notsolostsoul

Saul the Pharisees vs Paul the Apostle. No difference really.

106 posts in this topic

17 hours ago, Sojourner414 said:

No, verified historical information by Dr. Erwin W. Lutzer.

You insist on declaring the portion of Scripture that the Lord inspired Paul to pen as not valid, yet you say you follow Jesus. Peter recognized Paul's letters as Scripture, yet you now insist he must be lying as well.

I have posted my points and evidence to back them up: you have not. Sadly, I will no longer reply to any of your comments: you have demonstrated that you are not here to learn, but to pull others into your error.

 

Jests is not Paul nor Peter nor any Apostle.

I follow Jesus, infallible, sinless, God in flesh, JESUS.

You can follow fallible, sinful MAN if you want.

No MAN, no matter how much inspired by The Spirit means more to me than JESUS.

JESUS IS CHRIST, My Christianity, my faith is in him.

I didn't call any liars nor invalid. I just said PAUL don't sit right with me so I test. Upon my testing I seeked his background, and from seeing where he came from, I now understand why he don't sit well with ME. The adding to what Jesus said and the way PAUL FOLLOWERS use his teachings are very similar to the way he was as a Pharisee.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, notsolostsoul said:

Jests is not Paul nor Peter nor any Apostle.

I follow Jesus, infallible, sinless, God in flesh, JESUS.

You can follow fallible, sinful MAN if you want.

Interesting, since you would not know about the sinless, infallible, God in flesh, if not for the testimony of the fallible sinners who wrote His story, why do you trust people who could be lying or mistaken, about anything regarding Jesus? Were they telling the truth, when they said that Jesus said they would recall the things He did?

Just strange, in my opinion.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, notsolostsoul said:

Jests is not Paul nor Peter nor any Apostle.

I follow Jesus, infallible, sinless, God in flesh, JESUS.

You can follow fallible, sinful MAN if you want.

No MAN, no matter how much inspired by The Spirit means more to me than JESUS.

JESUS IS CHRIST, My Christianity, my faith is in him.

I didn't call any liars nor invalid. I just said PAUL don't sit right with me so I test. Upon my testing I seeked his background, and from seeing where he came from, I now understand why he don't sit well with ME. The adding to what Jesus said and the way PAUL FOLLOWERS use his teachings are very similar to the way he was as a Pharisee.

Within that post is quite the accusation against Apostle Paul  & the Bible and those that believe in the Word of God includes all of the NT.  It is an insult to call anyone "Paul followers" & an insult to Jesus since it was HE who called Paul. 

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Omegaman 3.0 said:

Interesting, since you would not know about the sinless, infallible, God in flesh, if not for the testimony of the fallible sinners who wrote His story, why do you trust people who could be lying or mistaken, about anything regarding Jesus? Were they telling the truth, when they said that Jesus said they would recall the things He did?

Just strange, in my opinion.


An excellent point, Omegaman. The same basis used to disqualify Paul would also disqualify those who chronicled Jesus' life in the Gospels. :thumbup:

 

9 minutes ago, Davida said:

Within that post is quite the accusation against Apostle Paul  & the Bible and those that believe in the Word of God includes all of the NT.  It is an insult to call anyone "Paul followers" & an insult to Jesus since it was HE who called Paul. 

This is why I stopped replying to notsolostsoul; I was not going to get drawn into the kind of game that she was apparently trying to play. No matter what defense I brought concerning Paul's apostleship, she attempted to "side-step" it. it comes across as an accusation of idolatry to anyone who regards Paul's writings as Scripture, and I refuse to engage on that level. I consider it immature, and akin to putting one's fingers in their ears while shouting "la la la la la".

Edited by Sojourner414
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, notsolostsoul said:

Jests is not Paul nor Peter nor any Apostle.

I follow Jesus, infallible, sinless, God in flesh, JESUS.

You can follow fallible, sinful MAN if you want.

No MAN, no matter how much inspired by The Spirit means more to me than JESUS.

JESUS IS CHRIST, My Christianity, my faith is in him.

I didn't call any liars nor invalid. I just said PAUL don't sit right with me so I test. Upon my testing I seeked his background, and from seeing where he came from, I now understand why he don't sit well with ME. The adding to what Jesus said and the way PAUL FOLLOWERS use his teachings are very similar to the way he was as a Pharisee.

Well the problem is that the Word of God is what doesn't sit right with you.   Paul's words in the are Scripture and are inspired by the Holy Spirit.  Paul's words are a transmission from God to Paul.  Paul's words agree 100% with Jesus and a real Christian would know that.   Paul glorifies Jesus and points to people to Jesus consistently in His epistles and your criticisms of Paul prove you don't know or read the read the Scriptures.

So it is God and His Word that doesn't right with you.  You need to repent, believe the Gospel, get saved. 

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This one has ran its course, lots of good responses though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.