked a few others.... How about the Maronite Catholics, Ukrainian Catholics, and Chaldean Catholics? I don't need a degree in Climatology to discover nonsense. There is a whole body of qualified scientists who specialize in this field and who have made it clear that man-made climate change is a hoax- plain and simple. Hmmmm. I wonder if some of the folks in the South Pacific, living on one of the hundreds of islands that are only a couple of feet above sea-level, would agree with ya. But so are all the claims of infallibility and Magisterium that emanate from Rome. If the Pope's teachings were really true to Scripture, then at least 95-98% of the RCC's teachings and practices would have to be jettisoned. In the matters of faith and morals? Give some examples Erza, for I'd wouldn't mind.......as Jed Clampette would say " git dat dar feller an edge-u-cation." OUCH
Recommended Posts