Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest shiloh357
Posted
4 minutes ago, Tea Ess said:

The question I wanted answered was: why don't you apply the same standard to girls wearing male clothing and doing activities seen as masculine? You say that men should be men and women should be women, yet you seem to only care about clothing/toys when it comes to boys. 

Is it a perversion for women to wear pants, play with toy guns, or compete in athletic events? If not, why?

I don't think girls should wear men's clothing.  But there are pants and shirts made for women and women have always worn pants, so that is not a "male" garment  Sports that are geared for girls are not a problem, never have been. 

I don't see a problem with girls training with and using REAL guns.   But the fact is that girls and boys are not the same and should not be treated the same.  Women are feminine and should stay that way.  Boys being feminine and girls trying to be men are examples of disorders that need to be corrected.


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  55
  • Topic Count:  1,693
  • Topics Per Day:  0.19
  • Content Count:  20,172
  • Content Per Day:  2.32
  • Reputation:   12,403
  • Days Won:  28
  • Joined:  08/22/2001
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
15 hours ago, shiloh357 said:

I don't think girls should wear men's clothing.  But there are pants and shirts made for women and women have always worn pants, so that is not a "male" garment  Sports that are geared for girls are not a problem, never have been. 

I don't see a problem with girls training with and using REAL guns.   But the fact is that girls and boys are not the same and should not be treated the same.  Women are feminine and should stay that way.  Boys being feminine and girls trying to be men are examples of disorders that need to be corrected.

 

I don't know if you know this but this is what going on  in most homes these days :laugh:

 You said :

Quote

women have always worn pants

:rofl:


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  496
  • Content Per Day:  0.12
  • Reputation:   398
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/18/2014
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

There is uniqueness in nature for boys and girls. God did create men and women differently. Men and women are wired different. In the name of equality, people try to destroy this uniqueness. That is wrong.


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  7
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  312
  • Content Per Day:  0.10
  • Reputation:   140
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/10/2016
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  09/05/1998

Posted
On 3/30/2017 at 3:13 AM, shiloh357 said:

I don't think girls should wear men's clothing.  But there are pants and shirts made for women and women have always worn pants, so that is not a "male" garment  Sports that are geared for girls are not a problem, never have been. 

No, women have not always worn pants. Pants haven't existed for all of human history, and they haven't been an acceptable and common garment for women in some eras and societies. In the US specifically, pants were considered a male garment up until the 1920s or so.

If I'm understanding you correctly, sports that are seen as masculine by society aren't okay for girls to play, but sports that are seen as feminine (or maybe not strongly leaning either way) are fine. Basically, it completely depends on society's arbitrary feelings on any given piece of clothing or sport at any given time. 

Therefore, to make a certain piece of clothing, a specific sport, or a behavior acceptable, all we have to do is change society's view of it. In 50 years, it could very well be considered acceptable for men to wear full faces of makeup or paint their nails. Or, *gasp*, for boys to play with easy bake ovens and dolls. 

How do you feel about certain occupations? Is it permissible for men to go into female dominated fields, or women to go into male dominated fields? 

On 3/30/2017 at 3:13 AM, shiloh357 said:

I don't see a problem with girls training with and using REAL guns. 

So it isn't acceptable for girls to play with toy guns, but using real guns is totally fine? Conservatism, not even once. 

On 3/30/2017 at 3:13 AM, shiloh357 said:

Boys being feminine and girls trying to be men are examples of disorders that need to be corrected.

What are the names of those disorders? 

Guest shiloh357
Posted
17 minutes ago, Tea Ess said:

No, women have not always worn pants. Pants haven't existed for all of human history, and they haven't been an acceptable and common garment for women in some eras and societies. In the US specifically, pants were considered a male garment up until the 1920s or so.

They were worn by women in ancient times as an undergarment and even in more modern times, as well.

