Kindle Posted February 24, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 53 Topic Count: 88 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 4,064 Content Per Day: 1.36 Reputation: 3,748 Days Won: 8 Joined: 02/23/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2017 1 minute ago, ayin jade said: Maybe the agents did this knowing it would cause folks to be outraged, in a hope to get the policy overturned. Many agents are liberal and resisting trumps policy on illegals. Did jade just comment or am I dreaming lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Churchmouse Posted February 24, 2017 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 91 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 2,216 Content Per Day: 0.80 Reputation: 1,014 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/29/2016 Status: Offline Birthday: 04/02/1958 Share Posted February 24, 2017 1 minute ago, ayin jade said: Maybe the agents did this knowing it would cause folks to be outraged, in a hope to get the policy overturned. Many agents are liberal and resisting trumps policy on illegals. I would hope not, but I think this was orchestrated further up the food chain. As it is those who use ideology as a faith are as dedicated to their religion as we are to ours. It's just we benefit from our faith and they just move on to the next opportunity to anger people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missmuffet Posted February 24, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,991 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,689 Content Per Day: 11.81 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2017 Yahoo news can be kind of out there. If it were on CNN, CBS or Fox I might believe it. We do not know the whole story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted February 24, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Author Share Posted February 24, 2017 I think y'all missed the link I posted to Snopes....apparently the original article was only half true...see here: http://www.snopes.com/2017/02/23/woman-brain-tumor-placed-detention/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other one Posted February 24, 2017 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 598 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,127 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,855 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2017 i had really hoped there was a lot more to the story..... now I want to know why it happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneLight Posted February 24, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 22 Topic Count: 1,294 Topics Per Day: 0.21 Content Count: 31,762 Content Per Day: 5.23 Reputation: 9,762 Days Won: 115 Joined: 09/14/2007 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2017 8 hours ago, Churchmouse said: That's a man I truly pity. Personal Attack and banned from the thread - one point given for this reason. Steve had reiterated how personal attacks has a zero tolerance policy and that we will be forcing this stronger since people just ignore the warning - this goes for the whole site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneLight Posted February 24, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 22 Topic Count: 1,294 Topics Per Day: 0.21 Content Count: 31,762 Content Per Day: 5.23 Reputation: 9,762 Days Won: 115 Joined: 09/14/2007 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2017 I hid other remarks as well. When a warning has been in place for a very long time, and amended to reinforce the original warning to include any form of passive aggressive and underhanded remarks, it is your responsibility to ensure your replies are in accordance to the sites rules. Over the past two years the site has opened up to include more content than it once did while closing the loop for any form of attack/insult on another member. Take notice that we will be strongly enforcing these rules, and if you have not yet read the amendment, please click on the link in the previous post and read it. None of the members whose posts I hid were given a warning, nor have they been removed from posting in this thread as this is the first time we have acted to include such remarks. Next time, more actions will be taken. Please Brothers and Sisters, leave out any form of personal attacks, even if it is meant to jokingly pick on someone, as other may not share the same humor you have. When those in ministry are working to bring the site back to more godly conversation, your help is appreciated. Colossians 4:6 Let your speech always be with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer each one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jewels7 Posted February 25, 2017 Group: Senior Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 713 Content Per Day: 0.27 Reputation: 351 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/10/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted February 25, 2017 I just knew there was a fake news smell to this. If it is so inflammatory as to make the Trump administration look really bad check it first before you believe a news story. CNN is one of the worst offenders in something like fake news that purposefully slams Trump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kindle Posted February 25, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 53 Topic Count: 88 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 4,064 Content Per Day: 1.36 Reputation: 3,748 Days Won: 8 Joined: 02/23/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted February 25, 2017 12 hours ago, OneLight said: I hid other remarks as well. When a warning has been in place for a very long time, and amended to reinforce the original warning to include any form of passive aggressive and underhanded remarks, it is your responsibility to ensure your replies are in accordance to the sites rules. Over the past two years the site has opened up to include more content than it once did while closing the loop for any form of attack/insult on another member. Take notice that we will be strongly enforcing these rules, and if you have not yet read the amendment, please click on the link in the previous post and read it. None of the members whose posts I hid were given a warning, nor have they been removed from posting in this thread as this is the first time we have acted to include such remarks. Next time, more actions will be taken. Please Brothers and Sisters, leave out any form of personal attacks, even if it is meant to jokingly pick on someone, as other may not share the same humor you have. When those in ministry are working to bring the site back to more godly conversation, your help is appreciated. Colossians 4:6 Let your speech always be with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer each one. Thanks for the heads up OL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneLight Posted February 25, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 22 Topic Count: 1,294 Topics Per Day: 0.21 Content Count: 31,762 Content Per Day: 5.23 Reputation: 9,762 Days Won: 115 Joined: 09/14/2007 Status: Offline Share Posted February 25, 2017 Shalom All, Just reporting that after an excellent PM with Churchmouse, the point has been removed and his restrictions lifted. He can now join back in the conversation. To make a long PM session short, please, when you make remarks, take a look at how it will sound to the reader. A comment of "That's a man I truly pity" can be taken in many ways, and since it followed a backhanded remark, it was taken as the same. The post would never of been in question if the poster would of clarified what he meant, and this was discussed in PM. I can say that we were grateful that he took the time to evaluate the situation and understood what we saw as we understood what he was trying to say. People can only go by the words others post. Nobody is a mind reader, so the intention of the post may not be what the reader walks away with. Please, let's all take the time to review our posts before hitting the reply button, ensuring that the full message is portrayed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts