Permitting Muslim Abuse of Tommy Robinson

[Guest shiloh357]

4 minutes ago, one.opinion said:

These are opinions based on his words and actions. Can you prove these accusations are false?

No, they are lies based on nothing he said or did.   They are lies that you approve of and have repeated. 

He is not a bibot and has never indicated such.  He has a son-in-law and daughter-in-law who are Jewish and they married his children with his blessing and his daughter converted to Judaism with his blessing and they are all raising their children as Jewish and he has no problem with it.  He has members of virtually every race in in his cabinet and administration.

If he were an anti-Semite, he would not have blessed his children and Jewish relatives and he would not have moved our embassy to Jerusalem.

He has never said or done anything to indicate that he hates black people.  In fact, black people are better off under his administration than they were for eight years under the administration of a black president.  He has done more for black people in less than two years than Obama did in eight years.   He has honored back police officers and their families and got a black woman's prison sentence commuted and got her out of jail at the request of Kim Kardashian.

He has numerous women in the administration in high positions and that pretty much defeats the notion that he is a misogynist.

Quote

Media stories that claim proof that Trump is guilty of obstruction of justice or collusion with Russia are, in my opinion, premature. But ask yourself why Rudy Giuliani is starting to make claims like “collusion is not a crime.” There are certainly opinions that you may disagree with, but what stories are you referring to that contain outright lies?

They are lies and the more investigate, the more we see that it was the Democrats that colluded with the Russians, not Trump.  We are seeing far more evidence of Democrat collusion and currying favor with Russia than Trump.    Collusion is not a crime and they were saying that LOOOONG before Giuliani came on the scene. Several lawyers have pointed that out.   This is about trying to manufacture a crime and make Trump guilty of it.    You clearly don't keep up with what is actually going on.

As for outright lies....  Collusion is a lie and we have been in this investigation for over a year and not one scintilla of evidence has been brought up.  And believe me, if they had evidence, they would not sit on it for a minute.  They are so thirsty for something to pin on Trump for purpose  of impeachment that if they had found anything at all, they would not waste any time shouting it from the roof tops.

Obstruction of justice was an outright lie.  No evidence of it was found, either.    The reason they have to spend days and weeks on the Stormy Daniels story is because they can't produce anything else.   And Trump's one night stand with her wasn't criminal either and not an impeachable offense.  And it happened in 2006.   So all they have are lies and a lot of nothing.

Quote

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”

Yep, and that is a fact.   Mexico is sending up the people they don't want to take care of and who make up the criminal element.   These what the illegals are that are trying to enter the US illegally.  Mexico is happy for us to take them and let them be our burden. He wasn't talking about Mexicans that are immigrants who come the legal way.   He was talking about Mexicans and other Central American people who attempt to enter illegally.  They have criminal records and some of them are quite violent.  Mexico is happy for us to take those people.   There are many stories about Americans murdered on their own property in border states  by these illegals (the lying media doesn't report much on that). 

Quote

You May also recall Trump claiming there were “very good people on both sides” after the Charlottesville mess. He tweets what his on his mind and he continually demonstrates himself to be of poor judgement, if not outright racist/sexist etc.

Actually, the original people at that rally were there legally and the permits and were not KKK or racists or Neo-Nazis.  Nazis did show up, but were not the ones who started that rally and had no stake in the organization of that rally.   It was the Antifa people who showed up and started throwing jars of urine and feces at those on the other side, which is what led to the fight. 

The media made it look like that the organizers of the rally were Neo-Nazis or "white nationals"  which is now the liberal media "code" for white people who are patriotic and love America.   The truth to that story that never saw the light for very long was that it was not a white supremacist rally.  That is again, a lie the media told.   

[Guest shiloh357]

20 minutes ago, Badjao33 said:

Can you give a specific example from one of those sources?

Same question, can you give a specific example of a lie from one of those sources about President Trump?

Already have

[one.opinion]

13 minutes ago, shiloh357 said:

No, they are lies based on nothing he said or did.   They are lies that you approve of and have repeated.

What lies have I approved of and repeated?

 

[one.opinion]

15 minutes ago, Cobalt1959 said:

A person on the "Left," in today's connotation means supporting that which is amoral.

Do you think it is possible that your connotation is inaccurate? Do you think it is impossible for a Democrat to be a Christian?

[Wayne222]

Islam is anti christ. There is no doubt. No Christian can defend Islam and confess Jesus as lord of all. Islam will take over much of the world. And even parts of the United states. It's there plan.

[Guest shiloh357]

16 minutes ago, one.opinion said:

What lies have I approved of and repeated?

 

That Trump is a bigot, liar, misogynist, xenophobe

 

[Guest shiloh357]

26 minutes ago, one.opinion said:

Do you think it is possible that your connotation is inaccurate? Do you think it is impossible for a Democrat to be a Christian?

Not any more, not a modern Democrat.

[one.opinion]

21 minutes ago, Wayne222 said:

Islam is anti christ. There is no doubt

Agreed.

24 minutes ago, Wayne222 said:

No Christian can defend Islam and confess Jesus as lord of all.

Do you see a difference between “defending Islam” and correcting inaccurate stories and misconceptions about Islam?

[one.opinion]

3 minutes ago, shiloh357 said:

Not any more, not a modern Democrat.

Are you sure you mean this? Do you really mean that not a single registered Democrat could truly be a follower of Christ?

[one.opinion]

8 minutes ago, shiloh357 said:

That Trump is a bigot, liar, misogynist, xenophobe

I stand by that opinion. That does not make me a liar. Perhaps I should be more circumspect and say that he exhibits behavior consistent with being a bigot, misogynist, and xenophobic. I probably shouldn’t call him a liar. I should say that he has told numerous lies. How would you feel about my altered phrasing?