Noahs Ark

[Sister]

God has outsmarted the world once again.

No body knew exactly where Christ was crucified because it's not stated in the scriptures.  We only know that it was in Golgotha.

But for the record, to show a particular scripture true, God lead this man Ron Wyatt, in his quest to find evidence of biblical recordings, a cave, hard to get through, filled with rubble.  Once carefully excavated, a chamber revealed something in there, the Ark of the Covenant heavily guarded by four angels appearing as men.  These angels told Wyatt what to do, for this extraordinary find would reveal the place of Christ's crucifixion directly above the cave, and this is how we know today, the exact place if we have ears to hear.

When Christ was speared, ...after his death, his water and blood gushed out and fell in between the cracks of the rocks under him.  Hidden under him in that chamber was the Ark of the Covenant, now sprinkled not with animals blood, but the blood of our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ.  Christ's blood is what ended that old covenant.

The angels instructed Mr Wyatt to take a sample of the dried blood and take it to be analysed in the Lab.  They also instructed how this was to be done.  The dead blood being over 2000 years old was to be put into saline and gently swirled for 72 hrs as per the instructions of the angel, ...then this was put into a growth medium for another 72 hours and under the microscope, the white blood cells were dividing, and from that they were able to get a chromosone count. 

Christ blood is still alive!  WOW.  Even Christians are in disbelief that anything so amazing could be used as a witness against the world.

 

Remember this;

John 19:33   But when they came to Jesus, and saw that he was dead already, they brake not his legs:

John 19:34   But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water.

John 19:35   And he that saw it bare record, and his record is true: and he knoweth that he saith true, that ye might believe.

 

 

 1 John 5:6   This is he that came by water and blood, even Jesus Christ; not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth.

  1 John 5:8   And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.

 

That water and blood that gushed out of Christ has been left on THIS EARTH as A WITNESS.  It has been found, tested, and is not fully human blood, but like nothing ever seen before, because it is the blood of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, and bears witness in the earth.

And this information has been blocked from us, for they are forever trying to steer us away,  because the spirit of antichrist is so powerful.  All those sitting on the fence who don't know if God is real, and that he sent his only begotten Son to take us out of captivity,...and into his glorious kingdom, needs to hear this.

The two witnesses will come and put all things right, and those who fought against the truth will be ashamed, for the angel instructed Ron Wyatt to hide something else hidden in that cave and it is to remain hidden until the two witnesses come, then it will be revealed.

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest shiloh357]

7 hours ago, Sister said:

shiloh357

You still have not answered.

Did Wyatt not show proof?  Concrete evidence?  Photo's, video footage of his findings?

Yes or no?

No.   I will explain in the rest of this response.

 

Quote

The bible does not say that Christ was NOT crucified on top of a hill.  It says he was crucified in Golgotha, that's all we are shown in the Canon.

The Romans NEVER crucified anyone on the top of a hill.  The Romans used and reused crosses.   They had the cross posts already in the ground alongside the roads.   They crucified their victims side by side along the road, which is why Jesus was crucified between two malefactors.  We know how it was done based on records of the time period.

Quote

Who hired these experts to debunk is the question.  Are these the same archeologists that claim the earth is millions of years old?

Actually debunked by the fact that he could provide no real, tangible evidence.   Also debunked  by the fact that what he claimed he found  had already been found years earlier and documnted  long before Wyatt came on the scene.
 

Quote

 

Jesus was no any ordinary man crucified.  The Romans did not usually put a title above them either.  King of the Jews.

This was the biggest mocking of all time.  How many crucified raised the dead to life, healed the sick, and claimed he was the Son of God who could forgive sins?

 

The Romans crucified tens of thousands of Jewish men before and after Jesus.  The Romans saw him just another Jew.   The sign the put above his head was a mockery, yes.   But they always tacked on to the cross, over the heads of the crucified victims, the crimes they committed so that people could read them.    That's another reason why they crucified them alongside a road so that passers by could read what that person had done to deserve crucifixion.   In Jesus' case, they had nothing, so they made the sign to mock him since he was essentially being crucified to appease the Jews.

Quote

For one who caused such a stir, and was greatly mocked,  I don't see why they would put him in a common place, ...but makes sense to me, God would inspire them to crucify on top of a hill for all to see on that exact spot God chose.  This was no ordinary crucifixion, but one that would go down in history.

Yeah, that is just silly nonsense you have concocted in your head.  The Bible's description of the events coincides with history.  You need to learn history.

Quote

I never knew that hymn, and it has nothing to do with why I believe Ron Wyatt's findings.

But Wyatt did and it is that hymn that is the inspiration for why we always depict Jesus cruicifed on Golgotha.  And it is simply wrong.

Quote

So they tell you, men in power who lie against the truth.  You believe them?  Can you see a pattern?

I just know history and you don't.

Quote

 

The blood that was collected had 24 Chromosones.  23 from Mary, and one Y to determine his sex.

Do you think that Christ's blood should of had human Chromosones from his Father's side?  That his blood would be normal considering no human fathered him?

 

The problem is that human blood would no remain intact on the ground for over 2,000 years of rain and snow and wind and soil erosion.   He didn't find any blood because Ron Wyatt is a liar and he depends on silly, gullible people to believe him.   He never had actually provide any proof because there were plenty of people who are easily led, who never questioned him and who are always susceptible to sensationalism.