Quote

If I'm understanding you correctly, sports that are seen as masculine by society aren't okay for girls to play, but sports that are seen as feminine (or maybe not strongly leaning either way) are fine. Basically, it completely depends on society's arbitrary feelings on any given piece of clothing or sport at any given time. 

No, that is not what I said.   There is a good reason that we don't have women competing against men in sports.  It has nothing to do with sports being "masculine."   But women compete in the olympics in almost every kind of sport that men do, we have women's basketball teams, soccer teams, golf, roller derby, and just about anything you can think of, but they compete against other women.

Quote

So it isn't acceptable for girls to play with toy guns, but using real guns is totally fine? Conservatism, not even once. 

A common sense approach to my comment would be that if I think it's okay for women  to use real guns, that it would be okay for them to play with toy guns as a child.

Quote

What are the names of those disorders? 

Being gay, transgender, those kinds of abnormalities and spiritual perversions.


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  7
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  312
  • Content Per Day:  0.10
  • Reputation:   140
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/10/2016
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  09/05/1998

Posted
18 minutes ago, shiloh357 said:

They were worn by women in ancient times as an undergarment and even in more modern times, as well.

I'm not arguing against that; I'm disputing your claim that women have always worn pants, which is incorrect. Again, pants haven't even existed for all of human history, and they haven't always been an acceptable and common garment for women across all eras and societies. In the US specifically, pants were considered a male garment up until the 1920s or so, and there have been rules enforcing that segregation, such as in schools and even in the US Senate, which prohibited women from wearing pants while on the floor up until 1993. 

25 minutes ago, shiloh357 said:

No, that is not what I said.   There is a good reason that we don't have women competing against men in sports.  It has nothing to do with sports being "masculine."   But women compete in the olympics in almost every kind of sport that men do, we have women's basketball teams, soccer teams, golf, roller derby, and just about anything you can think of, but they compete against other women.

Then I apologize for misinterpreting your comment. The rest of my post still stands for clothing and behaviors seen as masculine/feminine. 

What is your opinion of sports not segregated by gender, like a co-ed soccer league? 

27 minutes ago, shiloh357 said:

A common sense approach to my comment would be that if I think it's okay for women  to use real guns, that it would be okay for them to play with toy guns as a child.

I asked about toy guns and you responded with something about real guns, so I misunderstood your meaning. 

29 minutes ago, shiloh357 said:

Being gay, transgender, those kinds of abnormalities and spiritual perversions.

Those aren't actual disorders. 


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  21
  • Topic Count:  315
  • Topics Per Day:  0.10
  • Content Count:  3,491
  • Content Per Day:  1.09
  • Reputation:   2,582
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  09/25/2016
  • Status:  Offline

Posted (edited)

Well I'm still going to use gender specific sayings like

Womens' intuition, and real men don't eat quiche. :rolleyes:

Edited by HisFirst
Guest shiloh357
Posted
49 minutes ago, Tea Ess said:

I'm not arguing against that; I'm disputing your claim that women have always worn pants, which is incorrect.

No, it is not incorrect.   What we call "pants"  have always existed as both a male and female undergarment until recently.  Only now are they an outer garment and for a while they were worn exclusively by males as an outer garment. But that is different now.   But pants, historically, were not exclusively male.

Quote

Those aren't actual disorders. 

Yes, they are mental disorders.   Just like being trans-racial and trans-species.   We live in a culture now that tries to normalize everythng, mainstream everything no matter how sick, weird, perverted or disgusting.

Being gay is a mental disorder that is brought on by demonic influence.  Gay people need Jesus so that they can be delivered and healed from the spiritual stronghold of homosexuality.

Trans-genderism is just like that.  It is a mental disorder and the only real cure for it is an encounter with Christ.

Guest shiloh357
Posted
36 minutes ago, HisFirst said:

Well I'm still going to use gender specific sayings like

Womens' intuition, and real men don't eat quiche. :rolleyes:

:24:

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...