Big Bang Debunked

[KiwiChristian]

2 hours ago, siegi91 said:

Well, I am not sure what you are trying to knock down here, but for sure it is not the BB theory.

It most certainly is.

 

Take for example just one of your rebuttals: "a) It (Background radiation) comes from all directions except one direction being the Big Bang source."

You seem to believe that the BB is one huge explosion that took place at a certain place in a pre-existing space. You know, something like many billions miles in that direction. Well, that is not what the BB theory entails. As a matter of fact, the theory entails that space itself "originated" with the BB, so whatever happened took place "everywhere". So, to say that the BB happened somewhere is absurd.

"The Big Bang Theory is the leading explanation about how the universe began. At its simplest, it says the universe as we know it started with a small singularity, then inflated over the next 13.8 billion years to the cosmos that we know today." - https://www.space.com/25126-big-bang-theory.html

 

2 hours ago, siegi91 said:

But your fallacy is very common. And understandable. Scientists and sophisticated laymen commit it too, and very frequently. Maybe not with space but with time. Alas, our brain evolved in such a way, for survival reasons, that makes the existence of time as a separate entity from space a stubborn illusion difficult to get rid of, apparently. 

 

So, these guys are wrong as are the many scientists who support this theory, and YOU are right?

So, since there is so much disagreement over it, what it means is "we dont know" ?

NO-ONE can explain two very simple but IMPORTANT questions:

1) WHAT exploded and where did IT come from?

2) How did life evolve from non-life.

Now, you are going to argue that these questions are not part of the "evolution theory", but they really ARE. I am sure you are just as embarressed to admit you dont know.

2 hours ago, siegi91 said:

 

 

Don't we hear all the time that the Universe began 13.8 billions years ago? Or that it is 13.8 billions years old? Well, that is as absurd as saying that the Universe began in New Jersey. No matter if it is 13,8 billions of years or any time interval you want to plug in there.

So, are you admitting it could be 7,000 years? And, are you admitting WE DONT KNOW?

 

2 hours ago, siegi91 said:

The Universe, if spacetime is one of its constituents, did not begin to exist, neither in space nor in time, for obvious reasons. Even if the BB were accurate. as it seems to be. Therefore, the very word "origin" is not applicable to the Universe, at least as long as one of the basic premises of Big Bang cosmoloy (relativity) is assumed to be true.

 

 

Does this "theory" not violate newtons third law?

 

Wow, you are smarter than newton!

what do you mean "as it appears to be"?

You've proven that NO ONE can be sure.

[HAZARD]

Great Post KiwiChristian.

I agree with you mate, the big bang theory is the greatest load of garbage ever perpetrated upon mankind.

 

[Enoch2021]

17 hours ago, HAZARD said:

Great Post KiwiChristian.

I agree with you mate, the big bang theory is the greatest load of garbage ever perpetrated upon mankind.

Not even close:  Clearly it's...

#1.  "There is No God".

#2.  The 'Spinning-Ball' /Heliocentrism.

#3.  evolution (Whatever that is?).

#4.  'big bang'.

#5.  multiverses.

 

regards

[SkyWriting]

On 9/11/2017 at 5:45 AM, KiwiChristian said:

Key: The problem is that evolutionists do not want the public to know that scientists cannot figure out how galaxies, stars and planets originated.

Becasue they are usually biologists. 

God is so big and complex, that He created a big and complex Cosmos. 

Likely God is even bigger than the Cosmos He Created.

By the way, God is not subject to "time" and neither is the creation process. 
Likely it all took place outside of "time" as we know it.
If you list all miracles, you'd likely not find "time passing"
during any creation process. 

Edited November 6, 2017 by SkyWriting

[SkyWriting]

6 minutes ago, Sojourner414 said:

Then why does Scripture say that the earth was created in six days? And that God rested on the seventh?

Because it was so much work that it took 24 hours for God to catch his breath
with each effort?  Then God was very tired and needed a day off to recuperate?  
Because He just didn't have the energy to go faster?

Edited November 6, 2017 by SkyWriting

[SkyWriting]

On 10/22/2017 at 9:00 PM, KiwiChristian said:

 

On 10/22/2017 at 6:20 PM, siegi91 said:

 

"The Big Bang Theory is the leading explanation about how the universe began. At its simplest, it says the universe as we know it started with a small singularity, then inflated over the next 13.8 billion years to the cosmos that we know today."

 

I'm pretty sure the inflationary period was the first few partial seconds.  But they do claim space is still expanding.   

[SkyWriting]

On 10/22/2017 at 9:00 PM, KiwiChristian said:

So, are you admitting it could be 7,000 years? And, are you admitting WE DONT KNOW?

Of course all ideas of past events are based on faith of some kind. 

[SkyWriting]

2 minutes ago, Sojourner414 said:

I dearly hope that was sarcasm, as the Lord doesn't get tired. As to the point: the fact that it took a day for each facet of creation demonstrates that it happened in time.

Really, what are you trying to prove here? Because all your arguments keep relying on irrational biases and fallacies instead of solid reason, and you make no sense.

So if God was not tired, then why take a whole week to Create the Cosmos?

[KiwiChristian]

16 hours ago, SkyWriting said:

Of course all ideas of past events are based on faith of some kind. 

so why be biased and only present one set of dates and not admitting that it is a GUESS?

[KiwiChristian]

16 hours ago, Sojourner414 said:

Then why does Scripture say that the earth was created in six days? And that God rested on the seventh?

maybe to establish a 7 day week?

 

Can YOU explain WHY we have a 7 day week?