[Guest shiloh357]

7 hours ago, Jude1:3 said:

He also found the remains of Sodom and Gomorrah :

http://www.arkdiscovery.com/sodom_&_gomorrah.htm

 

An Unnatural Sphinx type structure: 

 

 

 

Walls and Building Type Structures: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wyatt didn't discover any of that.   Those are the discoveries made by other archeologists and Wyatt tried to hi-jack those discoveries and take credit for them.

[Guest shiloh357]

7 hours ago, Sister said:

God has outsmarted the world once again.

No, Ron Wyatt simply found enough gullible people to believe him.

Quote

No body knew exactly where Christ was crucified because it's not stated in the scriptures.  We only know that it was in Golgotha.

That location has always been known.

 

Quote

But for the record, to show a particular scripture true, God lead this man Ron Wyatt, in his quest to find evidence of biblical recordings, a cave, hard to get through, filled with rubble.  Once carefully excavated, a chamber revealed something in there, the Ark of the Covenant heavily guarded by four angels appearing as men.  These angels told Wyatt what to do, for this extraordinary find would reveal the place of Christ's crucifixion directly above the cave, and this is how we know today, the exact place if we have ears to hear.

 
 

Quote

 

When Christ was speared, ...after his death, his water and blood gushed out and fell in between the cracks of the rocks under him.  Hidden under him in that chamber was the Ark of the Covenant, now sprinkled not with animals blood, but the blood of our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ.  Christ's blood is what ended that old covenant.

The angels instructed Mr Wyatt to take a sample of the dried blood and take it to be analysed in the Lab.  They also instructed how this was to be done.  The dead blood being over 2000 years old was to be put into saline and gently swirled for 72 hrs as per the instructions of the angel, ...then this was put into a growth medium for another 72 hours and under the microscope, the white blood cells were dividing, and from that they were able to get a chromosone count. 

Christ blood is still alive!  WOW.  Even Christians are in disbelief that anything so amazing could be used as a witness against the world.

 

 

Quote

That water and blood that gushed out of Christ has been left on THIS EARTH as A WITNESS.  It has been found, tested, and is not fully human blood, but like nothing ever seen before, because it is the blood of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, and bears witness in the earth.

 

The problem is that Jesus was fully human because Jesus had to be fully human to pay for the sins of man. The Bible presents him as fully human.   Jesus blood did not go on to the ark.  that is just another lie by Ron Wyatt.   
 

Quote

 

And this information has been blocked from us, for they are forever trying to steer us away,  because the spirit of antichrist is so powerful.  All those sitting on the fence who don't know if God is real, and that he sent his only begotten Son to take us out of captivity,...and into his glorious kingdom, needs to hear this.

The two witnesses will come and put all things right, and those who fought against the truth will be ashamed, for the angel instructed Ron Wyatt to hide something else hidden in that cave and it is to remain hidden until the two witnesses come, then it will be revealed.

 

 

I bet I could sell you ocean-front property on Mars.

[Jude1:3]

5 hours ago, shiloh357 said:

Wyatt didn't discover any of that.   Those are the discoveries made by other archeologists and Wyatt tried to hi-jack those discoveries and take credit for them.

 

 

   He made the sites famous though. I think the Mt. Sinai site in Saudi Arabia was mentioned in some old books before Ron Wyatt made them famous. Wyatt was the first to show the Saudi Arabian Officials the site. That's why they fenced off certian ares.

[Guest shiloh357]

Just now, Jude1:3 said:

 

 

   He made the sites famous though. I think the Mt. Sinai site in Saudi Arabia was mentioned in some old books before Ron Wyatt made them famous. Wyatt was the first to show the Saudi Arabian Officials the site. That's why they fenced off certian ares.

But the claim is that he FOUND them, which is a lie.   Don't try to defend a liar.   Wyatt did not show the Sauis anything.  It was fenced off before he got there.   What he claims he found was really someone else's discovery and in some cases, the sites are not exactly conclusive which is why they were not published.

Archeologists (the real ones) are usually known for spending their entire career researching one site and several digs and collecting tons of evidence and it is only after 30 or 40 years of research are they credited for finding a particular biblical site.   Wyatt goes walking around and suddenly, he's found 10 or 15 biblical sites, and it is just not true.  

He is a total sham.

[Jude1:3]

10 minutes ago, shiloh357 said:

But the claim is that he FOUND them, which is a lie.   Don't try to defend a liar.   Wyatt did not show the Sauis anything.  It was fenced off before he got there.  

 

He DID show the Saudi Arabian Officials. Theirs a News Clip from CBS News interviewing Ron Wyatt about his experience. Go to Youtube and Type in "Ron Wyatt CBS News " and it's the first video that comes up. Starting @ 3:38 in the video.

[Guest shiloh357]

1 hour ago, Jude1:3 said:

 

He DID show the Saudi Arabian Officials. Theirs a News Clip from CBS News interviewing Ron Wyatt about his experience. Go to Youtube and Type in "Ron Wyatt CBS News " and it's the first video that comes up. Starting @ 3:38 in the video.

That stuff was already known about before Wyatt showed up.   He didn't find anything.  He is a liar.  Stop defending a liar.

[Sister]

10 hours ago, shiloh357 said:

No, Ron Wyatt simply found enough gullible people to believe him.

What, that these historical biblical events really did happen?.....strange.

[Sister]

10 hours ago, shiloh357 said:

The problem is that Jesus was fully human because Jesus had to be fully human to pay for the sins of man. The Bible presents him as fully human.   Jesus blood did not go on to the ark.  that is just another lie by Ron Wyatt.   

Jesus was born fully human, but in case you didn't know, he was not fathered by a human.  So his chromosome count would not be normal.  This would seem logical to me.