Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 minutes ago, Enoch2021 said:

They're Baseless because you haven't provided "The Basis" for it.

 

1.  We don't "Guess" in Science.

2.  Begging The Question (Fallacy): "controlled study".

 

Then your evidence is... "Baseless".

 

regards

You do realize this data is published in scientific journals and they charge a fee to download these articles? Some of them run over $30 dollars per journal article if you don't have a subscription. I have access to my graduate library from my university but I'm not 100% sure I have access to all of these journal subscriptions. Just because I haven't provided an article doesn't mean they didn't do a controlled study on it. That's ridiculous. I doubt you've even done the research yourself on this topic regarding the age of the earth's core. If you have, can you provide it and prove the earth wasn't 4.5 billion years old? Or am I supposed to do all the work for you?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  11
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  3,396
  • Content Per Day:  0.82
  • Reputation:   730
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  12/21/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/26/1963

Posted
1 minute ago, Allroses48 said:

You do realize this data is published in scientific journals and they charge a fee to download these articles?

Yep, but that's not my problem; I'm not the one making the claim.

 

Quote

Some of them run over $30 dollars per journal article if you don't have a subscription. I have access to my graduate library from my university but I'm not 100% sure I have access to all of these journal subscriptions.

Well then, you need to be more careful when making claims you can't support.

 

Quote

Just because I haven't provided an article doesn't mean they didn't do a controlled study on it.

It most assuredly doesn't mean they DID.

 

Quote

That's ridiculous.

So asking you to provide support for your claims is ridiculous? :rolleyes:

 

Quote

I doubt you've even done the research yourself on this topic regarding the age of the earth's core.

How do you know that??  Please provide the 'Method' you used to arrive at your conclusion...?

 

Quote

If you have, can you provide it and prove the earth wasn't 4.5 billion years old?

As I mentioned a few times previously... It's the Acme of Foolishness to even consider, much less attempt, to disprove Complete Arguments from Ignorance Fallacies.  I don't entertain them, it's one of my Refrigerator Rules. ;)

 

Quote

Or am I supposed to do all the work for you?

"YOU" made the Claim, "YOU" need to support it.  It's not "MY" Job to support "YOUR" claims.

 

regards

Posted
5 minutes ago, Enoch2021 said:

Yep, but that's not my problem; I'm not the one making the claim.

 

Well then, you need to be more careful when making claims you can't support.

 

It most assuredly doesn't mean they DID.

 

So asking you to provide support for your claims is ridiculous? :rolleyes:

 

How do you know that??  Please provide the 'Method' you used to arrive at your conclusion...?

 

As I mentioned a few times previously... It's the Acme of Foolishness to even consider, much less attempt, to disprove Complete Arguments from Ignorance Fallacies.  I don't entertain them, it's one of my Refrigerator Rules. ;)

 

"YOU" made the Claim, "YOU" need to support it.  It's not "MY" Job to support "YOUR" claims.

 

regards

You are claiming the earth didn't occur through evolution, nor is it more than 6,000 years old. So what is your evidence to prove this then? This isn't a one sided debate and I'm not going to spend money on an article I doubt you've even researched yourself.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  11
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  3,396
  • Content Per Day:  0.82
  • Reputation:   730
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  12/21/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/26/1963

Posted
10 minutes ago, Allroses48 said:

You are claiming the earth didn't occur through evolution

Yes because evolution doesn't and NEVER Existed.

 

Quote

nor is it more than 6,000 years old. So what is your evidence to prove this then?

The Genealogies of Genesis 5 and 10.  (SEE also: James Ussher).  

And the Consistency with the Doctrine of Salvation.

 

Quote

This isn't a one sided debate and I'm not going to spend money on an article I doubt you've even researched yourself.

Well then, you can't SUPPORT "Your" Claims.

And please don't 'speculate' on what I have done, will, or won't do...besides being Painfully Irrelevant, it's silly. 

 

regards 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Enoch2021 said:

Yes because evolution doesn't and NEVER Existed.

 

The Genealogies of Genesis 5 and 10.  (SEE also: James Ussher).  

And the Consistency with the Doctrine of Salvation.

 

Well then, you can't SUPPORT "Your" Claims.

And please don't 'speculate' on what I have done, will, or won't do...besides being Painfully Irrelevant, it's silly. 

 

regards 

I can support my claims but I'm not willing to spend $ on articles I don't have access too and nowhere does it say I have spend money to do that when I need it for bills etc. The genealogies of Genesis 5/10 is not complete nor does it date the age of the earth. That is bad math from a YEC proponent named St. Bede and another Irish archbishop back in the 15th-17th century. There is no dating of the earth in the Bible at all. This is one article I found on my graduate library for free mentioned in Dr. Ross's article on ice core ages. Hopefully it's able to be uploaded.

frozen_time.pdf


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  11
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  3,396
  • Content Per Day:  0.82
  • Reputation:   730
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  12/21/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/26/1963

Posted
6 minutes ago, Allroses48 said:

I can support my claims

Then answer my simple queries...?

 

Quote

but I'm not willing to spend $ on articles I don't have access too and nowhere does it say I have spend money to do that when I need it for bills etc.

Then you can't SUPPORT "Your" claim.

 

Quote

The genealogies of Genesis 5/10 is not complete nor does it date the age of the earth.

1.  Who said they weren't complete?

2.  It doesn't need to Explicitly State it.  Do we have to go through "Contingent Necessary Facts" again??

 

Quote

That is bad math from a YEC proponent named St. Bede and another Irish archbishop back in the 15th-17th century.

