Daniel 9:27 covenant confirmed by Jesus

[ARGOSY]

1 minute ago, Montana Marv said:

Ezk 43:4 - The glory of the Lord entered the temple through the Gate facing East.  And the glory of the Lord filled the Temple.   This is where I will live among the Israelites forever (v.7) The house of Israel will never again defile my Holy Name.  That sums it up.

In Christ

Montana Marv

Not a convincing summary, there is still sin in Jerusalem, and the prophecy says there will not be. You are applying Ezekiel 43 to the first coming, but the very fact that there is sin in Jerusalem means that both Ezekiel 43 and Daniel 9:24 cannot apply to history.  Sorry v24 remains unfulfilled. 

[Montana Marv]

2 minutes ago, ARGOSY said:

Not a convincing summary, there is still sin in Jerusalem, and the prophecy says there will not be. You are applying Ezekiel 43 to the first coming, but the very fact that there is sin in Jerusalem means that both Ezekiel 43 and Daniel 9:24 cannot apply to history.  Sorry v24 remains unfulfilled. 

Dead wrong, Ezk 43 is about the Mill Temple, this is the 2nd Coming, Christ living among the Jews forever.  True, the Final Week of Daniel 9:24 remains unfulfilled.  The final Week, not the final half a week.

 In Christ

Montana Marv

[ARGOSY]

10 minutes ago, Montana Marv said:

Dead wrong, Ezk 43 is about the Mill Temple, this is the 2nd Coming, Christ living among the Jews forever.  True, the Final Week of Daniel 9:24 remains unfulfilled.  The final Week, not the final half a week.

 In Christ

Montana Marv

First you claim there mustn't be a break in the 490 years, now you are putting a break at year 483.  Why is your break better than my break? I am seeing a huge GENTILE PERIOD at year 486.5  which breaks the Jewish period. What is your reason for the break at year 483?

[Montana Marv]

2 minutes ago, ARGOSY said:

First you claim there mustn't be a break in the 490 years, now you are putting a break at year 483.  Why is your break better than my break? I am seeing a huge GENTILE PERIOD at year 486.5  which breaks the Jewish period. What is your reason for the break at year 483?

Because a Week is a One Seven, not two half sevens totaling a seven.  A half an apple in each hand does not make a full apple.

In Christ

Montana Marv

[ARGOSY]

1 minute ago, Montana Marv said:

Because a Week is a One Seven, not two half sevens totaling a seven.  A half an apple in each hand does not make a full apple.

In Christ

Montana Marv

 

So?  why does that matter? Where is the rule that says breaks must only be between the sevens, and not in the middle of the seven? 

[Montana Marv]

4 minutes ago, ARGOSY said:

 

So?  why does that matter? Where is the rule that says breaks must only be between the sevens, and not in the middle of the seven? 

Because the original prophecy states, there are 70 Sevens.

In Christ

Montana Marv

[ARGOSY]

Just now, Montana Marv said:

Because the original prophecy states, there are 70 Sevens.

In Christ

Montana Marv

If there is a break, it occurs where it occurs, because the Jewish period is over. To place a break BEFORE the crucifixion, leaving the crucifixion outside of the 490 year period makes no sense, as if the crucifixion is so unimportant in the 490 year period that it does not even have a place within the 490 year period for Israel. Just doesn't make sense that.

[Montana Marv]

3 minutes ago, ARGOSY said:

If there is a break, it occurs where it occurs, because the Jewish period is over. To place a break BEFORE the crucifixion, leaving the crucifixion outside of the 490 year period makes no sense, as if the crucifixion is so unimportant in the 490 year period that it does not even have a place within the 490 year period for Israel. Just doesn't make sense that.

The crucifixion was at the end of the 69th Week as Scripture says, leaving a One Seven (a full One Week) to remain.

In Christ

Montana Marv

[ARGOSY]

16 minutes ago, Montana Marv said:

The crucifixion was at the end of the 69th Week as Scripture says, leaving a One Seven (a full One Week) to remain.

In Christ

Montana Marv

There are TWO problems with that:

Firstly you are wrong, it was AFTER the sixty two sevens:  After the sixty-two ‘sevens,’ the Anointed One will be put to death and will have nothing

Secondly the coming of Jesus, when Jesus was publicly recognised as the Anointed One, occurred 3.5 years BEFORE the crucifixion, placing the crucifixion in the MIDDLE of the last seven. 

[Montana Marv]

13 minutes ago, ARGOSY said:

There are TWO problems with that:

Firstly you are wrong, it was AFTER the sixty two sevens:  After the sixty-two ‘sevens,’ the Anointed One will be put to death and will have nothing

Secondly the coming of Jesus, when Jesus was publicly recognised as the Anointed One, occurred 3.5 years BEFORE the crucifixion, placing the crucifixion in the MIDDLE of the last seven. 

Read the Scripture.  7 Sevens, then 62 Sevens and a final One Seven.  Please read the verse before you try to chastise.

In Christ

Montana Marv