Show...?

 

Quote

There is no dating of the earth in the Bible at all.

As I said, it's Implied and Consistent with the Doctrine of Salvation.

 

Quote

 

This is one article I found on my graduate library for free mentioned in Dr. Ross's article on ice core ages. Hopefully it's able to be uploaded.

frozen_time.pdf

 

1.  Dr. Ross isn't a "Scientist"; Ergo...the "Dr." part gets jettisoned into the Incoherent Oblivion.

2.  Dr. Ross is a heretic.

3.  Dr. Ross claims there's "Fossils" on the Moon.

 

regards

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Enoch2021 said:

Then answer my simple queries...?

 

Then you can't SUPPORT "Your" claim.

 

1.  Who said they weren't complete?

2.  It doesn't need to Explicitly State it.  Do we have to go through "Contingent Necessary Facts" again??

 

Show...?

 

As I said, it's Implied and Consistent with the Doctrine of Salvation.

 

1.  Dr. Ross isn't a "Scientist"; Ergo...the "Dr." part gets jettisoned into the Incoherent Oblivion.

2.  Dr. Ross is a heretic.

3.  Dr. Ross claims there's "Fossils" on the Moon.

 

regards

Dr. Hugh Ross is a scientist. He's an astrophysicist. He is not a heretic. He doesn't believe in this YEC baloney because it's completely lacking in evidence. I just posted a pdf article on the age of ice cores above from my graduate library. I guess you're not going to bother to read the evidence I'm presenting so this sounds more like you just want to argue and insist on 'being right'. Here is another pdf article from my grad library which you will probably completely ignore. FYI show where Jesus Christ said anything about the age of the earth. He didn't. There's no age of the earth in any biblical passage nor in any salvation doctrine.

a_great_grand_daddy_of_ice_cores.pdf

Edited by Allroses48

  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  11
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  3,396
  • Content Per Day:  0.82
  • Reputation:   730
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  12/21/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/26/1963

Posted
42 minutes ago, Allroses48 said:

Dr. Hugh Ross is a scientist.

And I'm a Saudi Prince and a Mau Mau Fighter Pilot.

 

Quote

He's an astrophysicist.

Ergo...he's NOT a "Scientist".  Do I need to explain WHY again??

 

Quote

He is not a heretic.

He is.  He 'believes': there was Death/Disease/Suffering/Thorns before "The Fall", a "Local" Flood, Moon Fossils, and a whole host of other Fairytales.

 

Quote

He doesn't believe in this YEC baloney because it's completely lacking in evidence.

There is No Scientific Evidence either way...as I already explained (IN DETAIL) here, many times.

 

Quote

I just posted a pdf article on the age of ice cores above from my graduate library.

So (AGAIN) pull out and post ...

a. What Phenomenon was Observed...?

b. Post the Formal Scientific Hypothesis then EXPERIMENT that validates your claim...?

c. Highlight the "Independent Variable" that was used in the TEST...?

d. Post the Null Hypothesis that was Rejected/Falsified...?

 

Quote

I guess you're not going to bother to read the evidence I'm presenting so this sounds more like you just want to argue and insist on 'being right'.

Well if you had any evidence, I probably wouldn't have requested answers to the simple queries above... for the 28th Time now.  :rolleyes:

 

Quote

Here is another pdf article from my grad library which you will probably completely ignore.

If it doesn't have the answers to my simple queries above...it's Painfully Worthless.

 

Quote

FYI show where Jesus Christ said anything about the age of the earth. He didn't.

Show where Jesus Christ said anything about creating Salamanders...?  HE didn't.  According to your logic, Salamanders don't Exist.

 

Quote

...in any biblical passage nor in any salvation doctrine.

Huh?? It's HERE, I posted it in this very thread... merely 2 pages ago.

 

regards

Posted
14 minutes ago, Enoch2021 said:

And I'm a Saudi Prince and a Mau Mau Fighter Pilot.

 

Ergo...he's NOT a "Scientist".  Do I need to explain WHY again??

 

He is.  He 'believes': there was Death/Disease/Suffering/Thorns before "The Fall", a "Local" Flood, Moon Fossils, and a whole host of other Fairytales.

 

There is No Scientific Evidence either way...as I already explained (IN DETAIL) here, many times.

 

So (AGAIN) pull out and post ...

a. What Phenomenon was Observed...?

b. Post the Formal Scientific Hypothesis then EXPERIMENT that validates your claim...?

c. Highlight the "Independent Variable" that was used in the TEST...?

d. Post the Null Hypothesis that was Rejected/Falsified...?

 

Well if you had any evidence, I probably wouldn't have requested answers to the simple queries above... for the 28th Time now.  :rolleyes:

 

If it doesn't have the answers to my simple queries above...it's Painfully Worthless.

 

Show where Jesus Christ said anything about creating Salamanders...?  HE didn't.  According to your logic, Salamanders don't Exist.

 

Huh?? It's HERE, I posted it in this very thread... merely 2 pages ago.

 

regards

Ok...so the fact that you can't or won't read the articles I've presented is very telling. I'm not going to rewrite the article or summarize it for you when you can do that on your own. This is clearly a waste of time and not worth it. I obviously wasted a lot of time researching those articles. This is not how you debate with a person doing all the work for you. Parroting the scientific method like you know it all doesn't prove a thing. It just makes you good at parroting.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...